"The Missing Bees Explained" Hoagland's Groundbreaking Theory., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 13-5-2007 @ 03:09 AM by greatlakes
Richard C. Hoagland -Hyperdimensional Bees-ART BELL Coast to Coast Show, 5-12-07

Hoaglands explanation of the Bee Disappearance is complex and unlike no other causes that have come up so far I believe. The C2C show link...

www.coasttocoastam.com...

This is what I gathered from the coast to coast show tonight:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It all has to do with the "Torsion Field Effect"

This effect is is from the rotation of any body IN CONJUNCTION with another movement or force in another direction. This other movement or force is a vibrational in nature. These two movements, the rotation and the vibrational, causes the Torsion Field Effect. This effect can be seen in a gyroscope or in a planet body such as the Earth.

So What the Torsion Effect Does to the Bees?

The effect creates a frequency that can be measured. The frequency is very small but in relation to the background noise, is relatively large, thus it can be measured and recorded according to Hoagland. This frequency in turn affects the bees in that the bees build the honeycomb hives according to the frequency and are sensitive to any changes.



A CHANGE in the frequency has caused the bees to build homes that the bees are not tuned to and with the frequency change, bees either DONT RETURN purposely, or cannot return due to lack of homing frequency to find their way home.

Why or What is Causing the Frequency Change?

Thats the big question. Hoagland believes that it is caused by the solar system approaching the GALACTIC CENTER plane, or the GALACTIC ecliptic. Even thought the galaxy, our milky way is huge, the center plane could be extremely thin. So this is causing solar system changes, and frequency changes due to the torsion effect.

EARTH CROSSES GALACTIC CENTER>>TORSION FIELD EFFECT FREQUENCY CHANGES >>BEES ARE THE CANARY IN THE COAL MINE



Pluto is getting warmer, Neptune is changing, mars is changing. This could be due to added energy into the planetary systems. Is this from the Sun? No, it seems to be coming from somewhere else, since Earth would be affected hugely if the sun was adding significant energy to far away bodies such as Pluto.

Hoagland has gone as far to measure changes in the frequency of the Earth in events such as eclipses and planet alignments via a tiny tuning fork and amplified via computer system.

He also states that this is a NORTHERN HEMISPHERE ONLY ISSUE. Why? The torsion field physics is asymmetric only effect. Thus Europe, the USA etc are affected, whereas Australia is NOT AFFECTED.

Thats my take of the C2C show, I think this offers an amazing reason for the bee problem. He plans on posting his papers on his site soon hopefully. Here is Hoagland's site:

www.enterprisemission.com...

Now here is some information on Torsion Field Physics:
en.wikipedia.org...
amasci.com...

Questions and follow-ups?

  • Can this be affecting Humans?
  • Can this affect other animals?
  • What is affecting the planets, mainly our planet? (its not SUV's)




    [edit on 13-5-2007 by greatlakes]

    mod edit, to reduce image

    [edit on 18-5-2007 by DontTreadOnMe]


    • reply posted on 21-5-2007 @ 08:16 AM by Byrd
    Originally posted by fiftyfifty
    "The ultimate drivers are changes in our landscapes; intensive agriculture, extensive use of pesticides, drainage, nitrogen deposition.

    "All of these factors favour subsets of plants and subsets of bees.

    "And if you want to prevent them you have to look at the ecosystem level, protecting the habitat and the groups of species."

    Source

    Maybe it could be the impact we have on them??? It doesn't always have to be some crazy out there theory.


    BBC is correct -- we do a lot of things to our landscape. Changes in the average temperature of the Earth also affect what parasites hit the honeybees. Some of the dead colonies have huge infestations of variola mites (according to beekeeping boards.) We have always been in the "galactic plane" and to blame it on vibes or unknown radiation is not good science.

    There are a number of things that influence the situation -- thankfully people are becoming more interested in the problem.


    reply posted on 21-5-2007 @ 08:19 PM by yuefo
    I have mixed opinions of Hoagland. On some things I think he's right, e.g., NASA's intransigense regarding reimaging anomalies like the shard and cube on the moon, and strange areas on mars such as the banyan trees, which would be an interesting mission for a probe rather than the usual rock-strewn plain. He is correct that JPL sets the geology space agenda rather than exobiologists, and the public (the funders) are bored. There is all kinds of evidence that NASA willfully hides signs of extraterrestrial life, including intelligent life (Shuttle videos). I also find some of his planetary analyses fascinating, e.g., his 4-part Iapetus study.

    On the other hand, he always seems to go out of his way to step over the edge of credibility, e.g., the Egyptian obsession he insists NASA builds into their missions. Or rocks on mars that he thinks looks like "Data's head," machinery, temples, etc. One thing he never learned from the Cydonia fiasco was to not overwork the evidence. He created a martian city from evidence insufficient to support his claims, and in the wake of modern imaging, the city has crumbled. Where is the fort? Not there. The face? Looks like a hill. Pyramids? Look natural. Having learned nothing and nothing much to lose, the fiasco continues. Look, absolute proof of a crashed flying saucer! Second imaging, whoops, it's a boulder. It isn't wrong for him to look for these things; the trouble is the certainty he habitually adopts with regard to scant evidence.

    He seems to me to have the heart and imagination of an explorer, but not the discipline of a scientist. Maybe he jumps to all the conclusions he does in the hopes that by chance one of his theories will be proven correct, at which time he can claim authorship before more cautious, pragmatic researchers. If it's fame and fortune Hoagland is seeking, he's going about it at substantial detriment to his reputation and credibility.
    Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



    Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
      Posted 7 days ago with 175 member flags
    Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
      Posted 14 days ago with 146 member flags
    Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
      Posted 3 days ago with 127 member flags
    Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
      Posted 4 days ago with 120 member flags
    6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
      Posted 8 days ago with 107 member flags
    West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
      Posted 5 days ago with 85 member flags
    CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
      Posted 11 days ago with 75 member flags
    Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
      Posted 15 days ago with 73 member flags