Originally posted by kontol
You have good references from your grandfather, you have a manuscript, you know about Mason inside out. Judging from that, you can easily join Mason.
Not really. Like I said, my grandfather died before I was born. It's not like he could vouch for me. I do have a manuscript, it's true. That's
really most of the inside information I have. I do not know the Masons inside out, only what I've read. Judging from that I can't easily join the
Masons, though I suppose I have as good a chance as anyone else. But the fact is I don't particularly want to join the Masons at all and I don't
think I ever said that. So your assumptions are wrong there, kontol. No big deal. I'm not criticizing you personally; it's just that they are wrong.
You don't need to shout about your joining in this public forum. Are you trying to seek for attention?
You don't need the "for" there. It's just "seek attention." Nobody's shouting. Did I use capital letters for anything but the beginnings of
sentences or acronyms? No, I didn't. I thought I was being pretty straightforward and calm. But as for "seeking attention" itself. Sure. That's
true. Their attention. Like I said, the number is unlisted, so to speak, and if they monitor this public forum, I thought it would be one way to get
their attention. I didn't mean to put anybody else out on this. And the fact is, I'm getting a little desperate. I don't know how to explain this
exactly, but I'll try.
My consciousness is apparently a little different. I know that statement sounds initially absurd and I'm not 100% positive anyway, but my
consciousness and awareness of the world flows out from me with me at the center. I would think that would be the same for everyone. How could it not
be? Of course that's how it works. Consciousness flows out from every individual and from the point of view of every indivividual, he or she is the
center from which it flows. Otherwise we wouldn't have individuals at all. It would be some sort of joint consciousness.
Well, this particular feeling is unusually strong in me compared to others (I think!) I don't mean this in an egotistical sense, but the universe
starts here, period. This is coupled with a certain knowledge that I have something to do here and the fact that I seem to be drawn to these
mysteries, UFOs, and the like. The manuscript alludes to this, but it is not nearly helpful enough. There is a purpose that is more than just getting
a job, having a family, growing old, getting sick and dying. Whatever it is, it's big. Unfortunately, no one has seen fit to tell me exactly what it
is. Sgt Clifford Stone is the mild mannered guy who can talk with aliens through telepathy and did so for the government. He said exactly the same
thing, which was cool because I found someone saying the same thing. But in his case I'm thinking, well, your purpose is to talk to the aliens,
dummy. It's right there in front of you and you're doing it!
In my case I haven't done it, so rather than remain passive for the rest of my life I'm trying to figure it out. The original post was to get their
attention and is just one stone not left unturned, that's all. I'm doing other things, too. It's kind of my current campaign, and this is just one
small part of it.
Thanks for the suggestions I've received. Thanks very much. In hindsight, doing the "guvvy" intel thing would probably have been the best idea, I
agree. Just too late to be conventional. Wish I had been more focused. To the guy who says this isn't the way they are organized. Sure, buddy.
Whatever you say. As for the NWO being evil and all? That's not true at all. You're being silly. Typical propaganda: villify your enemy. Say they
eat babies, then you'll be justified. Nonsense. If you are paranoid to the point of caching guns and ammo and intend to try to stop this through the
use of force, then, yes, you'll have to be taken out. That's what I meant to millerman. Perhaps I was too harsh. Sorry. I wanted to get acoss that
I'm not an anti-NWO fan boy and I'm not on your "side."
Anyway, I hope this explains things a little better. We'll see if it actually works, I suspect.
[edit on 18-5-2007 by schuyler]