|
reply posted on 11-6-2007 @ 04:52 AM by Reality Czech
|
I think there's more to this than meets the eye.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2007 @ 11:07 AM by Watchtheskies
|
I'm not too sure if this will help or not, but a website i was looking at called the Watch the sky have
found this www.youtube.com...
The youtuber has similar CGI videos of UFOs flying around Paris.
It may be some sort of lead as to who this person (chad) is?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2007 @ 12:50 PM by Reptilian_Queen
|
I just wonder, is there any way that experts can analyze these CGI created UFO hoaxes and resolutely put to rest whether or not these Drone images are
fakes?
[edit on 11-6-2007 by Reptilian_Queen]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 11-6-2007 @ 01:29 PM by Watchtheskies
|
I'm sure they can.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 12-6-2007 @ 05:30 PM by rocksolidbrain
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2007 @ 02:14 PM by DocMoreau
|
Hey all, i created a thread to try to consoldate the Transformer Viral Campaign evidence into one place.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
unfortunately I am not super well versed in ATS... so we need your help, if interested.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-6-2007 @ 08:26 PM by Moserious
|
Originally posted by Reptilian_Queen
I just wonder, is there any way that experts can analyze these CGI created UFO hoaxes and resolutely put to rest whether or not these Drone images are
fakes?
[edit on 11-6-2007 by Reptilian_Queen]
It has been done. JRitzman and David Biedny are experts in this field and they have stated that there is no doubt that it's a hoax. Here are some
excerpts from this thread www.abovetopsecret.com...):
From David Biedny (Google this guy he is the real deal):
THE experts opinion..
Originally posted by davidbiedny
As many here have noted. this is obviously a 3D rendered ship composited into photographic backgrounds. The uniformity of the surfaces and textures,
the lighting and the modeling of the ship all underscore the fact that we're looking at a 3D rendered element.
it amazes me that some folks here think that this would be so difficult to model and render - sorry, it's a passable modeling job, nothing that would
get the artist hired at ILM.
These images are fabricated. EOS.
dB
Here is a quote from JRitzman (from this thread as well):
I dont think my quote up top is really what David and I had said about these photos but rather a reply I'd posted about the techical aspects of CG
and the tools for detection of fakes.
However David Biedny and I have both unequivocally stated these photos are faked, just so it's clear for everyone's perspective.
I have read about these guys and I have alot of respect for their opinions. I am not CGI literate and maybe I should learn more but for now I believe
them. Hope this helps.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-6-2007 @ 10:41 AM by CHRISTIANSEVEN
|
If its real then we all need to be scarred, but I seriously doubt it; I live in Chicago where they actually reported on the news in November about
people at a national airport(OHARE IN THE NORTHERN SUBURBS OF CHICAGO) saw something in the sky that couldnt be explained, along with that the FAA
acted like it was jst a weather phenomenon. Now this strange object could be from the Orion constellation or not. But I bet if this strange looking
kitchen utensil (cause thats wht it looks like especially with the wires coming out the top of it) were real, there would be more than jst some guy
named Chad posting pictures of it, I mean with all of the people with camera phones today other pictures would be everywhere. I say lets not continue
to put anymore truth in these photo's until one of these flying kitchen utensils is actually reported by a reputable source instead of some guy named
Chad who cant even be tracked down for question lol!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-6-2007 @ 02:12 PM by DocMoreau
|
I wanted everyone to know that Hunt3r found another 'drone' image:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Hunt3r
I'd also like to point out that there's a possibility that these images of the drone have (and are) being used in an ARG to promote Halo 3. Although
the process of getting access (originally) was difficult (find a vague reference, beat some puzzle game, wait a while, get a math problem, figure it
out, get a url) this is what you get:
www.##.###...
Anyone who has looked at the photos will recognize that as the writing from the drone.
"ar" in the url is believed to stand for AdjutantReflex, an AI/Construct who popped up on the forums over on Bungie.net, and people believe that the
drone is his physical form.
Just puttin' in my two cents.
After I looked around bungie.net myself, it appears that people are finding links to the various viral websites by looking at html source code. Have
any of these images popped up on 'personal' websites, or just on 'legitimate' ufo websites?
The mystery deepens....
Doc Moreau
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-6-2007 @ 06:40 PM by Reptilian_Queen
|
Hmmmmm....even with experts saying it's an elaborate CGI assisted hoax, it's still being treated as a smoking gun by several UFO enthusiasts like
Whitley Strieber.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 17-6-2007 @ 05:39 AM by CthulhuRising
|
I'm sure someone will soon start a new Big Basin Part 2 thread but for now here is the latest sighting...From June 5th. Same ship with no changes
this time supposedly 8 witnesses and one works on a newspaper..
