I think there's more to this than meets the eye.

Originally posted by Reptilian_Queen
I just wonder, is there any way that experts can analyze these CGI created UFO hoaxes and resolutely put to rest whether or not these Drone images are fakes?
[edit on 11-6-2007 by Reptilian_Queen]
THE experts opinion..
Originally posted by davidbiedny
As many here have noted. this is obviously a 3D rendered ship composited into photographic backgrounds. The uniformity of the surfaces and textures, the lighting and the modeling of the ship all underscore the fact that we're looking at a 3D rendered element.
it amazes me that some folks here think that this would be so difficult to model and render - sorry, it's a passable modeling job, nothing that would get the artist hired at ILM.
These images are fabricated. EOS.
dB
I dont think my quote up top is really what David and I had said about these photos but rather a reply I'd posted about the techical aspects of CG and the tools for detection of fakes.
However David Biedny and I have both unequivocally stated these photos are faked, just so it's clear for everyone's perspective.
Originally posted by Hunt3r
I'd also like to point out that there's a possibility that these images of the drone have (and are) being used in an ARG to promote Halo 3. Although the process of getting access (originally) was difficult (find a vague reference, beat some puzzle game, wait a while, get a math problem, figure it out, get a url) this is what you get:
www.##.###...
Anyone who has looked at the photos will recognize that as the writing from the drone.
"ar" in the url is believed to stand for AdjutantReflex, an AI/Construct who popped up on the forums over on Bungie.net, and people believe that the drone is his physical form.
Just puttin' in my two cents.