I recieved this information today by someone who knows me. I do not know them. It's interesting and offers information about remote control and
alotta other stuff.
Just curious what ya'll think of it.
This 911 Nutshell email was sent from a send-only email account.
IN PHOTOS OF THE BOTH CRASHES INTO THE WTC TOWERS the imprints were like 'two peas in a pod' so it is a safe assumption that both airliners were
737s. Holes compared.jpg
.Each side of the WTC towers is 208 feet with 60 pillars on 3.5 feet centers. A Boeing 737 wingspan is 95 feet. The measurement from the centerline of
the 737 to the wingtip would be about 50 feet or 15 pillars on the wall face. (In contrast, a 767 has wingspan of 156 feet or about 45 pillars, from
centerline to wingtip 22 pillars).
Looking at the crash imprints count the number of pillars from the center of the large hole to the right wingtip. The planes struck at an angle
instead of straight-on so the left wing wall damage was caused by the wing coming across it where the right wing wall damage would be more of a direct
hit and a more accurate measurement. A 737 would leave a 15 pillar right wing damage imprint.
FURTHER EVIDENCE that the '9/11' Boeing 767 airliners were switched with Boeing 737s:
(1) Engines on 737 airliners are mounted on PODS, 767 airliners aren't on
pods. The 767 has a longer snout or nose ahead of the wings along with the engines closer to the wings than the 737.
Photos of the 767:
Photos of the 737:
(2) Unlike a 767, a 737 is capable of 60-degree banking maneuvers (on one
engine!) Notice the 737 making such a maneuver as it crashes into the South
(3) In an interview with a retired United aeronautical engineer, he said the
engine part seen in the documentary '9/11' on the street below the North
Tower after the first crash was not part of a 767 Platt & Whitney engine. Attachment engine3.jpg
Thus ruling out a 767 airliner.
(4) The FBI issued a federal grand jury subpoena to an airline pilot for
purchasing a CD-ROM of 737 technical information on EBAY. Trying to clean up
737 technical information on the Internet obviously.
The UA engineer also mentioned that fuel is loaded on an aircraft so 45
minutes of fuel is left at the end of a flight for safety purposes. In normal
use a 737 is NOT capable of flying from Boston to San Francisco ANYWAY but
including the safety fuel for an extra 45 minutes of flight it definitely
would not be scheduled for a transcontinental trip. United Shuttle uses 737s
for short haul flights. The UA engineer calculated a trip from Boston to New
York City would normally take about 20 minutes. On 9/11 we are told it took
45 minutes. Where was the airliner that left Boston during the missing 25
minutes? Was there a unscheduled change in aircraft? Also where are the bodies of the passengers of these flights?
A prominent Spanish newspaper scientifically analyzed the photos of the 737
airliner as it approached the South WTC Tower AND FOUND:
(1) A bulge on the body under the right wing and
(2) two cylindrical objects along the bottom of the
aircraft. Attachments: Mystery airliner.jpg; airlinerST.jpg
THE BULGE ON THE BODY UNDER THE RIGHT WING is similar to the bulge on the
remote-controlled Predator used in military operations. Attachment predator4.jpg The UA engineer said ON THE PREDATOR the bulge is a cover for the
radar antenna that receives signals from a control station for guidance.
FOR THE NORTH TOWER CRASH a Saab Jet (Attachment 1st.jpg) was the control
station, controlling the airliner as the Saab Jet flow directly above the
airliner in tight formation on the approach to the North Tower but separating moments before the crash by flying over the tower and leaving a sonic
boom on the soundtrack of the documentary, '9/11'.
FOR THE SOUTH TOWER CRASH a military helicopter (Attachment helplume2.jpg)
positioned in front of the South Tower but hidden from ground view in the
smoke plume remote-controlled the airliner into the South Tower.
The Saab Jet function in this crash was to bring the airliner to Manhattan
Island and then turn over remote control to the Military Helicoper.
(NW wind=315,N=0 or
360) 6/16, 8/13,9/11,10/8,10/17 are the only NW wind days from June 1st to
IN FACT, THE PLOTTERS WAITED FOR A CLEAR DAY
WITH A NORTHWEST WIND TO BLOW THE SMOKE PLUME ACROSS THE SOUTH TOWER FROM THE NORTH TOWER. ALL JUST TO HIDE THE MILITARY HELICOPER!! 9/11 WAS THE
IN 9/01 WITH SUCH CONDITIONS. However, both the Saab Jet and the Military
helicopter were captured 'in the act' by the Naudet Brothers (Documentary '9/11', the firemen's video), a NBC news helicopter, and numerous video
IN ADDITION,ACCORDING TO THE SPANISH NEWSPAPER ARTICLE, DURING THE 2ND CRASH TWO CYLINDRICAL OBJECTS were observed along the bottom of the aircraft
body. These bulges are incendiary bombs (IncBombs11.jpg)(750 lbs; 90-100 US gal napalm) that caused the enormous flaming clouds with the crashes.
Napalm in use. Notice the flame color. Compare to WTC crash photos. Attachment Napalm ST.jpg
Specifications of Napalm Bombs (BLU-1/B):
The smoking guns of 911 are the South Tower 737 and its remote-controllers, a Military helicopter and a Saab Jet.
is a collage of photos of the South Tower Boeing 737 smoking gun for your enjoyment.
HERE IS MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ON REMOTE CONTROL GROUND STATIONS. The 737,
757, and 767, being guided by 'fly by wire' instrumentation, which means
wires not hydraulic systems, could easily have their auto-pilot systems
compromised by a bolt-on remote control system such as the state-of-Art
Predator remote control system.
General Atomics 'Remotely Operated
Aircraft Systems' The Predator is the prime example.
The Control Stations are of 3 types:
1. GCS Ground control station With satellite capability
2. High Mobility Ground control station
3. Portable GCS.
I quote:" A portable GCS is also available, providing mobile units the
ability to control the aircraft and receive valuable intelligence from the
field." It is reasonable to believe that THE SAAB JET and the MILITARY
HELICOPTER served as portable control stations on 9/11.