Get your facts right before making accusations pal. I'm not on anybodys side, I dont work for anybody, and that aint useless psudoscientific BS it's
stuff from my research notes that I thought I'd post in case it's of use to anyone here. I tried to simplify it a bit so people can understand it
but still get accusations thrown at me.
I'll tell you where I got this info from, 2 years of almost non-stop research after a friend nearly died. The highly toxic treatments seemed to have
cured her and no trace of it was detected. Unfortunately years later it came back and I didnt know she was ill untill I heard she'd died a couple of
weeks ago. So all the info was of no use. So dont accuse me of being part of any conspiracy, I'm just posting what I know.
Strange how the first drug mentioned, developed by scientists, is claimed to be a miracle cure (I haven't researched that specific drug so I can't
comment) but anything else thats mentioned the scientists are evil conspiritors. These are not highly toxic drugs like chemo or radiotheraphy which
attack the body in the hope that more cancer cells die than normal cells, these are specificlly targeted treatments to destroy cancer by various
means, either by cutting off its ability to get new blood supply or targeted toxins that leave healthy cells alone or enable the immune system to
detect and destroy.
Oh, and all the treatments I was talking about yes they are ways of killing it, not just managing it. Dont know much about america's FDA, I imagine
theyre the same as the UK equivelant. Yes, they could make money from drugs companies but what I'm saying is the USA government may not let them if
the economy as a whole would suffer unless they get some benefit out of it too, which is why I asked about value added tax.
[edit on 21-5-2007 by KeithD]
[edit on 21-5-2007 by KeithD]





