Liberals Reveal Their Agenda: Mass Murder!?!

First liberals said they were against food biogenetically altered to feed billions. They banned DDT so poor nations would be faced with malaria. They refuse to make cleaning the blood supply necessary for nations getting money for AIDS.

How far away are we before we start hearing calls for sterilization, the elimination of the poor?

Take a look at these words from a head of Greenpeace. Is this the "Al Gore solution", too?

Mass murder on a scale almost unimaginable- to HELP the poor.

Apparently, saving the whales is more important than saving 5.5 billion people. Paul Watson, founder and president of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and famous for militant intervention to stop whalers, now warns mankind is "acting like a virus" and is harming Mother Earth.



Watson's May 4 editorial asked the question "The Beginning of the End for Life as We Know it on Planet Earth?" Then he left no doubt about the answer. "We are killing our host the planet Earth," he claimed and called for a population drop to less than 1 billion.



The commentary reminded readers that Watson had called humans a disease before and he wasn't sorry. "I was once severely criticized for describing human beings as being the 'AIDS of the Earth.' I make no apologies for that statement," the column continued.



Watson was invoking the worst of Robert Malthus, an English political economist who claimed that mankind was overpopulating the earth. That claimed first appeared in the late 1700s. Watson urged some solutions for mankind as part of a process to "need to re-wild the planet":



· "No human community should be larger than 20,000 people and separated from other communities by wilderness areas." New York, London, Paris, Moscow are all too big. Then again, so are Moose Jaw, Timbuktu and even Annapolis, Md.

· "We need vast areas of the planet where humans do not live at all and where other species are free to evolve without human interference."

· "We need to radically and intelligently reduce human populations to fewer than one billion."

· "Sea transportation should be by sail. The big clippers were the finest ships ever built and sufficient to our needs. Air transportation should be by solar powered blimps when air transportation is necessary."

· At least Watson was generous and said people could still talk with one another across great distances. "Communication systems can link the communities," he proclaimed from on high.



The Watson rant kept on going calling for everything from cutting down on the population of domesticated dogs and cats to cutting down on everything else in what he called "simplify, simplify, simplify."



Watson essentially called for humans to return to primitive lifestyles. "We need to stop flying, stop driving cars, and jetting around on marine recreational vehicles. The Mennonites survive without cars and so can the rest of us."




[edit on 9-5-2007 by Psychomike]

Well I am more along the lines of conservative..

And I support this idea 100%.. except I believe this guy wanted a 1 world government, that is not needed imo and would fail anyways.

However I support population reduction by at least 90%. Think of it as a "start over" back to the ways we once where..

Originally posted by Rockpuck
Well I am more along the lines of conservative..

And I support this idea 100%.. except I believe this guy wanted a 1 world government, that is not needed imo and would fail anyways.

However I support population reduction by at least 90%. Think of it as a "start over" back to the ways we once where..

I have to agree with you here, Rockpuck.
There are no links listed, just the OP opinion, so it's hard to know exactly what was said, but I see no mention of murder in this info. And where did the idea that only liberals support this come from?
Sources please. Thank you.

Originally posted by Rockpuck
However I support population reduction by at least 90%. Think of it as a "start over" back to the ways we once where..

So Rock, will you be taking yourself out then? To aid in the population reduction?

This isnt a liberal agenda. Its an NWO agenda and both sides are in it up to their elbows. The only difference between the liberal and conservative labels is one will take us to totalitarian control faster than the other. Come to think of it, both seem to be running neck and neck right now.

Originally posted by Terran Blue

Originally posted by Rockpuck
However I support population reduction by at least 90%. Think of it as a "start over" back to the ways we once where..

So Rock, will you be taking yourself out then? To aid in the population reduction?

Course not.

Then I wouldn't support it if I had to go

6 billion is far to many people. Humans, and the worst of our race, breed like rabbits, eventually it will be 12 billion..

One way or another, it ends in mass extermination, naturally or helped along.

Paul Watson says what he says to keep people talking. I'm not sure he believes every outrageous statement he makes...but if I'm not mistaken he also had the cojones to buy a sub and take on the whalers on the high seas. I wouldn't feel too threatened unless you actually do that for a living.

What never ceases to amaze me is people still don't know they are being played like dumb fish , when the reality is that the ruling class is the still ruling class that they'll still carve the masses asses with a democrat or republican scimitar.

Ah well, guess folks deserve to be used like fodder, if they play the role of a fool.

Oh please...like humans are having such a hard time struggling to survive as a specie. Give me a break. In the U.S. these deceitful and irresponsible breeders will simply become another welfare leech that cheats the system and cheats tax payers out of their money. This is no liberal or conservative issue. This is a crime against all hard working americans that support these breeding fools. Population control would be one of the best things to be forcefully implemented on large populations that breed uncontrollably and then wonder why there's nothing left to eat. I am very much against foreign aid of any sort. I have no pity for them. Zero.