Originally posted by DogHead
This is a forum. Point and counterpoint is how it works. Consider me the counterpoint for the Learish goblinism.
Hegel would be so proud.
Calling bulls__t isn't trolling, it's just calling bulls__t.
You can call it what you want. I am cool with that.
But you are not distinguishing the difference between calling him on his BS, and crossing the line into obnoxiousness.
You are not calling his theories into question so much as his character. While one may indicate the other, i would not say it is true often enough to
warrant that as a general rule (consider one of thousands of "heretics" that laid the foundation for our current understanding).
I read your link in the other thread. Interesting read. It would seem to support the concept that the UFOlogy field is a dog eat dog world. If it
were true in its' entirety, the only thing that changes is that i would be more leary of meeting John at his home. Since it is still unfounded (i am
not calling you or your friend a liar, but stating that the whole story is as much heresay as Johns rebuttal) i can only be mostly indifferent about
I suspect that, until you get legal recourse or some level of proof beyond the anecdotal, not many people are going to fall in line with your
And the fact that you are restating it over and over again as justification to disbelieve what John (and Zorgon, too...although they are indeed two
separate people) posts and to level personal attacks on it.
I love your avatar. That was a really good movie. I love some of the hidden messages it contained.
[edit on 29-1-2008 by bigfatfurrytexan]