Thanks GL

It took hours, ugh! I type the candidates name in and then a phrase like either just "council on foreign relations", or "council
trilateral skull bilderberg". Invariable you start to see the same sites coming up time and again. I found 2 sites on the CFR's page where they
rated every candidate on Iraq and on free trade, or rather, their banker driven WTO spewin managed trade that they try to tell us is "free" but
isn't. The biggest obstacle is only getting 4000 characters. I might come back and do another write up on just those 2 issues for every candidate.
Many more sources came up, like these:
www.bilderberg.org...
www.theforbiddenknowledge.com...
www.geocities.com...
www.apfn.org...
www.cfr.org...
stage.cfr.org...
I can't stress it enough. If you currently hold pre-concieved ideas regarding your candidate of choice, and you appear to be locked in to supporting
that candidate and are otherwise obstinate to looking at the policies of other candidates, please step outside of yourself for a moment, and
objectively look at them again through the lens of whether or not they are an internationalist, globalist, WTO managed free trade (very important that
you understand that NAFTA/CAFTA/FTAA/GATT/SPPI is NOT "free trade"), or pro-UN/NAU/NWO.
Do not take "party" into consideration. Just because someone is a Republican doesn't mean they are a pro-Bush, pro-war neo-con. Note: Clinton's
and Bush's are on the "same team". Literally, throw out the old paradigm of red state vs blue state, liberal vs. conservative, rep vs. dem, pro
life vs. pro choice (this issue could be solved by letting the states decide), but do take "Constitutional" issues into consideration, things that
end our sovereignty, or give authority over our domain to the UN, or things that remove the ability of the people to retake their government should it
resort to authoritarian rule (the true reason behind the 2nd amendment).
All that "Left vs. Right" garbage is known as "Marxist Hegelian Dialectic Techniques". These are techniques the elitists use against us to 1)
keep our attention fixated on American Idol and against each other and away from the global elitists plans to subvert our Constitution and merge us
into the NAU, and 2) it divides us, keeping us fighting each other over stupid crap until it's too late. The old "Divide and Conquer."
If your candidate falls into any of the above categories, then you should not support that candidate, because that candidate does not "support,
protect, and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic" as the oath of office implies. The continued sovereignty of the
United States of America is what is at stake in this next election. I am going to join the Republican Party and vote for Ron Paul in the Primary.
This is critical if your goal is to see that he wins the nomination. If he doesn't win the Republican nomination, then I will leave the party and
probably join the Constitution Party and hope he runs as an Independent, Constitutionalist, or Libertarian.
Lastly, I highly recommend that whatever candidate you choose, that you actively work to make electronic voting illegal in your state, or at least
work to have it backed up by a paper record. All 50 states must do this to secure the integrity of our electoral process.
Whatever you choose, I hope you found this information informative and helpful folks. I love this country very much, and I am fighting hard to spread
the freedom message while respecting others views. Just know that we are in the top of the 9th inning and if we do not act soon and make this coming
vote count, we will all lose, and America will fall just like Rome did. That's what empires do.
God Bless and Good Luck
[edit on 5/27/07 by Kelldor]