It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Royal76
-North America Union- In progress. Soon the illegals of Mexico in America will be legal citizens of NAU. United States, Mexico, Canada, will share the same laws, money, etc.
- Middle Eastern Union- will join, or will be forced to do so. Babyalon reborn.
-Central America Union-Beginning Progress. Progress slowed by so many different government to work with.
-South American Union-Almost done.
-Asian Union- In progress, all that needs to be decided is if Russia joins this or EU.
-African Union-Could take some time. Unless the elite can convince global community that Africa need to be taken over for the good of the people.
Originally posted by detonator
Yes i agree. Americans own guns for local violence only. I bet there would be no significant resistance to government if they decide to take few last freedoms away. Who resisted torture bill? Who resisted bill which allows them them search your house and arrest entire family without a warrant? And when someone mentions gun control they immediately jump and say we need them to protect freedom. Freedom of crime on streets? Because i don't see you are using them for anything else.
Originally posted by Eyeofhorus
Phase three-
realization that I am out of toilet paper.
Originally posted by Kacen
I think a "New World Order" would be awesome, its just that due to conspiracy theorists the phrase "New World Order" seems to have rather negative connotations, for some reason. I don't understand why. Its a fairly general term, it doesn't specify what type of government or whether it will be oppressive or not.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
Originally posted by Kacen
I think a "New World Order" would be awesome, its just that due to conspiracy theorists the phrase "New World Order" seems to have rather negative connotations, for some reason. I don't understand why. Its a fairly general term, it doesn't specify what type of government or whether it will be oppressive or not.
It would be bad, because it is the ultimate means of control.
We do not need government or money, they are status quo tools. Humans are quite capable of being peaceful and in harmony by following natures laws, and not made up ones that our "leaders" have created.
Any form of power will be abused by those who feel no empathy towards others. That will never change.
Originally posted by detonator
Yes i agree. Americans own guns for local violence only. I bet there would be no significant resistance to government if they decide to take few last freedoms away. Who resisted torture bill? Who resisted bill which allows them them search your house and arrest entire family without a warrant? And when someone mentions gun control they immediately jump and say we need them to protect freedom. Freedom of crime on streets? Because i don't see you are using them for anything else.
Originally posted by Royal76
Phase One
Join the various areas of the world into a few sections.
- Europeon Union- Europe check
-North America Union- In progress. Soon the illegals of Mexico in America will be legal citizens of NAU. United States, Mexico, Canada, will share the same laws, money, etc.
Originally posted by Kacen
And if what your predicting is true, tell me...why is this a bad thing?
I think a "New World Order" would be awesome, its just that due to conspiracy theorists the phrase "New World Order" seems to have rather negative connotations, for some reason. I don't understand why. Its a fairly general term, it doesn't specify what type of government or whether it will be oppressive or not.
original by Eyeofhorus
Question one. Why does the organization of the NWO only have three phases? Could it be a progression of one long phase? There are 7 continents shouldn't there be seven phases?
Question two. What is the point of the NWO, where are you going with your thought? The question is not IF it happens, but when and why?
Question three. Why is there no cohesive evidence in your post? You seem to be convinced something is progressing, where are you drawing your conclusion? (or lack of one for that matter)
Question four-If the phases do number three, then wouldn't the formation of the NWO need a new set of phases to complete its agenda? So wouldn't there technically be an infinite number of phases?
Question five. Can you grab me some toilet paper from the hallway closet?