Thunders

Excellent discovery. However, Victor Schauberger’s work is clearly different from mine. His work does not grasp the concept of the Channelized Air Effect.

Hi... Its been a while since I have posted a update to my progress. I still don’t have a budget. But, I am still able to improve on the design of my ST’s. And, I am perfectly happy with this situation. I have honed down to a particularly promising design. There is a parameter in this design which, when increased, will improve the performance (more air flow) of the ST. It is also obvious that if this parameter is made large enough the performance would be hampered. Thus, some where out there, exists an optimum value of this parameter resulting in a peak performance for this ST design. I have no idea where this optimal value is. I have to keep making and testing ST’s, with an incremental increase in the parameter with each version until a peak performance is noticed.

I have no idea how much air flow I will have at this peak. If I had to take an educated guess, I would expect enough air flow to do some useful work.

On the publicity front, The number of collaborating witnesses is increasing. I have given, out dated, ST’s to friends who in turn have shown them to other people. I do not, however, have a “Creditable Scientist” as one of the witnesses. I am working on that.

I now have one small question for you ATS readers. Should I post a progress update after completing and testing each version (every 2-3 weeks), or should I wait for something more significant.

I read a little about ST's in a Popular Science article. They proposed using hot water from a nuclear power plant to sustain the tornado. Instead of going to cooling towers for cooling, the vortex would "suck" the heat from the water cooling the water and extracting the heat to sustain itself and drive turbines.

Hi,

As you can see, it has been a while since I last posted anything. I am happy to announce that I have finely come up with a Synthetic Tornado design which is practical and easily expandable to supply all the free energy one will ever need and then some. Its main component can be manufactured inexpensively with an extrusion process.

The demonstration prototype which I have built and am upgrading is fabricated using layers of .06 in. thick pieces of vinyl plastic. Each layer is cut then stacked to produce the desired structure. The version I have built as of this writing has about 60 layers of this plastic. The upgrade I am working on will add another 40 layers.

I need an air flow rate of 10 in./sec. out of the 3/8 in. dia. out put hole in order to turn a simple paper paddle wheel enough to make a video. As of this writing I have enough air flow to easily feel on my hand but not the required 10in./sec.

When I have an upgraded version built with this required flow, I will post details of this design.

I would like to see free energy eliminate tornadoes.

The technology is tied to the Tesla saucers and his wireless
electrical transmission and his high current projection tube.

Releasing this technology will put an end to the Illuminati
and our ET rulers.

The ETs and Illuminati rulers won't do this cause they are all sick.

Being there are no ETs it will be the end of the Illuminati.

I wonder if there is an electrical affect causing the wind.

AD Moore made many static machines by unbalancing the
100 ions per cu cm in the air around us.

As long as there is an air flow, a way to amplify it might
be static or electric.

Originally posted by graysquirrel
I never even considered the violation of the 1st Law. Which is why I don’t think I even have any reference to it here.....

......Now that I have said that, I am curious. could you please post details of this experiment. I will take an educated guess in saying that I will probably be able to verify that you were a success and why the performance was so limited.

I'm sorry that I can't provide the details yet but glad we are on the same page! I've already solved my earlier failures on paper, just waiting for the opportunity to conduct the 2nd attempt at a different device that should test the theory - not the engine yet.

But not before I relocate and find a new job first! As the new design is more complex, more expensive, and more dangerous than before!

I still strongly suggest you go ahead and test your design though and disregard my failures!! I haven't got time to study your design in depth yet, so I could say anything is possible at this moment! I think it can be done cheap, I hope

[edit on 18-6-2009 by ahnggk]

Originally posted by MBF
I read a little about ST's in a Popular Science article. They proposed using hot water from a nuclear power plant to sustain the tornado. Instead of going to cooling towers for cooling, the vortex would "suck" the heat from the water cooling the water and extracting the heat to sustain itself and drive turbines.

Using the hot water for more power than cooling in the towers
almost seems counter how scientists are told to build things.
People with money tell the builders what to build.
A stupid way to make things.
Only a man like Tesla built what he wanted.
And now many people have what they didn't want built.

Originally posted by TeslaandLyne

Originally posted by MBF
I read a little about ST's in a Popular Science article. They proposed using hot water from a nuclear power plant to sustain the tornado. Instead of going to cooling towers for cooling, the vortex would "suck" the heat from the water cooling the water and extracting the heat to sustain itself and drive turbines.

Using the hot water for more power than cooling in the towers
almost seems counter how scientists are told to build things.

Not really, if you just run the hot water through the cooling towers, all you do is remove the heat from the water and the energy is wasted. If you can use the wasted heat for anything, it is a plus. Just think, hurricanes are fed from the warm waters they are over, they die out fairly quickly as soon as they get over land where they don't have access to a heat source.

People with money tell the builders what to build.
A stupid way to make things.

Exactly, I think that the people that come up with the ideas are the ones that should profit from them, not the pencil pushers. Having money doesn't necessarily you smart.

Only a man like Tesla built what he wanted.
And now many people have what they didn't want built.

A man ahead of his time. If he had all the money he needed, there is no telling where we would be today.

Originally posted by MBF

A man ahead of his time. If he had all the money he needed, there is no telling where we would be today.

It's actually his fault for not being clever and smart enough to make enough money to fund his projects!!

You know we live in a very cruel and very selfish world. I would suggest to all you modern-day Tesla's in the making, learn how to get rich!!

[edit on 22-6-2009 by ahnggk]

Originally posted by ahnggk

Originally posted by MBF

A man ahead of his time. If he had all the money he needed, there is no telling where we would be today.

It's actually his fault for not being clever and smart enough to make enough money to fund his projects!!

You know we live in a very cruel and very selfish world. I would suggest to all you modern-day Tesla's in the making, learn how to get rich!!

[edit on 22-6-2009 by ahnggk]

You have a point. I have the same problem. Got any suggestions?

After some though, I have decided to go ahead and post details before I have built an upgraded version with the 10in. per sec. required air flow. It really doesn’t matter how many layers or how long it takes me to achieve this required flow. This is still a practical free energy design and should not be withheld from the public.



Above is a drawing of a Pneumatic Transfer Pulley (PTP). If one stacks a number of these PTP’s on top of one another, the aligned through holes form two cylinders. A helical flow tornado is automatically created in each cylinder. The direction of the rotational component of the flow is the same for each cylinder. The direction of the flow component parallel to the axis of the cylinders for one cylinder is the opposite that of the other. The net result is that the PTP stack which has four holes in it (two on each end) has air being sucked into two of the holes and blown out the other two. Each end has an air in and air out pair. If one plugs both ends of one of the cylinders then air will be sucked in from one end of the stack and blown out the other.

The tornadoes are strongest at the center of the stack and weaken towards the ends. The strength of the tornadoes and hence power output is an exponential function of the size of the stack. Thus, one can get all the power one wants by increasing the size of the PTP stack. The only limitation being that at some point the internal tornadoes will be powerful enough to blow the PTP’s apart.