It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

Who Wants a One World Government?

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on May, 10 2007 @ 12:01 AM

America is not the root cause of democratic governments, but the spread of democratic governments is because of America.

I think that is inacurate, the spread of democracy is usualy related to the will of the people, before democracy even existed as a "name" because freedom existed as a meaning but didint have a name , people wanted to be free, people usualy want to be free and have freedoms in general, it's not related to a specific country spreading the idea.
Alot of countrys obtained democracy by their own will not knowing about the outside world, do you think north coreans know how united states is and what democracy is in general? it's forbiten for them to even think of such things, but one thing they know is that they want to be free.

posted on May, 10 2007 @ 04:06 PM

Originally posted by golddragnet

How would you see a 1 world government with no alternative, would it resemble USA, just on a larger scale, well that will suck, corruption just on a larger scale. How how about China, what if the Chinese lead the 1 world govenment, well that will really suck, especially if you practice Felun Gong or want free speech. Or how about the russian model, a country where the mafia rule?

A 1 world government will suck

It should be like the UN but each representative would be elected by popular vote of the country. There should be transparent accounting so all money involved would be public knowledge. That said, I do not believe it will occur soon because contrary to what many think, I suspect there are very powerful banking and corporate interests who like things the way they are now. People tend to look at the media as a passive force but they need to realize that it is one of the most powerful forces on the planet and is being used to engineer the popular opinions of the world by those why do realize its power. Changing the structure of our media is more crucial, in my opinion, than changing the system of governance. As long as there is a handle on the media by which a powerful interest can manipulate what is reported, our own thoughts will be likewise manipulated. For example when the dairy industry pays millions a year in advertising to a network, that network will be loath to report the link between dairy products and diseases like asthma. They do not exist to deliver us news, that is only the means to their end, which it to make advertising money.

posted on Oct, 23 2008 @ 01:39 AM
When a society is in tatters, it is easier to take control over it.

The old "Bomb and Build", if you will.

With no borders, no war--ONE CURRENCY, and very few in control, they have nothing left to gain. They've already conquered everything.
That is the goal.

There are people in this world who do not believe in good and evil. They only believe in wealth and power. This is more common among people born into wealthy families.

If the world came together peacefully to form one government, that would be a beautiful and wonderful thing.

But when a bunch of psychopaths run a very influential country and seek to use their power to conquer and control, you've got problems.

posted on Apr, 11 2013 @ 03:36 PM
I do, I do, I do. We gotta have a World Government to go on to our destiny: the stars.

posted on Apr, 16 2013 @ 08:03 AM
Me Too...

new topics

top topics
<< 1  2   >>

log in