|
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:17 PM by spf33
|
   
Originally posted by junglelord
How possible is it for a real pic to be concluded fake based on any set of cirteria?
depends on who's doing the looking.
*Brought to you by the Autodesk, the makers of 3ds Max, Maya and Autocad:
Is it Fake or Foto Challenge
[edit on 22-5-2007 by spf33]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:21 PM by Latitude
|
Originally posted by spf33
good questiion, i already asked him in my thank you email.
waiting to hear back.
asked for generic ip address info too...
Awesome, spf33
Definately 5 star. The common res seems to be 1169x765. Is that because Chad picked this res when he scanned them? About the spots on some of the
pics. Could those be caused by dirt or dust on the scanner glass? What do you make of those?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:27 PM by junglelord
|
quote]
depends on who's doing the looking.
*Brought to you by the Autodesk, the makers of 3ds Max, Maya and Autocad:
Is it Fake or Foto Challenge
[edit on 22-5-2007 by spf33]
thanks I got 7 out of 10
70%, not bad for a amatur
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:32 PM by PsykoOps
|
This also raises one interesting point, the other set of images was taken with a minolta dimage X and this one with a film camera. I'd like to see
high res. scans of the negatives and the original raw files from the other set. If nothing else you could at least make out the writing and other
detail better.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:38 PM by PsykoOps
|
  
One question that I dont think anyone has asked. Two images show bushes with yellow flowers in them, can anyone ID these and tell if they're in
season and where they commonly appear?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:40 PM by spf33
|
ok, Lex says the filenames are original.
He does not have any ip address information for chad.
the original filenames, imageshack alters them slightly;
Picture020.jpg
ScannedImage-2.jpg
ScannedImage-3.jpg
ScannedImage-4.jpg
ScannedImage-5.jpg
ScannedImage.jpg
[edit on 22-5-2007 by spf33]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 04:45 PM by ZikhaN
|
Wow, that's one really freaky-looking UFO. Something tells me it's not fake though, but I guess I'm just too easy to convince.
It looks really cool.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 06:07 PM by moonking
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 06:18 PM by PsykoOps
|
That's not very recent, you can discuss these pictures in more detail here.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 07:48 PM by ImpliedChaos
|
I got 9/10 correct on that link...anyways um..this pic looks completely photoshopped I'm really surprised that people are actually considering this
as a real photo...maybe its just me
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 22-5-2007 @ 08:55 PM by aceace
|
Which would be scarier? A. UFO B. V for Vendetta scenario
How do we know that Aliens from other planets are our size. Maybe the guys flying this ship are like 16 inches tall.
I think it could real but most likely a new drone.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 12:56 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
|
  
Ok folks I would like to thank rwiggins for providing the amazing model. I put this into a feed from the original youtube footage
( www.youtube.com...) and this is what i got. Its still not perfect needs to be worked on a lot, but hey. Still having problems
with motion blur etc. Waaala:
Thanks for the model and help
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 12:59 PM by Jeffery2102
|
wait i'm confused about the model...
did somebody build that and then video tape it? or they did it in cgi?
sorry i need to keep up with this thread a little better.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 01:04 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
|
Originally posted by Jeffery2102
wait i'm confused about the model...
did somebody build that and then video tape it? or they did it in cgi?
sorry i need to keep up with this thread a little better.
Our kind member rwiggins here at ATS provided us a CG model. I then used that CG model to composite it into another video to make it seem like a real
UFO. Im just doing this to show the kind folks here at ATS that, yes there are UFO hoaxers out there, and if I, a person who has never had ANY
professional CG training of any sort can do it, what can the pros come up with.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 01:08 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
|
If anybody has some really sharp hires video that is a short clip about 5 sec or so I would like to make a video of this fake photoshopped craft
flying in the video. Thanks
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 01:12 PM by Stale Cracker
|
THE PROFESSIONAL
Thanks for the vid!!! Brings new meaning to "air guitar"

|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 01:17 PM by THE_PROFESSIONAL
|
Originally posted by Stale Cracker
THE PROFESSIONAL
Thanks for the vid!!! Brings new meaning to "air guitar"

LOL, your welcome.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 01:44 PM by MajesticTwelve
|
Originally posted by spf33
Originally posted by junglelord
How possible is it for a real pic to be concluded fake based on any set of cirteria?
depends on who's doing the looking.
*Brought to you by the Autodesk, the makers of 3ds Max, Maya and Autocad:
Is it Fake or Foto Challenge
[edit on 22-5-2007 by spf33]
The Challenge Results
Excellent! Nine out of ten answers were correct
I was wrong on the car
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 01:44 PM by keeb333
|
Originally posted by PsykoOps
One question that I dont think anyone has asked. Two images show bushes with yellow flowers in them, can anyone ID these and tell if they're in
season and where they commonly appear?
It's a bit hard to tell from the pictures, but they could be forscythia, common in US and blooms in early spring. However, I'm in the southeast,
and it is possible that there are other plants out west that could have a similar appearance.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-5-2007 @ 02:45 PM by verstohlen
|
Something about the photos just doesn't look right. Someone had mentioned that it's too well lit from underneath and sure enough, that's exactly
it. In almost every photo the craft looks as though it is being lit from underneath by some kind of photographic reflectors or white surface. I've
seen many pictures of real aircraft in flight on a sunny day and in those pictures the underside of the aircraft is very dark in contrast to the rest
of it, unlike the craft in these photos.
I took a photo of the strange craft and darkened the underside as to how it should look, with a "before" and "after" picture and to me the craft
looks far more realistic and convincing with the darker underside.
See what you guys think:
So it is of my opinion this is a hoax. I hope I'm wrong, but I doubt it.
[edit on 24-5-2007 by verstohlen]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |