|
reply posted on 9-6-2007 @ 09:41 PM by antar
|
Excellent Bspiracy! I can't believe I went over to a thread of mine to bring this exact footage over (minus the great report to accompany) to
hopefully shed some physical evidence to the validity of the footage as seen above. I am down with this one being real real real.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-6-2007 @ 10:56 PM by disownedsky
|
The fact that there was never an Apollo 20 kind of gives it away as a hoax from the gitgo, eh?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-6-2007 @ 11:09 PM by Implosion
|
Originally posted by disownedsky
The fact that there was never an Apollo 20 kind of gives it away as a hoax from the gitgo, eh?
You know how many people have said that already?
Videos of the boldest and most secret apollo mission. Apollo 20 went to the moon august 16 1976.
Source.
It's presented as a secret mission. Therefore "NASA said it didn't happen" brings absolutely nothing to the table whatsoever.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 03:37 PM by jimbo999
|
Hmmm...it's not much to go on - but good work. Say, wouldn't 'RetiredAFB' for a handle imply that he is retired from the Airforce? That's what
I'd assume anyhow..
Jimbo999
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 03:39 PM by jimbo999
|
Well, just because it has 'landing gear' doesn't mean it didn't crash though. I mean - the Space Shuttle had landing gear didn't it?
Jimbo999
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 03:42 PM by jimbo999
|
Still - they both look essentially like the SAME object, don't you think???
Jimbo999
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 03:43 PM by jimbo999
|
Originally posted by Mukiwa
Originally posted by mystr
Hello, here's a zoom of nasa www.lpi.usra.edu...
Compared with one from retiredafb.
After hours spent on the job (efficent zooming was VERY difficult) i can say for sure that the ship's area is blurried and underdetailed: don't know
why but it is.
Still - they both look like the SAME object, don't you think???
Jombo999
[edit on 9-5-2007 by mystr]
[edit on 9-5-2007 by mystr]
The top image has the look of a U-boat or other submarine hull lying on the floor of the ocean. The craters are all that make it look like its on the
moon.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 03:47 PM by jimbo999
|
Hmmm...weird. It DOES look as though someone is PURPOSELY trying to hide the detail from that crater at NASA - now, I wonder WHY they would do that?
Jimbo999
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 03:55 PM by jimbo999
|
Originally posted by greatlakes
I would think it would be difficult and time consuming (but not impossible) to add detail and resolution to existing video and images. The detail is
not only on the ship, but everywhere, the surface and craters itself...
But he may have simply taken high resolution photos that exist from NASA, printed them, lighted them properly, then panned a camera over the photos
with a window pain in front of the lens. This would be much easier and quicker
Well, the guy who actually posed the video claims to live in France actually. A pretty sophisticated country - as I'm sure you'd notice should you
ever visit it (highly recommended).
As for facillities to launch a lunar rocket? Ever hear of Groom Lake? It's an entire city of aviation specialists - FAR more sophisticated and larger
than anything NASA has at CC Florida. So, that's no mystery really - if they wanted to launch a 'secret' moon shot - that would be the place to do
it from I figure...
Jimbo999
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-6-2007 @ 05:42 PM by cometa
|
As for facillities to launch a lunar rocket? Ever hear of Groom Lake? It's an entire city of aviation specialists - FAR more sophisticated and larger
than anything NASA has at CC Florida. So, that's no mystery really - if they wanted to launch a 'secret' moon shot - that would be the place to do
it from I figure...
thats what i say, mate.
the military-industrial-complex doesnt need something like "nasa" to get something into space, dont you think? they can do whatever
they want!
[edit on 10/6/07 by cometa]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 12-6-2007 @ 12:37 PM by jimbo999
|
Originally posted by cometa
As for facillities to launch a lunar rocket? Ever hear of Groom Lake? It's an entire city of aviation specialists - FAR more sophisticated and larger
than anything NASA has at CC Florida. So, that's no mystery really - if they wanted to launch a 'secret' moon shot - that would be the place to do
it from I figure...
thats what i say, mate.
the military-industrial-complex doesnt need something like "nasa" to get something into space, dont you think? they can do whatever
they want!
