posted on May, 14 2007 @ 10:39 AM
Maybe I'm getting my forums confused, but I read a thread almost identical to this a few days ago -- the thread commenced in almost identical
fashion: by blaming the parents.
I followed it through several pages and one post was noteworthy: it detailed the experiences of an Irish man who, with his family, had holidayed a
year or so earlier in either the same town as the one in which the little girl under discussion disappeared, or a similar holiday destination.
The Irishman stated that he on his return to the UK, he had gone on a radio talk-show to tell his story and to warn other parents.
Apparently, the Irishman and his family had rented a villa in a small Portuguese town. They were having a lovely holiday. Felt very safe. Then, one
night, his young daughter (also blonde-haired, blue-eyed, around four years old) ran and awakened him. She'd been awoken by noises in her room.
The father went to investigate. He subsequently discovered that an intruder had broken into the villa as the family slept and from all the items in
the villa had taken the father's passport and some of his clothes. These were discovered in a bag (in the child's room I think) and had obviously
discarded by the intruder during his escape after the father went to investigate.
It was clear someone had 'cased' the Irish family prior to the break-in. It was clear also that the Irishman's daughter had been selected for
abduction by someone who intended to pose as the child's father after taking her.
The Irishman said he and his family had ended their holiday and departed the village the next morning.
From this, it becomes clear that the abduction of 'selected' children is planned and executed by those prepared to stop at nothing. They're so
brazen, they'll enter a dwelling in which the child's parents are only metres away.
Obviously, the perpetrators study the family and familiarise themselves with the internal lay-out of the dwelling. Either that, or they're already
familiar with it. They familiarise themselves with the family's habits and routines. They probably follow them around, observing and noting when
the parents rise, go to bed, take their meals, go shopping, etc.
The parents, who're on holiday, are not as organised as they would be when at home, not as observant. The holiday atmosphere usually results in
people having a false sense of security. Staff at hotels, shops, restaurants etc. are usually polite and obliging. When on holiday and surrounded by
friendly, polite staff and local inhabitants, people tend to trust strangers more than they would on their home-ground. They lower their guard; they
relax.
There's a strong possibility that the abductors work on 'contract' basis: they steal children to order for pedophiles or other sub-humans.
The abductor commits the crime for gain; for money. The child represents money to them; is an object to be stolen and sold on.
There's a great deal of unemployment in Europe; great desperation. Migrants from North Africa for example, make their way to seemingly prosperous
countries such as Portugal, Spain and France, in the belief they'll enjoy a much higher standard of living. When their dreams fail, they resort to
desperate measures; child-stealing possibly being one of these.
Only luck and a noise which woke the Irishman's little girl, saved her from a dreadful fate. Dressed in her father's clothes and brandishing her
father's passport, the kidnapper would have posed as the child's father. The child was included on her father's passport. If she'd cried or
tried to run away from the kidnapper, people would have simply believed she was being difficult and would not have been suspicious when the kidnapper
tucked her under his arm and boarded a plane or train or ferry. The kidnappers may even give their victims a sedative in a drink, to make them more
manageable. Within hours, using the true father's passport, they could take the child halfway across Europe, while the police would still be
fumbling around looking for clues in the parent's rented villa. The parents would be top of the list of suspects. The police would concentrate on
them, first and foremost, and this would use up valuable hours and days. The kidnappers are aware of this. It's all very callous and calculated.
Those who're prepared to plan and execute the abduction of a child are ruthless and determined. A lot of money changes hands. Behind it are very
powerful, wealthy perverts with reputations and a great deal else to lose. They have no intention of being caught and paraded before a revolted
public. Money greases palms all along the route: police, investigators, those in the legal profession, etc.
If they simply wanted a child, they could easily obtain one as unfortunately, young children are available everywhere; parks, schools, in alley-ways
and back-gardens, shopping malls, train and bus stations and rejected and alone in any town and city.
But these wealthy and powerful perverts aren't satisfied with such easy pickings; their twisted needs demand a 'valued' child, one stolen at great
risk and transported across borders clandestinely while the distraught parents and law-enforcement agencies appeal for the child's return on
national/international media. Children obtained in such a manner obviously provide an extra element of 'enjoyment' and 'excitement' for these
jaded, inhuman monsters.
Possibly, we can ascertain that these monsters are not European, because they favour 'white' children: blue-eyed, fair-haired and fair-skinned
European babies.
What precautions can parents take to safeguard their children's safety when monsters like this are prepared to break in to steal a child from its own
bed while the parents are only metres away?