Massive UFO fleet was recorded over Peru, Lima in May 2007!

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 31 2007 @ 01:06 PM
link   
A massive UFO fleet was recorded over Peru, Lima in May 2007!
unbelievable!
its similar to the massive sightings that have occurred in Mexico

youtube.com...


[edit on 31-5-2007 by nbgoku]

[edit on 31-5-2007 by nbgoku]




posted on May, 31 2007 @ 01:44 PM
link   
It's weird though, how they seem to form the constellation orion. Could the stars be this bright for some reason, to be seen during daylight?



posted on Jun, 3 2007 @ 06:00 PM
link   
That is definitely not just a coincidence.

I saw about 15 seconds of it and I could already make out Ursa Major & Minor, and the constellation Orion.

Someone should check if that constellation can be seen during that time of year in the place of the sighting.



posted on Jun, 3 2007 @ 06:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by aimlessly
It's weird though, how they seem to form the constellation orion. Could the stars be this bright for some reason, to be seen during daylight?


Exactly what I was thinking. These phenomena seem to only happen in South America. I think there is perhaps something weird with the atmosphere at those locations that make it possible to see very bright stars during the day.



posted on Jun, 3 2007 @ 06:10 PM
link   
wrong orientation for those constellations and also not possible to see them like that in the day.

Only supernova are visible during the day.



posted on Jun, 3 2007 @ 06:12 PM
link   
I 'want' to believe that they were some form of craft not planets or balloons or gas bubbles or what not. The main question it raises for me though is 'why' do they float way up high in the sky out of the field of video visibility? That stumps me. If they are somehow making themselves known, then why the compromise? Both 'flotillas' were the same in that respect or should I say disrespect. It raises questions for me as to the authenticity. The people seemed very excited and perhaps they could see the vessels if that's what they were a lot clearer than the video shows. I don't know, is there more footage on this sighting?



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 03:29 PM
link   
I dont know if anyone was able to understand but the report says that the same events has been recorded in Mexico and at 1:05 shows the comparison betwee what was seen in Mexico and what was seen in Peru, which is very similar. So whatever thi is, it has happen and has been recorded before.

For some reason the Nasca figures in Peru came into my mind when I saw this video.

EDIT TO ADD:

IMO, this type of event deserve more investigation, instead of the CGI/NOT CGI debates that are becoming the norm.

[edit on 16-8-2007 by Bunch]



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 04:23 PM
link   
Interesting, but too hard to make it out imo :S I really wanted to see some cohesive footage instead of the constant switching back and forth.

Were there no explanations offered for this? Like a wedding as in Stratford? No large balloons being realised either on purpose or by accident?

I think I have reached a point where I want sightings like this to be explained as earthly origin. The mere thought of larger and larger "fleets of UFOs" coming to Earth does seem a bit erie to me. I mean, it's like the quiet before the storm...

Anyways, nice post. Now let's get some large clear sightings in Europe



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 04:24 PM
link   
The International Balloon Releaser's Consortium strikes again! Maybe they joined up with the Japanese Lantern Secret Society to stage this event.

Or pehaps its the oil rigs in the ocean reflecting off gas bubbles in the atmosphere right?

[edit on 16-8-2007 by wildone106]



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 04:30 PM
link   
reply to post by wildone106
 


Nono... my money is on whales blowing bubbles. Flipper started it because he got envious that we have legs and he doesn't



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 04:44 PM
link   
I was watching a bunch of these in Jaime Maussan's 2006 video, and it struck me that these things have the appearance of some kind of light illusion or hologram. They have a projected appearance similar to that you can get from an 80's overhead projector - in the way they move in formation. Some of them even appear to be controlled by some kind of rudimentary "Etch-a-Sketch" control.

This sprang to mind when watching this UFO fleet, and all the Mexican ones, I urge anyone unfamiliar with D4rk Kn1ght's prophecy to read what he said months ago (last year?)



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 04:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Bunch

IMO, this type of event deserve more investigation, instead of the CGI/NOT CGI debates that are becoming the norm.


I don't see anyone screaming CGI here.
Obviously this is not a computer fabrication with all those witnesses.



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 05:00 PM
link   
I can only hope that the looney tunes who was on The Coast to Coast show about a year ago, saying that Bush was bringing chaos to the world, was doing it because the government knew they had to keep us "occupied" so that we dont know whats coming real soon from outer space.


I have no idea who said it but he was FRANTIC on the show.

Does anyone know which show i'm talking about?



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 05:25 PM
link   
As open minded that I like to be, this looks like a dirty camera lens. Watch and stop the footage just before the telephone lines and before the video gets edited at that point. If you look at the lights one of them apears before (in Front of) the power line meaning nothing was in the sky. Just what I see.

[edit on 16-8-2007 by JupiterJustice]



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 07:19 PM
link   
I can understand a spot on the lens being in front of the power line. The one thing that is very difficult to discount is the number of witnesses. Unless of course you are trying to convince us that they are gathering and gawking at a dirty camera lens! lol



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Umbrax:

I was referring to the other videos that we spent pages upon pages debating here.

