Is it that nobody cares about these behind closed doors alliances relating the the 9/11 conspiracy to cover-up the truth, or is it that nobody cares because the people involved in this 9/11 conspiracy are mostly left-leaning Democrats?

I guess it's not as much fun connecting the dots with these *real* conspiracies because of the picture that becomes clear -the Democrats were at least as involved as the Republicans, if not moreso, in covering up the truth about 9/11.

Nick, I think it’s less to do with the fact that this sort of apparent corruption involves both parties as the reality that we are, ultimately, impotent.

To whom do we turn with this information?

I fear that we will respond in the same way if we uncover proof about government (or government agency) complicity in 9/11.

Once again the EXTREME BIAS and HYPOCRACY of members on this board
shows!!!

Nick has pointed out some very valid points......yet, since this has nothing to do with blaming Bush or commenting on how evil republicans/conservatives are and instead talks about the Clinton years....it will be throughly ignored.

Good post Nick

Should we not at least acknowledge a third force? Those who don't favor either political party and don't trust government. Clearly both parties are colluding to deceive the American public. Point the Democrats have voted to continue to fund the war w/o timetables contrary to public opinion. What have the Democrats done to stop the Bush administration? Nothing, so it really isn't R v D it more us v them. Political corruption of all parties is quite apparent, n'est pas?

Originally posted by ferretman2
Once again the EXTREME BIAS and HYPOCRACY of members on this board
shows!!!

Nick has pointed out some very valid points......yet, since this has nothing to do with blaming Bush or commenting on how evil republicans/conservatives are and instead talks about the Clinton years....it will be throughly ignored.

Good post Nick

Thanks!

It's a little bit disillusioning sometimes to look into the soul of the "Truth Movement." A lot of times I get the impression that it's really the "Bash America, Bash Bush, and Bash the Republicans" movement, and that 9/11 is being used as the latest stick.

Turning the spotlight of scrutiny on their supposed Democratic allies does not fit with the agenda of many people who are using 9/11 simply as a way to attack the neocons. Rosie O'Donnell seems to be a prime example of this. I didn't hear her or anybody else make a big deal out of the Bush administration giving Sandy Berger a get out of jail free card.

There is also almost no talk about Able Danger by the "Truth Movement" even though this was one of the most blatant conspiracies concerning 9/11. How else do you explain this other than the fact that it was a conservative Republican, Curt Weldon, who tried to get Able Danger in the spotlight?

And guess what? It was Berger and his consulting group that hand-picked and financed the opponent who ran against Weldon and won the election.

In fact, the only network that I saw that did an expose on the Sandy Berger case was Fox. Living up to their motto of being "fair and balanced" the thrust of the Fox special on Berger was why the Bush Justice Deptartment let him off the hook. What disappointed me about the Fox special was that they failed to point out that Lee Hamilton, former 9/11 Commission co-chair, was now employed by Berger.

If people in the government were smart enough to plan and pull off 9/11, wouldn't they also be smart enough to leave a trail of evidence pointing away from them?