Another thing to think about....
As it was'nt just Madeleine in the apartment but her baby siblings too, why would a child abducter not take the babies too?
If it's someone snatching a kid for a ransom, despite the fact that we probably would have had demands by now, surely 3 kids would have been better
than one? Maybe it's more hassle looking after 2 babies than a 3 year old, and it would be harder to conceal all 3, but nethertheless.
If it's some sick paedophile abduction for a sex ring, i just can't see why they left the babies? To the sick minds of these people, a baby is no
different that an older child.
Back in the early 90's in Germany, i had the sickening experience of not only arresting the guy, but being present at a police interview where a
child abducter who had strangled his victims explained his actions to the police.
He talked about it as though it was a day trip to the shops, very normal and something he would do again and again given the chance.
One thing astounded me, he said he chose his victims, who were only a few years old, because he "could'nt find anything younger".
Thats the kind of mindset we are dealing with here when people take kids.
Whilst it's great putting out appeals and everything else, theres little hope that it will bother the abducter. They won't feel the sorrow that we
feel for the child because they are so young, thier youth is the reason they were taken in the first place. Sick i know, but thats just the facts.
Lots of things in this case just don't add up, but there is so much guessing and speculation that i suppose it will seem like that at times.