Originally posted by shai hulud
My friend, secession from the United States under Constitutional statewide legislative vote is not illegal because it does not mention the subject at
all.
The Civil War was about the survival of the nation. If states had been left with the right to seceed from the Union, then it would only be a matter of
time before it collapsed into seperate countries. I agree there were serious financial considerations as well, but ultimately the reason we had a
civil war is because the Confederacy felt states should have the right to seceed and the Union felt that this would destroy America. The Union won,
and ever since then we've stayed one nation. States may be allowed to split in to multiple states, cities may be allowed to be removed from state
control, but no state or city is allowed to leave the federal union.
Originally posted by shai hulud
Supreme Court decisions made by criminals in robes that have touched on the subject are so far removed from the original concept that if the Union is
unjust, a people (i.e. State) have the right to leave. Having no choice but to stay in a tyrannical Union is not what the founding fathers wanted.
Indeed. That is why they gave us the right to bear arms. They knew then, as our own commanders know now, that if an entire nation revolts in arms, its
own army cannot stand against it. But our union is hardly tyrannical. We may be fat, lazy, inconsiderate, rude, and extremely wasteful, but
tyrannical? Hardly. I heartily recommend you examine North Korea if you want an example of tyranny. That's a scary place.
Now, I consider Bush Administration to be tyrants, but they are merely our Executive Branch, and they are due to be replaced in just under two years.
As long as elections are held, and there is no reason to suspect they won't be, I have no intention of revolting, because the elections are what have
allowed us to progress as a nation, for better or worse, for over 200 years, to become the most powerful nation on Earth... at least until China or
India catches up and surpasses us.
Originally posted by shai hulud
If we were to get 100% of the population to vote, but it was for the Antichrist, does it make it right just for the sake of voting?
Yes, in point of fact, it does. If 100% of the nation voted, and the majority of them voted the most dispicable person you can think of into office,
then you must admit that the majority of the nation
wants it to be that way, and thus, they will not rise up in revolt. The same nation may,
four years later, replace this person as being too incompetant or loathesome to stand, or they may give them another four years.
The only time this really comes into question is when the vote is so narrow, and there is such a great degree of scandal among the voting machines,
that people can no longer trust the accuracy or authenticity of their vote. In that instance, revolution is around the corner, be it from the people,
or the tyrants. However, I think that we have not yet reached this point. We've touched it, briefly, but not actually sunk to it.
If the actions of the majority of voters truly offend you, try getting involved in politics first, and if it fails, then try being an expatriot
second. Me, I'm going into politics out of sheer disgust.