Chad Drone Omnibus..Chadsquito

Its 2MP, Nokia. I don't have any lower resolution cameras at this time. But I'm 75% certain that its a cursor in that pic.

Ok fresh news (if its not posted yet)....
This appeared on ufocasebook.com today.


Page is here :
www.ufocasebook.com...

You can see that the Issac's diagrams are drawn on the drone. Pretty strange. Now the question is, why would aliens copy his study and paste it on their drones ?

That is a cropped image from the High res Image,warning LARGE, finally released by LMH about a week ago. The question is why so long and where are the rest. Supposedly all the BB Ty images were sent at this quality.

I don't know. There's just something too fishy to me about these drone reports. I just can't put my finger on it at all.

Yes, I was thinking that aswell seems like LMH is keeping evidence for herself ... Or she might have alot to do, it's like the 90 minute crop circle we haven't heard anything else about that from her.
Anyway would really like to see all those HQ pics.

"...a lot to do...?!?" No offense, but I think you're former assertion is closer to the mark. Linda needs to either admit a tendentious interest in the material in her possession or cough up the goods. If she is truly a seeker of wisdom - and knows something substantial that we don't - she MUST also realize she has an obligation to the rest of humanity (especially those like us gasping for an air of truth) to divulge (with whatever cautions she deems necessary) any empiricism that has come to light.

Maybe she is hoarding the ripest fruit for an upcoming book, DVD, or other profit-driven outlet of her choosing. That would be sad...

IMO if she had anything really important, she'd jsut spill the beans. What she's probably got is just more pictures and statement from "anonymous witnesses." I've begun not to trust ehr farther than I can throw her. Doubtless she's saving it for her next C2C interview, where all she'll say is that she has more info

OK so here's the latest thread..
CARET/Drones Debunked?

My short answer..Certainly not by this long winded, patronizing, bloated and over quoted bunch of "high brow" drivel. With the amount of words this guy uses in order to say he thinks it is all a hoax he should be in politics...
His "meme" on hoax "memes" will certainly be just as self perpetuating. Did anyone else notice the similarities in style and presentation in this article as in the hoaxes he is trying to expose?
A long winded story full of tantalizing off shoots into many different areas and ending with a "More to come next month" line...

I can see the dust from the bandwagon (or is that a wagon train)from all the way over in Malta..

P.S and yes I do believe this is a hoax but sprouting an opinionated bunch of drivel like that really doesn't prove it anymore than saying it is fake because in my professional opinion the photos are CGI.

Apologies to all that take offense at this rant...Just wanted to blow off some steam..I am just getting frustrated waiting to see some REAL tangible proof that this IS FAKE..

New info in from Isaac on Earthfiles.
Apparently LMH received these emails on the 27th June and waited till now to release them as she was "expecting" to talk to Isaac on the phone..Or was she just waiting for her slot on Coast to Coast to come up before releasing it??

From the moment I saw this I thought the "object" looked way too clear, way too crisp. I've taken a class on photography, have developed my own negatives, made my own prints and done a lot of other photography / imaging related stuff.

On top of that I'm always highly suspect of UFO photos of objects close enough to the photographer to be considered within their area of influence.

Or what Issac is saying is actually true. Then that would mean either those things are government vehicles (reverse engineered) or they really are the real deal ET vehicles coming to find their lost buddies. haha. I've never seen one, so I wouldn't want to say 100% real or fake.

Know one will know 100% until one flies over someone that's trigger happy and take it down.

Hank Harrison en.wikipedia.org... wrote:

Jack et al: for list: Its about time. As you know I have been in
correspondence with several people on your list about the drone
technology for several years.

All the while you were bashing your brains at SRI trying to peer into
the distant Sargasso, I was working on a black project down the
Peninsula at Lockheed. It was known at the time as Aquila. That drone
turned out to be the Predator, but in those days it had a carburetor
Briggs and Stratton lawn mower engine and couldn't make the needed
altitude, still we all knew it was going somewhere when Lockheed
sealed our lips with nice bonus bribes and sold the whole thing t the
Israeli's...

That was 1978. Now here we are nearly 30 years later and you dummies
are entranced by these drone sightings....hey man they never stopped
doing the drone research at the Skunkenwerken... the reason you see
them up in Big Basin and near AFB installations is because that State
Park is in a straight line to Lockheed.Martin down in Santa Clara and
the AFBs are launch locations

The basket drones reported by Linda Howe absorb electricity from
various sources close to the ground then go back up to the
stratosphere because they don't need an aspirated engine to fly, this
means they don't need a jet or a gasoline pack.