[edit on 10/6/07 by cometa]
Exactly...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2007 @ 03:43 PM by Bspiracy
|
Regarding the fact he has a "higher res image"
I sent a message to retiredafb and he responded with
"the preflight stydy, is a video realized by filming stills, two panoramic shots, the final shot is a anaglyphic still combining the red and blue
component of as15 9625 and 9630."
B
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-6-2007 @ 05:17 PM by curiousbeliever
|
Regarding the interview with retiredafb posted earlier:
www.ufodigest.com...
It appears that there are some missing quesitons on that page.
But I think I found a more complete interview here:
www.angelismarriti.it...
One question I found interesting:
6) L.S. When and above all why did you decide to disclose these information about classified space missions and is there anybody who is protecting
you?
W.R. It's the announcement of "the wonder of it all" maybe, and 2012 is coming fast. I also think that UFOs will appear more often starting from
September 2007. A lot of people died around me in Rwanda, and I have more time to take care of this. About protection, please understand it's hard to
speak of my armoury.
[edit on 14-6-2007 by curiousbeliever]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 02:10 PM by Cygnific
|
Guess we can close it as hoax. Thanks to lunarexplorer.it and Ufologica for providing the original uncompressed full image of AS_15-P-9625-05. Here is
the rock cut and pasted.
Edit: Would be nice to know how it was done though, the crater overflight seems original Apollo material to me.
[edit on 18/6/2007 by Cygnific]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 05:56 PM by Quasar
|
Where did they get that picture? It says, "Copyright Nasa/Lunar and Planetary Institute," but that just leads you back to lpi.usra.edu. I would
like to see the original of that image. I still can't personally put this in my hoax basket, its interesting. How it came about, this mysterious
retiredafb guy, the whole Apollo 20 thing, Buzz Aldren's latest remarks on Fox, Armstrong still keeping his mouth shut, why visiting the moon came to
an abrupt halt, etc. It wouldn't surprise me if this turns out to be a lie as
well.
I got intrigued to do an AB test on this. First is a cut and zoom of
AS15-P-9630. (Which is what the above picture actually is from)
This second is the new picture, shrunk to size.
And those two (closely) AB'd.
That new picture is pretty cool looking, but I'm still not sure what it proves. If this thing has been sitting there for "Billions" of years, why
wouldn't it look like that. Maybe our moon was a stepping stone to get to Earth from Nirubu or something.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:02 PM by Cydonian Priest
|
You are not telling me you all actually believe this video.....
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:05 PM by Quasar
|
Not the video, no. But this still doesn't look natural.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:07 PM by Cydonian Priest
|
Thank you so much or saying that. This video has been discussed long before this. If you want "unatural" formations, go to the space exploration
forum and look at the Mars anomaly threads, jesus they are amazing!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:34 PM by Cygnific
|
Originally posted by Quasar
Where did they get that picture? It says, "Copyright Nasa/Lunar and Planetary Institute,"
You have to order the full high resoluation at the Lunar and Planetary Institute if you want to be really sure it is not a fake.
Or go to this website and the last 2 pictures are a portion of the full high
resolution image showing the 'thing'
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-6-2007 @ 06:43 PM by Lexion
|
Originally posted by jimbo999
As for facillities to launch a lunar rocket? Ever hear of Groom Lake?
I have. And I've actually sat atop Tikaboo and looked at it.
FAR more sophisticated and larger than anything NASA has at CC Florida.
Because they are an R&D base. Not a launch facility.
So, that's no mystery really - if they wanted to launch a 'secret' moon shot - that would be the place to do it from I figure...
Jim, I really hope you're not being serious ?
Have you even SEEN the Groom facility ? Or satelite photos of it ?
Do you know how large a launch structure is ?
Groom doesn't have a launch structure.
Seriously, look at the ideas you propose, before you propose them.
Regards,
Lex
|
copyright & usage
|
 |