It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

WTC architect claims towers were designed for controlled demolition

page: 2
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 25 2010 @ 03:07 PM
link   
reply to post by hooper
 


Laffloley was NOT a registered architect. He says that he was employed as a designer of certain floors in the South Tower. The line dividing what we call an architect and what we called a designer can be a thin one.......

Anyway, the point is academic. If you are trying to insinuate that Laffoley was lying in claiming to have helped design the South Tower, then you don't make sense. Why would someone who believes in the official story that hijackers helped to cause the collapse of the two towers lie about their being pre-rigged for controlled demolition? Not being a "conspiracy theorist", ""9/11 truther," crazy (take your pick), he has no motive to lie. His explosive statement was made in a throw-away remark whose implications he did not seem to realize. He naively thought that the fires caused by the planes' impacts somehow triggered the demolition charges. It is that aspect of his statement that adds great credibility to his claim that the towers were pre-wired for controlled demolition.

[edit on 25-6-2010 by micpsi]



posted on Jun, 25 2010 @ 04:01 PM
link   
reply to post by micpsi
 


I do stand corrected. He does appear to have been a part of the design team in the very early stages, for a brief period of time. However, that does not lend any credibilty to the ridiculous notion of "pre-wiring" a building for demolition. This is stupid on some many levels its hard to even know where to begin.

First, lets pretend that the notion was intended as simply a "precaution" and had no nefarious underpinnings. The "pre-wiring" is useless because no, and I repeat no blaster is going to trust "wires" (assuming of course that they would even consider electrical conduction) that he/she did not install themselves, let alone wires that have been sitting around uninspected for 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 years.



posted on Jun, 27 2010 @ 02:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by hooper
First, lets pretend that the notion was intended as simply a "precaution" and had no nefarious underpinnings. The "pre-wiring" is useless because no, and I repeat no blaster is going to trust "wires" (assuming of course that they would even consider electrical conduction) that he/she did not install themselves, let alone wires that have been sitting around uninspected for 10, 20, 30, 40 or 50 years.


Not to mention, there's no way any such wiring could ever have been kept secret to begin with. There were other workmen doing other things to get the towers built, after all.

In the scale of implausibility this claim is a few places below "nukes in the basement".



 
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join