Originally posted by The Cyfre

Originally posted by RWPBR
We survived 8 years with the reprobate Arkansas trailer park reject Clinton...7 years of Bush is a walk in the park.

How many troops died on Clinton's watch?

Not many considering every time troops died Clinton pulled out with his tail between his legs like in Somalia.

Lets compare Presidencies:

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia - good...
Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad...
Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good...
Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - bad...
Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good...
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...
Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists - good...
Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad...
Clinton bombs Chinese embassy - good....
Bush bombs terrorist camps - bad....
Clinton commits felonies while in office - good...
Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit - bad...
Clinton says mass graves in Serbia - good...
Entire world says WMD in Iraq - bad...
Stock market crashes in 2000 under Clinton - good...
Recession under Bush - bad...
Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good...
World Trade Centers fall under Bush - Bad...
Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good...
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad...
Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton - good...
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan - bad...
No mass graves found in Serbia - good...
No WMD found Iraq - bad...
Milosevic in Custody but not yet convicted - good...
Saddam in custody and hanged - bad...

Avenger, are you as crazed as your avatar, or just being devious? Why not go ahead and break down those numbers you put up? Start by admitting that your numbers are all who died in active service, EVEN natural causes and accidents and so forth. And that these numbers are NOT related to a war per se, but include all military everywhere, including inside the USA.

See boys and girls, never trust those pesky Republicans, they can't help twisting the truth. The fact is, there is no difference between them and the Democrats except the reverse coloration of the stripe from their head to tail.

Thankfully, I'm an anarchist.

Strangerous, let me apologize on behalf of my nation for the buffoon we have in the Oval Office. No matter what may have taken place in our past, those differences are long dead. Our two nations have current problems that we share, that overshadow whatever was done 400 years ago.

No matter the position one holds for royalty, she is still a lady, and this was trifling on the part of our President to behave in such a boorish manner. One always hopes that we will find a lees moronic symbol for our top office in the future.

Originally posted by NGC2736
Thankfully, I'm an anarchist...

Our two nations have current problems that we share, that overshadow whatever was done 400 years ago.

Do anarchists learn basic math because the American Revolution was only
about 230 years ago...

Didn't Milosevic die before his trial? Ulcers and a guilty conscious got him.

The President (GW) is just being himself now. Politicians usually relax
and become their real selves before retiring as he'll be doing in 2008.
George Bush put on a front, just like most politicans do, in order to
sucker (er..I mean CONVINCE) people to vote for them. The curtain
on his show is coming down now, and GW is free to be GW.

Hillary, Barack, or whoever gets elected next will go through the same
phases if the the American people give her/him two terms. I don't know
why all of you are so surprised by the many variances of human nature
and feel that you're superior enough to judge a fellow human being. But
I guess that's human nature too!...LOL.

I always thought this was a handsign symbolizing the letter W, starting in the 2000 presidential elections.

That's not to say two things stand out from this visit:

1) Both the British Royal crown and the Bush families are high level masons.

2) This visit by the royal family coincides exactly with the end of term of U.K.'s Prime Minister Tony Blair. Blair was coerced into playing along with the above elite's geopolitical plans since 9/11, unfortunately casting a shadow over his legacy. The reunion of the Anglosaxon elite in Washington celebrates the fact that they kept poodle Blair properly in check. After all, something resembling a decent coalition in the war on terror and in Iraq is mainly thanks to him.

[edit on 10-5-2007 by Thodeph]

Originally posted by vor78

Originally posted by scientist
please post a link that says otherwise: but I dont think Bush ever went to the University of Texas, therefore making this whole Hook Em Longhorns! explanation lose all credibility.

besides, hes not even from Texas, hes from upscale Connecticut, went to school in Massachusetts, and then again Connecticut (Yale). The Bush family are all blue bloods, i dont understand how anyone can think of Bush as a Texan.

I can't disagree with most of that, however, I would have to ask one question: Is it a requirement that he have attended UT to be a fan of the school or their teams?

well there was 2 parts to my comment. first, i mentioned that he never went to UT, because it would make sense why he constantly flashes the sign, even in non-sport related events. Why would he be flashing a college sports symbol at all of these different (some very serious) events? What's next, senators start wearing jerseys to represent their favorite teams?

The second part of my comment was just regarding how he likes to play cowboy, while in fact he was born and raised with a silver spoon in his mouth, in new england.

Grabbing at straws, aren't you? Texans are proud of their heritage. What is wrong with that?

grabbing at straws? how about putting words into my mouth - what did I say was wrong with being Texan? You have no idea how ridiculous that sounds, as I am from TX myself. Bush is not. Are you pro-Bush or something? If so, I hope it's not because you thought he was a Texan.

And your comments regarding servants to the Queen are ironic, considering the comparison - Bush and his Bushies.

Bush families are high level masons.

source?

[edit on 10-5-2007 by scientist]

Originally posted by Reality Hurts

I understand it, but don't get so riled and emotional.

This was your monarch on our soil. Should their roles have been reversed, meaning our President visiting your Queen, then yes, even I would have been insulted. However, if it was a Presidential visit to England, I am sure that the proper people would have been insistent enough that he wouldn't have been so cavalier.

Listen, I like your damp little island. Been there on more than a few occasions and like the people a lot. I respect the reverence you have not only for your Queen (who has earned it), but for the title itself. However, when she is here, expect a little irreverence on occasion, regardless of who is our President.

And I like your country too and all those jolly fat people who waddle around so amusingly.

This is about how hosts behave towards their guests, not how your oaf of a President behaves wherever he is!

