posted on May, 11 2007 @ 06:14 AM
This simply makes me furious. The fakery is so blatant.
And the daring to use the idea that falling debris could somehow do that sort and amount of damage to the corner, load-bearing structure of a
steel-framed highrise. Simply impossible, beyond any reason.
Yes, in the third picture, you see a terraced appendage with similar damage, but that is an addition to the basic box/load-bearing structure, and
therefore does not need to be heavily re-enforced.
The web of steel columns, beams and trusses on that corner of WTC 7 simply could not be damaged in that way--unless you used Judy Wood's ray gun to
vaporize it. Simply beyond belief, the gall of it.
And stepping back to another level, how can people accept that a building collapse--straight down--even of the WTC towers--would or properly should
cause such damage to buildings so far off-site?
Implausibility on top of implausibility. Lie on top of lie.
Again, simply furious.
BTW, CL: the supposedly damaged corner is that to the southwest. And your link is broken.
[edit on 11-5-2007 by gottago]