9-11 ignorance

SELFLESS
so wat ur saying that the person who goes on an animal loving forum and talks about hunting doesnt love animals???
so ur saying people that hunt hate animals?

then wat is it considered in this forum? the truth or a conspiracy?

Thank you Amfirst for addressing some of my Qs:


Te guys in the harbor certainly did not. And that's the only way the "first overt act" could happen. We are on two different levels here I'm sensing. I fell Pearl Harbor as a parallel works AGAINST the officil story. I hope you at least have an inkling of what I mean - look into it "Day of Deceit" by Robert Stinnett and you'll see where I'm coming from.


They better. You can only do something like that once without a scandal. So do it big!


That's the story we've heard. Problem is, the reason planes into buildings had never happened is becasue in every other attempt it was prevented. Hmmm...


True, it's never happened yet, so I guess if anyone tries at all it'll happen. That's scary.



Nope. Nukes have never been warned of too much, it's usually a more available radiological bomb, which it's been shown would kill no one unless they panic and stampede. So what does the gov and media do? Show a mushroom cloud when talking about a dirty bomb and amphasize its "danger," without mentioning don't panic. Curious.


Again, dismal outlook. They should hire people to imagine and prepare for scenarios. Every time they do tho, the scenario seems to come true...

[edit on 26-4-2007 by Caustic Logic]

Wow... you present such well thought out arguments I don't know where to start.

Maybe if I could read your personal made up language, I could respond with logic... Instead I will call you out for insulting others and coming off as arrogant and hard headed.

A person who hunts and says he loves animals is a hypocrite.

so does that make a person who eats meat a hypocrite if they say they love animals?

Ok grasshopper I want to know the truth about 9-11. I'll pass my theories along. So are you in or out?

The point i was trying to make is a conflict of interests.

Here is another example: A person who would go on a forum that discusses hockey would go there for the purpose of talking about baseball.

Do you see what I'm saying? motivation and intention is the key for purpose, your purpose on this board is not compatible with the intention of the boards purpose.

Conflict of interest.



[edit on 26-4-2007 by selfless]

That's my personal view, i am not gonna accuse anyone who eats animal of being wrong, to each his own about our perception frequency.

But to kill an animal and say you love animals is like having children and abuse them and at the same time say you love them... conflict of interest.

ok ur calling out who? me? because attacking me instead of the arguement wont prove anything

I can't read what you are writing.

nice anology. haha
really so i suppose u think hunting and abuse are the same?
hunting isnt abuse its just shooting an animal for fun. hey i can hunt deer but love animals like dogs and cats.

ok im sorry ur illiterate. u called me out didnt u?
then go for it? wats stopping u besides being too dumb to read?

In order for you to not be an hypocrite and hunt deers would be to say you love cats and dogs but not say you love animals because animals means all the animals that exists.

Better be specific to leave out the animals you like to slaughter when you say you love animals, wouldn't you say?





[edit on 26-4-2007 by selfless]

Ok time out. Now kids play nice.

Logicaltruth14 your speaking in IM.

well we're not talking about hunting in an animal loving forum so why wprry?

It was merely an example of Conflict Of Interests related to forum interests and why do you go on a forum that has a purpose that does not fit your own?

I stay out of the religious forums for that reason in order to avoid conflict, better to just stay out of there completely if i don't agree with it, get it?

i get u but ur point of view has to be challenged. wat i dont mind conflict. this forum talks about 911 conspiracies alright since u all think the govt did it u accept that as the truth therefore wat i say is a conspiracy to u.
get me?

No because what you believe is the official story and a conspiracy is infinite possibilities of what could have happened BESIDES the official story told by the government.

Conspiracy is a word with a meaning in this reality, it has to have a meaning to what it's related to.

You can't say a dog is a cat and a cat is a dog can you? You could if you were born in a reality where it was invented so.

cats have fur
dogs have fur
therefore cats are dogs.

just proved it to u