Not quite sure what to make of this 'logic'.
Is it an example of 'tit for tat' and 'two wrongs make a right' type philosophy?
Originally posted by ANOK
You need to read some history of the Christians. They have been and are still a far bigger threat to civilisation than any other religion has ever
been.
Christians dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, but I guess you could find a way to justify that?
The atomic bombs were not dropped on Japanese to demonstrate 'religious' differences. There was a world-war in progress.
Christians have killed doctors over womens choices, but I guess you could find a way to justify that?
In the above instances, those who killed the doctors believed they were saving the lives of unborn children. It was still murder, but it was NOT an
example of 'those of one religion murdering people of another religion, based on religious differences' -----
was it?
But anyway we would probably agree that those people are not real Christians, and we shouldn't blame Christianity?
So why do people keep blaming Islam!?
People 'blame islam' when muslims murder people of other religions based on religious differences' .
If muslims DON'T want people to 'blame them' for murdering people ----- then they'd better STOP murdering people ! Simple.
Guns don't kill people, people do. Religions don't kill people, people do.
You seem determined to evade the issue with your greeting-card sentiments.
So let's return to the issue that has you so confused and indignant:
WHY did the Turkish muslims slit the Christian's throats?
Is there a world-war occurring in Turkey?
Were the Christians at the Bible publishers in the act of killing abortionists?
No.
The Turkish muslims murdered the Christians at the book publishers
because they were Christian.
Murder. Murder using 'religion' as justification.
You state:
Religions don't kill people, people do
Really?
In this instance, it was muslims who murdered Christians
because they were Christians. Not because they were wearing tartan or eating pizza.
No, the muslims killed the Christians because they were Christian.
No fancy dancing involving world-wars and anti-abortionists can change that fact.
It was barbaric and backwards. It was arrogant and ignorant. It was putrid ----
as is ANYone who attempts to minimise the crime or defend the
criminals.
You say 'religions don't kill people' ?
Would the murderers have killed the Christians if those murderers had NOT been muslims?
Or, put another way ---- would those Turk muslims have murdered the people at the book publishers if those people had NOT been Christian?
So 'religion' DOES kill people ---- particularly when a religion exhorts its followers to 'kill the infidel'.
You have attempted to EXCUSE murder, using twisted and nonsensical logic.
Why?
What do you know of Christianity or ANY religion, apart from what your unschooled religious leaders have told you?
Do you find Christianity exhorting
its followers --- now, in the 21st century --- to KILL those of other religions?
Show me where, please.
in this case from now on any murder that is commited by a christain and so forth it shall be the fault of all the people that follow that
faith? 
