It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But that's not much different from the numbers in the polls that include Paul.
Originally posted by hoochymama
Which, if you did your research thats exactly what is happening. All the polls that dont include Paul show anywhere from 22%-30% as UNDECIDED.
Originally posted by Togetic
But that's not much different from the numbers in the polls that include Paul.
Originally posted by hoochymama
Which, if you did your research thats exactly what is happening. All the polls that dont include Paul show anywhere from 22%-30% as UNDECIDED.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
which are next to none. Go look at how many polls have been taken, than look at how many polls include Ron Paul. Not only that, but to get an idea of these "polls", they survey "randomly" maybe a thousand or two thousand people. maybe less. These polls are worthless.
I think the polls are right. I think that this perceived groundswell is an illusion. Either that or it is a house of cards.
Originally posted by NGC2736
So then the polls are just wrong, is that it togetic? Because Ron Paul did get invited to the debate, so he is a viable candidate, and not a joke. But the polls don't show that because either enough people haven't made up their minds or the 4-5% error margin just misses him.
As someone in the business, I would advise Paul to try and cobble together a coalition of like-minded voters. Unfortunately, I don't think there are enough like-minded voters. Those who might agree with his foreign policy may not be pleased when he probably says that he wants to abolish Social Security, Medicare, and the IRS, and never go anywhere near a socialized system of medicine.
Well, I'm not an expert, and I can see how this might explain it. It seems to explain it much to conveniently, but anything is possible.
So what does he have to do to get a rise in his numbers? Or even a downturn? How does he keep from setting right where he is, despite the fact that he is causing so much fuss and bother to Ranting Rudy and all the rest?
I'm curious to see this.
Ah, of course, it's them Jews. I should have known. That's no argument, and without clear and convincing proof, it's racist. Why is it so hard to accept that no one gives a flying flip about Ron Paul? It happens: you agree with someone but no one else does. I agree with a lot of what Ron Paul says--more than you might realize--but I recognize that no one else agrees. It happens; it's called democracy. He's had a platform on television to explain his beliefs, but he was unable to bring himself to national prominence in the Congress and that's his fault. It's a shame, I happen to think that this country needs 8 years of libertarian rule. But just because other people are too dumb to disagree doesn't mean that there's a Jewish conspiracy behind it all.
Originally posted by Golack
Its really quite simple. The media is owned by powerful zionists. They want the US to continue warring in the middle east. They want the US to continue sending Israel tens of billions of dollars every year. Ron Paul wants to pull out of the middle east completely leaving Isreal defenseless. Ron Paul wants to reduce spending in government leaving Isreal without our money.
[edit on 27-5-2007 by Golack]