It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigred1000
I read a book recently that said there where female freemasons, in lodges for women only and also in coed lodges. Is this legit? How did it come about?
Originally posted by RWPBR
It is not just the U.S. that doesnt recognise female Masons. Most Grand Lodges in other countries dont as well...except France...need I say more ?
Originally posted by Masonic Light
Originally posted by RWPBR
It is not just the U.S. that doesnt recognise female Masons. Most Grand Lodges in other countries dont as well...except France...need I say more ?
The National Grand Lodge of France (which is regular) does not recognize female Masons. Nor do the other two large (but irregular) bodies: the Grand Lodge of France and Grand Orient of France.
In other words, the only people in France who recognize female Masons are...well....the female Masons.
[edit on 22-5-2007 by Masonic Light]
Originally posted by scientist
somewhat off-topic: what makes the grand orient of france irregular? It actually doubles as an international Mason museum.
Originally posted by Baphomet79
I believe the main reason is that they admit Atheists.
Originally posted by bigred1000
These female lodges (clandestine) in France, do they have the same ritual? I can't imagine a female taking the same obligation as a male.
Originally posted by RWPBR
The only aprons women should wear is the one in the kitchen !
Originally posted by bigred1000
Wow, I am at a loss for words! My question is this, did the rise of female "masons" in the United States parallel the womens lib movement? from the 1960's?
Originally posted by PrinceHall06
Help me understand the thinking here.......If they have the OES, Amaranth, White Shrine, Jobs Daughters, Circle of Perfection, Rainbow, LOS, DOI, and other female appendant bodies....why the pressing desire to become Masons ? And how can they claim legitimacy, if the landmarks that we are built upon clearly state that the qualifications are "being a MAN, free born, of lawful age and well recommended, professing a belief in a supreme being".....dont get me wrong I love women, and I'm sure this is what the anti's love to use for their personal attacks and male/homo insinuations on here, but what is so wrong with a Men only organization and what prompts any lady to want to infiltrate it or mock it ?