It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Insolubrious
What do you folks make of this?
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by Insolubrious
What do you folks make of this?
Shadow of a neighboring building.
Originally posted by Insolubrious
Originally posted by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by Insolubrious
What do you folks make of this?
Shadow of a neighboring building.
ha, is that a joke? If you are serious I am referring to the first picture, that can't be a shadow from another building.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
It's a composite image made from two pictures pasted together. The "gash" is just the front of the building appearing again. I don't know why they would do that, but it seems obvious that's what they did.
Originally posted by Insolubrious
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
It's a composite image made from two pictures pasted together. The "gash" is just the front of the building appearing again. I don't know why they would do that, but it seems obvious that's what they did.
No the image is not pasted together its a single frame taken from a live broadcast, I will find the clip..
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Ok, I'll bite. Why does it say "composite image" at the top of the photo then?
Originally posted by eagle32I dont see no gash
An image not in the reports (Fig. 4) shows mild facade damage to the upper floors, as described in NIST's appraisal. Since the building collapsed from the bottom, this damage can be considered unimportant for determining possible trigger events for the collapse.
Originally posted by amfirst
All the debunking you need for WTC7 can be found on this site. www.debunking911.com...