They are electromechanical and they fly with the wind and compressed
air. The pictures you showed were during the absorption deployment
mode, but all of that wiring and cage like apparatus folds up and the
"wings" fly the thing in the jet stream etc.... they are not
anti-gravity devices, but a gullible mind could easily be lead to
believe that they are.

The spec was to build a flying drone that could perpetually stay aloft
in the atmosphere without detection...ultimate stealth. They are
currently being used to detect satellite signals and are guided by our
own satellites and/or our own microwave and radio inboard computers.
They also have compressed air propulsion units, photovoltaic cells,
micro gyros and are launched In a folded configuration from planes. In
other words they are almost like kite based solar wind satellites that
make their own power. One future deployment is for the manned Mars
expedition, but I assure you they are currently terrestrial and they
are ours.... hank

:source:

That reads like "Hank" has a few too many sci-fi movie rentals from "Blockbutters" recently... Electro Capture Air Compression Powered Flight?!

Just IMHO of course...

Springer...

[edit on 8-9-2007 by Springer]

All that kind of might make some sense, but what's the writing then? Too many engineers watch Star Trek on their spare time?

Hello,
this is my first post
I'm an Eritrean in diaspora living in Norway...
I was very impressed by the high quality pictures of these drones...
But as soon as I saw the eritrean characters reported as alien language,
I realized this was an hoax...
Unless the aliens use the same written language as we have in Eritrea....


Take a look at this site (...open some of the pdf files) and see for yourself:

www.dehai.org...

And compare with the pics here:
www.coasttocoastam.com...

These Drone pics are fake!I am a photographer and its just obvious!

Obvious does not work around here. Sure, there is no doubt they are fake, and anyone with half a brain can tell that from the first photo. The problem with the UFO community is there are so many that are SO eager to believe they pretty much turn off their common sense.

And why is it up to normal people to prove it's fake anyway? Why don't the people who want to believe so bad give us some solid reasons why those of us with common sense should believe it isn't fake?

I'll say this again, it's threads like this that HURT ufology.

already spoke about this in the Isaac CARET - C2C Drone possible explanation thread... thread link no matter what you say the "experts" will tell you its CGI. its not worth fighting the good fight anymore.

[edit on 8/21/2007 by bokinsmowl]

whats the writing on them?

There is a huge 170+ page thread on this board which explains the writing in great detail, by "isaac" himself. Don't have it on hand, i'm sure you can find it quickly though.

**edit** Here's a link to the thread, was right on the first page still

www.abovetopsecret.com...

To try to explain it quickly (it's really far out there, and takes alot of imagination).

Supposedly, these are all back engineered from ufo debris discovered, the the language, and metals worked on and researched/reproduced by CARET, Palo Alto.

The ships supposedly have no moving parts. This "special" metal, when written on, with this "special" language. Makes the vehicles basically come to life, and operate so to speak.

I think Isaac writes thats it's something like writing computer code on a sheet of paper, and basically having the paper carry out the program. No need for a computer ect. Software, without hardware ect.

It's pretty interesting, I'm still digging around here, and on some other sights(message boards), where people have reported to decyphered, the writing.

I read one guy on another site who said he had it figure out, but then started talking about multi dimensional universes ect. Too much for me to grasp. hehe. But It is a pretty interesting comment.

The pages, and so called "Language Primer" pictures that "Isaac" again "supposedly" smuggled out of Palo alto (the stuff these people are trying to decypher), are also VERY interesting to look at. But I can't make any sense out of it.

It's a very interesting story, and when put together with Chad, and other witnesses photos "if real", make for some serious groundbreaking evidence of maybe not ET's, but super technology at least.

I'll look around for a link to that thread, and pictures.

**edit**

My apologies if you know all of this already, hard to tell after re reading your post. Sounds like you may be doing the same as me, and just throwing your hand up in the air, and saying "But what's with the writing?".

Maybe looking for someone to decypher it as well. Either way, take care



[edit on 22-8-2007 by Nola213]

[edit on 22-8-2007 by Nola213]

[edit on 22-8-2007 by Nola213]

Nice, pretty, close, but I don't think it's a match.

Eritrean? Norway. Wow

That's a really nice script you have there.
So many places in this world, I've never heard of. I need to do some travelling.

Ok Nola213,
Sorry that you don't believe me, if you know any Eritrean or Ethiopian, please ask them if they identifies any letter written on the "wing":

You will be surprised, promise.






[edit on 22-8-2007 by cosby]