Earthfiles report
yuefo was writting as I was I was just a bit slower :-)
[edit on 17/6/07 by CthulhuRising]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 01:11 PM by blowfishdl
|
whomever made the CGI video with the spinning aircraft also manufactured these pictures. Sorry to say but they are FAKE. end of story. no arguement.
if aliens traveled from distant stars they arent going to hover over your head and let you take pics of it!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:20 PM by schuyler
|
Originally posted by blowfishdl
whomever made the CGI video with the spinning aircraft also manufactured these pictures. Sorry to say but they are FAKE. end of story. no arguement.
if aliens traveled from distant stars they arent going to hover over your head and let you take pics of it!
Wow, fella, you just got here and seem to know everything! I'll grant you one, though; they are fake. But the rest of your points need some
clarification.
The person who made the CGI video (on YouTube) did not make the drones. He was attempting to show how easily the drones could be duplicated. In other
words, he believes thay are fake as well. The funny part is that Linda Moulton Howe saw the video and proclaimed it real. The guy had to go back and
put a clothes iron in place of the egg whip and proclaim more loudly that it was intentionally fake.
You have no idea of UFOs are from distant stars, nor do you have any way of telling what they would do when they got here. Many UFOs could be man
made. Indeed, we are pretty certain that many UFOs in the past were stealth aircraft. Proclaiming a UFO is an easy way to divert attention away from a
military project. There are also quite serious theories suggesting UFOs are not from other stars at all, but are from here.
I think you are in good company here on ATS in that many people believe these things are fake, but many people prefer to study the issue first and
examine what they've got, rather than call something a fake by proclamation.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 10:18 PM by Springer
|
Originally posted by blowfishdl
whomever made the CGI video with the spinning aircraft also manufactured these pictures. Sorry to say but they are FAKE. end of story. no arguement.
if aliens traveled from distant stars they arent going to hover over your head and let you take pics of it!
Schuyler summed it up pretty well above...
S...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 01:21 AM by the_DarkLight
|
Hi guys I’ve been intrigued by this drone thing for awhile now, watching the threads and such, I don’t normally reply, I usually just watch and
read, but while looking at the drone images and reading what people are saying about its aero dynamics I couldn’t help but wonder if the drone, if
real (I’m not sure either way yet) worked on a similar principle to the lifters
In which the electric charge creates thrust by forcing air down through the triangle, perhaps the drone works in a similar way creating thrust through
the rings, perhaps the wires sticking up from the top act like the wire above the triangle on the lifter for the electric charge, I found a
circular lifter which i thought was interesting
Its just a thought that popped into my head regarding how these things stay in the air and move perhaps they use a more advanced form of this
principle for creating thrust, the “fins” I’d assume would be for stability and help direct the drone, the bigger ones seem to have more rings
perhaps they need more thrust, and perhaps these drones aren’t as heavy as they look, for all we know they could be ultra light. But any how I’m
not even sure if they are real but I just thought I’d add my 2cents in relation to how they could fly.
Cheers
DL
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 03:26 AM by fooffstarr
|
Wow... i think i have hit the jackpot.
HALO 3 Viral Video with the original Chad UFO in it.
Enough to close the case?
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 04:04 AM by CthulhuRising
|
It also has pictures of crop circles and stonehenge. Should we blame these on a Halo3 viral as well?? Whether fake or real I'm guessing they have
just jumped on the bandwagon and are running with the idea.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 06:07 AM by fooffstarr
|
What intrigues me tho is that it names katie as one of the log in names. Katie is the name of the owner of (snip), that has an image of the UFO in its
cache.
Maybe just a copycat... but who knows.
mod edit: removed supposed halo viral marketing site that contains a bunch of bad links.
[edit on 21-6-2007 by Crakeur]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 07:55 AM by rocksolidbrain
|
Enough to close the case?
It is just a compilation of some random pics taken from net.
And there are 100s of such on utube. Not enough....
[edit on 20/6/2007 by rocksolidbrain]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-6-2007 @ 11:07 AM by Outrageo
|
Cool video - spooky music and everything!
No offense though: trying to close the drone case on this video alone would be like attempting to convict someone for murder by showing a picture of
him, another picture of the victim, and a third picture of a gun in sequence.
They're just pictures.
Sure, it "could be" a Halo3 viral marketing campaign. It could still be a hoax. It could be related to Transformers (but I doubt it) or some other
movie/video game/book/media event, it could be a DOD skunk drone (complete with faux writings - but I doubt that too), it could be CGI (likely) by
some prankster, it could be a model held up with a fishing pole. It could be any number of things. It could even still be real (most doubtful of
all, IMO). We have lots of great theories, wonderfully creative speculation, pundits and fans galore.
What we don't have is credible evidence that any of these things is what the hopeful are proclaiming they are.
Maybe we'll ultimately get such evidence.
This ain't it.
Case not yet closed. Not by a long shot...
[edit on 6/20/2007 by Outrageo]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |