It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Elfworkz
Back to the original question. Where are the satellite images of Antartica? I would just like to take a look around myself instead of using "what if" scenerios.
Our technology like you said may not support a city however; there are underground bunkers and things which have power generators and ways to survive a nuclear blast. How long is the question.
Back to the original question. Where are the satellite images of Antartica?
Originally posted by Pjpuas
However if you guys go back to the second page and
look at my previous post, you will find that there are some pretty
resolution picks in the website that I have previously mentioned.
Originally posted by Elfworkz
Now your eyes are open Pjpuas..............no images............o they arent important as Mars, Venus, or the ocean.....
Hmmmm
Originally posted by verbal kint
i dont know if this is already discussed (i skipped page 2), so sorry if so...
forgive any ignorance as well, for this is way outside my areas of expertise, but aren't sattelites generally placed in geo-synchronous orbits? wouldn't that be problematic in terms of plain physics, at some point nearing a pole? i.e. in geo-synchronous orbit, directly over a pole, wouldnt the sattelite be stationary and immediately come crashing straight down? i would think this would remain a problem until you reached a point where the pole was immediately at or beyond the horizon (from orbit). anyone actually know about this stuff?
Originally posted by Elfworkz
In 1938, Hitler, anxious for a foothold in the Antartic, sent an expediition commanded by Captain Alfred Richter to the coast Due south of South Africa. Two seaplanes were launched from the deck of the carrier, Schwabenland, daily for three weeks. They had orders to fly back and forth across the territory which Norwegian explorers had named Queen Maud Land. The Germans had then made a far more thorough study of these region,
finding vast areas that were free of ice. They renamed the area
"Neuschwabenland" and claimed it as part of the Third Reich. German ships and U-boats continued to operate in the South Atlantic Ocean, particularly
between South Africa and the Antartic, throughout WWII. Then, in March 1945, just before the end of the war, two German U-boats, U-530 and U-977, left from a port on the Baltic Sea. Alegedly, they took with them members of the flying saucer research teams, the last of the most vital saucer components, the notes and drawings for the saucer, and the designs for gigantic underground complexes and living accomodations based on the underground factories of Nordhausen in the Harz mountains. The U-boats allegedly unloaded all of this in Antartica. Then, two months after the war, they mysteriously surfaced off the coast of Argentina where the crews were handed over to the American authorities, who interrogated them at length and then flew them all back to the United States and questioned the Captains of both U-boats for almost ayear.
Originally posted by VType
And too the folks saying"theres nothing too see" I say bull maybe I want too look at Polar bears or old scientific encampments or just plain old snow cliffs.
But Im thinking there are other reasons too keep the public in the dark about both South and North pole activities.
Originally posted by Black Flag
What I have been told about poor resolution of polar regions in commercially available images has to do with the orbits of the satelites taking the pictures.
The satelites go "across" the landmasses of the earth, and not "Up and Down" over the polar regions.
Essentially, the shots of the poles are from the "side".
Overly simple answer, but I think you get my point.