I think what you're saying is that we'd be gracious hosts and not do anything to embarass your head of state whereas your president hasn't the brains or the breeding to reciprocate.

Your loss, our feeling of moral superiority intact

Avenger, I am not a dem, please don't use that kind of foul language towards me. I am as independent as they get.

And I never said that none died. Just pointedly pointing out that it's not nice to twist numbers, even if it's to make a point.

I doubt there's been a time in the last 80 years when some troops haven't been getting killed somewhere.

So let's be fair, they're all the same, and sadly, it seems that it will be that way next time too.

Pro Bull, the first act of 'breaking away was not in 1776, though learning it by rote in the fifth grade is hard to overcome. Despite the fact that the original colonies were led by very loyal people, it was the feeling of escape that was paramount in the vast majority of those who came to this shore in what is now Virginia, almost exactly 400 years ago.

Do you somehow think the act of severing ties is an all at once event the same way bull riders get thrown to the prairie pies? It was a generational event, and very slow.

But if you insist on the exact dating of the formal separation, then your numbers match closer than mine. My idea was more in the sense of being absent of the daily context of a crowned head of state.

And yes, my math is fine, in my younger years I chose saddle and bareback so as not to addle my wits for later use and wind up a republican.

Originally posted by hikix
its because he is a satan worshiper. The queen is also a satan worshipper, and apparently a reptile. Now the queen is way higher on the draconian scale then bush is, so bush is giving this symbol as his pledge of alliegance to her.

Anyone got a CT more hardcore then that??

I've heard some crap in my life, I'm also not a royalist, but this takes the cake.

Originally posted by Mukiwa

Originally posted by hikix
its because he is a satan worshiper. The queen is also a satan worshipper, and apparently a reptile. Now the queen is way higher on the draconian scale then bush is, so bush is giving this symbol as his pledge of alliegance to her.

Anyone got a CT more hardcore then that??

I've heard some crap in my life, I'm also not a royalist, but this takes the cake.

That does take the icing so how does one become a reptile then, and move up in ranks and if bush was a extra terrestrial was dosent he have a way above average I.Q. and how did the queen become a reptile.

[edit on 11-5-2007 by pak88]

[edit on 11-5-2007 by pak88]

Some of this is just humour folks.

Did I spell humor in the correct British manner?

Originally posted by pak88

Originally posted by Mukiwa

Originally posted by hikix
its because he is a satan worshiper. The queen is also a satan worshipper, and apparently a reptile. Now the queen is way higher on the draconian scale then bush is, so bush is giving this symbol as his pledge of alliegance to her.

Anyone got a CT more hardcore then that??

I've heard some crap in my life, I'm also not a royalist, but this takes the cake.

That does take the icing so how does one become a reptile then, and move up in ranks and if bush was a extra terrestrial was dosent he have a way above average I.Q. and how did the queen become a reptile.

[edit on 11-5-2007 by pak88]

[edit on 11-5-2007 by pak88]

well bush is just trying to act as human as possible. The queen has been living for thousands of years switching bodies everytime her "human" body dies. She is a winged draco, they are the highest species on earth... the order goes something like this

winged draco
Reptilian
Hybrid Reptilian
Grey
Human
Cow

or something like that

damn, ive been reading too many david icke books!

Does anyone think that maybe he just has a bugger on his finger and is in the process of flicking it off?

See he is actively rolling it on his palm so it gets dry enough to flick onto the floor...

Sounds reasonable to me..




Semper

Originally posted by hikix

Originally posted by pak88

Originally posted by Mukiwa

Originally posted by hikix
its because he is a satan worshiper. The queen is also a satan worshipper, and apparently a reptile. Now the queen is way higher on the draconian scale then bush is, so bush is giving this symbol as his pledge of alliegance to her.

Anyone got a CT more hardcore then that??

I've heard some crap in my life, I'm also not a royalist, but this takes the cake.

That does take the icing so how does one become a reptile then, and move up in ranks and if bush was a extra terrestrial was dosent he have a way above average I.Q. and how did the queen become a reptile.

[edit on 11-5-2007 by pak88]

[edit on 11-5-2007 by pak88]

well bush is just trying to act as human as possible. The queen has been living for thousands of years switching bodies everytime her "human" body dies. She is a winged draco, they are the highest species on earth... the order goes something like this

winged draco
Reptilian
Hybrid Reptilian
Grey
Human
Cow

or something like that

damn, ive been reading too many david icke books!

That makes a little sense but i thought David icke dosent believe in satan or god just extra terrastrial so how is that a satanic hand gesture?

Originally posted by clearmind
hmmm, i wonder what hand signs hilary will use when she continues the bush/clinton dynasty of the U.S. white house.

This was the series of facial expressions Hillary demonstrated after she read your statement :0

and How are they satan worshippers if there is no entity called satan?

Originally posted by mecheng
I've seen a lot of websites showing Bush giving the "Diablo" or devil sign and the explanation given is that since he's from Texas he's giving the University of Texas Longhorns "hook-em-longhorns" salute.


Another thing, he never went to school there. Why would he have any allegiance to UT other than him being from Texas (kids maybe?).

Ummm...well,

First of all, he's not from Texas, he's from Conn.

In other words, he's a carpetbagger.

And that pretty much shoots down the notion of loyalty or support for the Longhorns.

First of all i have to say awsome pictures of hillary man its a 1000 laughs.
anyway bush looks to me like he's just scratching away at his dry skin on his fingers you try it you will get the same result and as for the first lady well her hand is probably cramped from doing her job keeping them interns away lol