Question about cars, I want an answer. No more messing around., page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 28-4-2007 @ 11:26 PM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss


Those are all some very interesting images I must say.

Why isn't that minivan burning up like the others?, if this is all leading to where I think it is...


reply posted on 29-4-2007 @ 09:47 AM by ThichHeaded
Here are a few more images to help with progress of this post.







This image above.. WTC Complex is bottom left across the street where the box thing is on the street.

This is as good as as all images ever seen on 9/11 with cars.. If there are any others.. I would like to see them.


reply posted on 29-4-2007 @ 10:06 AM by ThichHeaded
I am going to steal some points from Sauron's post here and add it to here.

I am going to do highlights of his post since i am lazy and not going to read the whole thing.

===================
===========
Below is nothing from me, all from the post above.. I would quote all of the posts but that would look crappy so I am just going to paste it.
===========
===================

1. Why is the wire mesh fencing behind the cars not effected? The doors on the patrol car are clearly melted, yet the wire fence still has a lot of tension on it?

2. Why is the bridges frame structures paint clearly unaffected by the inferno? If you look closely the paint is still clearly gray. I see no smoke stain, discoloring, darkening

3. Why is there no ash under where the vehicles are parked. In fact the roads surface is clearly unaffected. If the fire was to melt the car doors, tiers, bonnets surely a tar rock surface would melt

-------------------------

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

www.abovetopsecret.com...
here is a part from this post here

► Paul Curran Fire Patrolman (F.D.N.Y.) 12/18/01
"At that time I went back to the north tower again, and they were stretching a line. A lot of car fires erupted. All of a sudden cars were blowing up everywhere.

I ran into the lobby cause I had no idea what had happened and the cops that were in there were telling everybody get out, get out, get out. Where are you gonna go? Stuff's blowing up.

As I was running up Vesey, the first car blew up on me on the corner of Vessey and the West Side Highway. That set my turnout coat on fire, that set my hair on fire, and that set my feet on fire. I kept running. I got news for you, those turn out coats need to be called burn out coats, cause this thing caught up in flames.

So there were still cars parked on the street that were completely independent of that. Three cars blew up on me, stuff was being thrown. I went home all bruised that day. Thank God it was only bruises. I just ran into this park along with a bunch of other people, and stuff was still blowing up...

Stuff is still blowing up behind me, as I'm running. I can hear stuff exploding. I could hear rumbling, the street under me was moving like I was in an earthquake.

► Ronald Coyne E.M.T. (E.M.S.) 12/28/01
"...I saw the building start to topple...I tried to run as fast as I could...and by the time it took me to break the back window of the SUV, my safety coat was already on fire. My socks were on fire.

I was just covered with burns and bruises, and I couldn't breathe at all."

----------------------------

There is more in that post.. But this can get us to further thinking.

I think its something we don't want to admit to because we don't wanna be considered top whackjob.. But selfless has been half ass hinting to it since this post start.. And I know at least 1 other in this post definitely agrees with selfless and myself.. Apparently we don't have the balls to actually come out and say what it is...

But lets see if we can come up with a normal reason 1st before re resort to the one some of us are thinking.


reply posted on 29-4-2007 @ 05:58 PM by selfless
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
Exactly - cars aren't the exception to the laws of combustion.

Either debris fell on them, or they were torched. If nukes were used, they wouldn't selectively burn cars.


But if you look at the photograph above, you can see that the cars that were torched have no debris on them... by the time it would have taken to remove all the debris that could have caused these cars to set on fire, they would have also moved the cars from that area so you wouldn't even be seeing cars in the photo.


And also, keep in mind that the debris had to of been from when the planes hit the towers and not when it fell down or else for debris to make it that far ''2 blocks away'' there would be no cars to look at, it would be meters high of building debris just like the surrounding area of the block the world trade center buildings were.

And if that were the case 2 blocks away, the whole block it self would have been pretty much destroyed and there would be no survivors in that area and well there were many on that day who survived 2 blocks away.

And when you see the buildings coming down you see people get swept by the smoke a few blocks away from the world trade center buildings and yet they did not burn and they did not receive any debris onto them so how can you explain magical debris that only magically made it's way to certain cars?



[edit on 29-4-2007 by selfless]

Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 14 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 7 days ago with 13 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 18 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags