It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhotrod
look at the lower grey control box on the right, look at the closing locks and the little black "slit" or whatever it is on the lid. compare to the real thing, its different. so either it is a prop they didnt get quite right, or its footage from a second "vandenberg launch pad" like you seem to believe.
watch what happens, when the "astronaut" bumps his head...
whos that african american teenage engineer wunderkind?
Did "THEY" make "L. Marietta Snyder", the first female astronaut, who was never trained as such, and nobody heard from before or after, disappear like Jimmy Hoffa?
Where was Leonov really at the time when this supposedly happened?
Edit: the width of the room does not match
[edit on 21-6-2007 by jhotrod]
Originally posted by jhotrod
In my opinion only 3 scenarios are possible:
1. retiredafb is a wealthy hoaxer that can spend as much time on this project as he wants. He is an Apollo program enthusiast. He has at least basic knowledge of traditional animation, .....
....ever designed for the saturn rockets.
6. alien writing - could be anything, looks a bit like Tolkien elvish writing
I am amazed how much money and time went into this, especially into the alien ship and white room footage. But its hoaxed anyway.
Originally posted by SpaceBits
Sorry but you never mention you were a pro with video editing and processeing nor do you provide anything to back up your thery.
If your going to say for sure it's a fake or real, please provide proof to either, we dont need waisted posts that repeat the same point that its fake because of motion blur.
and explain why the image at 5:25 is behind the camra, this may prove it to be a hoax or real... because that i dont think it was put in there on purpose because you dont see it very well. It's a reflection of something.
I wish i could upload a screen shot i have of it out lined.
Originally posted by Dantes
Regarding the markings, the number 50 written on the inside of the ship.
To me this is the weakest part of the clip. In order for the markings to be stationary while the camera is shaking left and right, the only possible explanation would be that the numbers are written on the lens of the camera itself, or on a glass connected to the camera somwehow. But then the numbers would have to be visible at all times, and in the clip, they disappear for 11 seconds and then mysteriously reappear.
My conclusion is that the markings consists of a separate layer added on to the original video, which is probobly of a small scale model.
Is there any other possible explaination for the sudden disappearence and later fade-in of the markings?
Originally posted by olegkvasha
i have been askin the guy some questions about the launch... he has replied with a few so when i get the lot i will put his answers on here
CSM 16mm footage through the AGC lens, made by Leona Snyder $& lunar orbit revolutions. Camera is fixed on the eyepiece of the telescope, less dropouts or moves than the Tv feed from the LM. Frame transfer is not perfect,speed is faster than actual, 4 different speeds were used on the 16 mm camera. The landing site is visible on the lower right part in the first lunar sequence.
sorry for the first viewers and commenters, i had to upload again with a better codec.