And as far as the lens of the camera, I don't think that an event reported by local media in 2 different countries will have the same flaw in them, not to mention the multiple witnesses being interviewed as the event was happening? Does anybody needs a translation of what is being said? I can do it but is going to take a while.

The guy in a white shirt that you see giving an explanation when they show the 2 events side by side the Mexico one and the one is Peru, is the Commander of the Peruvian Air Force talking very seriously about the subject, he states that he has no idea of what it is. Very interesting stuff my friends.



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 07:34 PM
link   

Ufo fleet seen over Lima - Peru
May 21st 2007

Ufo fleet sighting very similar to the one seen over Mexico city, Buenos Aires, Madrid and many other cities.

PRELIMINARY ANALISIS 1. - According to the video of near 30 minutes of duration and the declaration of witnesses, which can be seen are between 30 to 50 physical manifestations, similars to spheres of white color, of unknown origin, very near one of which they were immovable, near two hours and half an hour, without emitting noise or sound some, to an approximated height of 2.000 meters (data to verify), that they were seen from different points from the capital.

2. - According to law, the Dirección General de Aviación Civil (DGAC), maximum authority of civil aeronautica in Peru, is the one in charge to authorize in zones of the airspace from Lima, the flight of airships with advertising, scientific aims or of another nature. Nevertheless according to the video, the objects did not "commercialize" anything, nor no scientific institution has demanded the responsibility of this massive aerial presence, until the moment.

3. - Either CORPAC, has not been pronounced about if the radar of the International Airport Jorge Chávez has been able to detect and to identify, these aerial anomalous phenomena. In any case, the zone of the sighting, is within the area of work of the radar before mentioned.

4. - The aeronautical hypothesis discards, since according to the video this urban zone is not airway, is not possibly looked like known aerial or aerodynamic object (airplane, helicopter, airship, model airplane, or similar).

5. - The possibility of sounding balloons for scientific workings dragged by the wind discards, because they were immovable near two hours and half and hour, in spite of the wind, soon not to move away or to move but visually to disappear.

6. - In case of not manned military aerial devices for espionage workings, also one would discard, since the nature of their task forces it to be furtive, and, less detectables or as far as possible observable. The myriad of objects was observed by more than two hours from diverse sectors of the capital.

7. - The hypotheses of metereological phenomena discard (there is no associate metereológical antecedents), atmospherics phenomena (like to ray in ball, rosary or similars, according to the video totally different), globes festive pyrotechnicses (we remember the duration of the event, immovable in the sky between half an hour, according to the cameramans and near two hours and half and hour, according to our sources); birds in flight or similars.

8. - Possibility of Sicosocial Campaign ?. - At the moment in the political aspect of Perú, there is no a problem of political, social or economic nature, so serious that it justifies the creation of a sico-social campaign, so elaborated. On the other hand, said supposed sico-social campaign one would occur within the context of the reorganization of peruvian intelligence services. The conflicts before mentioned are delicate, but they do not comprise of processes of deterioration or social political resonance, associable to sico-socials campaigns. But the accurate question would be well... exists technology at the present time to be able to project images in skies of holographic nature, so as we can observe in the video ?. And the answer simply we do not have it, because the source of information at the present time on this subject in concrete is very debatable. At the moment, we left raised the hypothesis. But we return in the beginning. And why to project holographic images in the sky of Lima? Experiments of social control?


By Dr. Anthony Choy
5-27-07


In video description of this version



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 07:39 PM
link   
Ominous lights in the sky, nothing definitive. I'm still hoping to one day see a real ufo on video.

i don't doubt that the camera caught what it caught, and I don't know what the hell it is, however I doubt it is some kind of alien flotilla or something. Why would an advanced race come accross the vastness of space and time only to flash around the sky in some third world dirt hole? I don't think so.



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 07:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by IgnoreTheFacts
Ominous lights in the sky, nothing definitive. I'm still hoping to one day see a real ufo on video.

i don't doubt that the camera caught what it caught, and I don't know what the hell it is, however I doubt it is some kind of alien flotilla or something. Why would an advanced race come accross the vastness of space and time only to flash around the sky in some third world dirt hole? I don't think so.


You see but we can not dismiss an UFO events just because it does not meet the White House landing criteria.

This is an UFO sighting until prove otherwise, it might not be the Starfleet armada but is really worth investigating.

Two different countries, multiple witnesses, 2 different videos in 2 different countries, reported in the local media.

My hole point is that this type of incidents are worth discussing, if it is the real deal is up to debate. This thread was buried in the abyss and just came by it when doing a search in google.

I guess that the concerns of some members might be proven right, we get caught up with the hoaxes and some that are worth discussing are just overlooked.



posted on Aug, 16 2007 @ 08:26 PM
link   
Oh, they are UFOs, no doubt about that. They fit the definition. But if astronomical viewing is ruled out, there is nothing to really research for this. Other than a video of some lights and a bunch of people that saw them, there is nothing more to go on, thus it is pointless to pursue it further.

I'm not closed minded, but I am just using common sense. Unless some other form of evidence of data comes in concerning this sighting there is nothing to discuss. But it is fun to ponder.....





top topics
 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join