posted on Oct, 18 2007 @ 06:12 AM
Hi, new member beating a very very dead horse, but iv read every page on this topic over the past few hours, used every single piece of software I
have access to, and have come to these conclusions about the videos presently viewable on the before mentioned youtube account.
The "Apollo 20 launch video" is NOT FAKE! I know what some of you are thinking/screaming into your monitors, but I have proof! With, I kid you
not, a 0.00% chance of error, the clip "Apollo 20" launch is infact the Apollo 11 launch. Absolutely everything matched for one of the many views
of this oh so publicized event. The flame pattern, color, sky glow, burn noise, radio chatter, even the "USA" writen in red on the side of the
Saturn V rocket. The frames from the video of a rocket on tower was a Saturn 1B, no doubt about it. The preflight brief is just the same pictures
you all have been kicking around put in a slide show.
Alexei Leonov, the only guy we can find information on in this story, was in charge of a training facility in russia at the time. Now this can be
taken two ways, that there is no way he could have gone unnoticed for so long to train for such a mission, OR seeing as how it was a training facility
itself, they could have just trained there. If it did happen, it was a big high-five for the russians im sure, seeing as how they had been grooming
Leonov to be the first Russian on the moon for years. And yes, I understand it actualy adds credit to the story, in that the "Apollo 18" mission
was a sort of interview to see if the russians and americans could work together, which, for a mission like this, Leonov would be their top pick. It
also makes sense that a russian and an american would be the ones to do it, seeing as how there is no way in hell your going to get a rocket to the
moon and back without the russians noticing. Pretty clever for a hoaxer. If you subscribe to the theory that the cold war was actualy just a PR
cover for massive defence research and arms build up incase aliens attacked us, it would make sense the russians would send one of their own for a
Now the mission itself. Remember, they somehow supposedly got on this "alien craft" which appears over a mile long and retrieved a... I believe he
called her a non-living person who was not dead... anyway, they got into this craft and kidnapped an alien zombie and took a head as a suvinear before
hightailing it out. Not sure where they would have reenterd, but with the russians helping that wouldent be a problem.
Now the main video.. the fly over.. I am truely not sure what to make of it. its such a complex and mind blowingly real thing while at the same time
lifting flags as a complete and utter hoax. the lense flares are clearly not natural, but the physics of the movement, the color shifts the landscape
its all dead on. With the number of official photos showing an anomaly, i just cant help but wonder, maybe its the grain of truth in a sea of
lets count them:
launch video, lie.
"white room" clearly fake, though very complex
preflight, slideshow, easy fake.
"city", mind-numbingly fake
flyover, shows signs of crappy CGI work, shows two frames for no reason which could easily have been edited out which both times identify it as apollo
11, while the actual flyover part shows it to not be... and the flyover itself... well i already coverd that.
its as if this guy went to such great lengths for the flyover clip. he found an anomaly, he got high res pictures of it and recreated it in a near
perfect model, flimed a flyover, made sure to time it just right for lunar orbit, then made sure it moved the right way, jolted the right way, a true
piece of art, and a story to match, a true lifes work. then he piled s*** on it and tossed it to us. Would it be possible to take a real video and
edit it to look like a crappy fake? As in, the fly over is real, but made to look hoaxy, grouped with the very obviouse fakes to discredit?