Phew that was a big read now I believe in the creator. I believe in the bible.
But firstly. Omnipotent, God is Omnipotent, the people who have come before me have argued how can you place an omnipotent in human science and logic.
This is a very valid point.
... I agree, a can follow with your reasoning and logic and it rarely fails in that text.
However MY MAIN POINT IS: you (or who ever has written this) have made many assumptions to start with (I shall go through and argue them later).
Because of these assumptions you have failed disproove anything.
One of these is the omnipotent God. All this nothing and something. All this relys on science saying "this is happened therefore i predict this will
happen next time" it relies on 1's and 0's, yes/ no, You have already made this God finite,
This God is Infinite. After all how did the
earth/universe (something) appear from nothing in your logic?
Also does this logic explain what is out side of this universe? and what is out side of that and what is outside of that ... etc. In this way our,
Logic and science and our understanding relies on this you have a point it travels at a velocity for an amount of time. You have your distance. Making
things finite again. For an Infinite God. And you made this clear in the first paragraph.
Oh well, yeah in the next paragraphs i dont believe in aliens, and you are presuming aliens exist and also you seem to assume that some form of
evolution takes place. (which i dont have a problem with until you define it).
Originally posted by lilblam
To say that before anything existed, a God existed, is an oxymoron. Such a statement can neither be understood nor conceived by our minds.
Yeah actually the bible doesnt make sense alot of the bible is apparent oxymorons and paradox's. The very reason why we are saved ..... Because Jesus
was fully man, and fully God. ... I personally dont argue that sorta thing with God as my mind is far too ... weak to understand God. I fear a God who
i dont understand and that is a reason to fear him.Strike two says, since there was something which must have predated a God,
Thoms law
Actually though i dont really argue much with the logic of "Thoms Law". The fact that ... if there was nothing to begin with there will be nothing
now ... the fact that there is something now means that there was something then ... and that was God to say that there was nothing then, then, would
be to say there isnt really anything now would there. Thats my oxymoron for you, though im in very thin ground as ive never studied thoms law. If you
agree with this and thoms law you would be assuming that ther was nothing to begin with.
Originally posted by lilblam
So even a God (which is something) could not be produced by nothing. Therefore, if a God came into being, he must have come out of something. The only
"something" which exists now and has always existed is that of energy and/or matter.
You are assuming God was produced here.
And agian with the last paragraph of "strike one" you are assuming what i argued first.
Originally posted by lilblam
Strike two says, since there was something which must have predated a God,
Bad start i have already disagreed with your "logic" behind that.
From Now on i can only really pick at what you say as you have created a false logic behind all your reasoning.
So first.
Originally posted by lilblam
Knowledge and character MUST be developed. It can not be decreed. It can not be magically waved into existence. Knowledge and character is a PRODUCT
of life and living. It is a product of making wise and foolish choices. It is a product of growth.
You assume: Knowlege and character MUST be developed. To right Knowlege is gained from information. Thats what ive been taught. But what If God
already contains all the information. He is an Infinite God.
Or if God was there first then there was no information there to feed his knowledge. Therefore he would of gained all the knowledge possible.
Mid arguement point here sorry: An Infinite God im saying, How can you argue with infinity?
"it is a product of making wise and foolish choices"
...Trial and error ... Science ... making a prediction from what you know before hand. Just pointing out the depth you are taking Science into.
Yes, I dont believe he sneezed after all he did say let there be ... what ever.
"Character must be developed by finding out what is good and what works"
Sorry but again what people have said earlier you trying to push God into a finite box.
Originally posted by lilblam
That is, the Christians give God a good, moral and powerful character.
Moral? Since when is God moral. God doesnt appear to be moral ... He comands genocide in judges ... he finds Gay acts detestable ... he gives us no
rights
God is love but he isnt Moral
Originally posted by lilblam
Therefore, there must have been other individuals and intelligences with whom God could interact in order to develop a good character. There must be
at least a family of them.
We believe in the trinity! Yes, I wouldnt say they are a family Because they are all exactly the same, God.
Why cant God talk to himself or other members of the trinity. I talk to him but he already knows what im going to say.
Strike 3
I have never heard of this mistranslation. Though if it is true and not a misinterpretation itself. As hebrew was recorded in only constanants and
could easily misinterpreted. Even if what you are saying is true it could of ment Gods could be refering to the trinity.
The problem also is that made and create could be the same word in hebrew. After all even words in the King James have different meanings now.
And now you start refering to the Gods of New and Old testiment as seperate where most Christians consider them the same. Exactly the same. The same
God, Creator God.
As for the rest I know they have created other Gods so..... They had a strong difference of being human dependant. And required Human efforts to gain
salvation or to keep them happy. Of course Christianity relies on Gods Grace.
Also God gave us a desire to search for a God so that we may find him.
And again you repeat the same logic as before 0's wow and all im saying is that things didnt start with a 0 as science would sudjest despite thoms
theory but 1.
I believe in God the creator so i wont be bothered fighting for people who believe God the maker.
I shall finish there. Please bear in mind everytime i said you i ment the writer of this text you have quoted.
[Edited on 4-4-2004 by Beanie_pianoforte]