This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


Investigators probe Eurofighter crash mystery




Topic started on 25-11-2002 @ 06:57 AM by UniQue Werkx


www.newscientist.com...

"Investigators are studying data transmitted from a prototype Eurofighter Typhoon jet shortly before it crashed during a test flight on Thursday. The plane's two-person crew ejected seconds before the plane crashed into a mountainous region of Toledo in central Spain at 1215 GMT."



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-11-2002 @ 08:06 PM by f16falcon


so much for being the best fighter in the world



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 01:18 PM by Subatomic


?

[edit on 21-4-2006 by Subatomic]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 01:49 PM by echoblade


Not wanting to start a "my fighter is best" contest, but I fail to see how the Typhoon is more "operational" than the Raptor.

edit didn't see the first post date, why did you unearth this old one ?

[edit on 21//4//06 by echoblade]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 02:15 PM by waynos


I didn't notice either echoblade, I was thinking "bloody hell, another one?"



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 04:43 PM by Subatomic


oops

Ill stop replying to old threads & read the posting dates from now on.

I like to read old threads as well as the new ones & thought this one deserved an explanation. I understand some Typhoons have now entered squadron service & therefore can be deployed immediately (I maybe wrong).

I am quite new to posting here & not so good at thread etiquette yet.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 05:28 PM by waynos


I done the same thing in the past, read an extremely old thread without realising and thinking the poster was a muppet, when in fact the muppet was me

Incidenatally, the operational status of the Raptor and the RAF Typhoon are about the same, with a single front line squadron plus training/conversion units. Unless I am mistaken about the Raptor.

[edit on 21-4-2006 by waynos]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 06:07 PM by Subatomic


Well thank you for the support waynos. -From ATS's newest muppet (who just learnt a valuable lesson). A few questions though -If I keep replying to this thread will it ever go away & will i ever live it down or will it be "oh no not that muppet again"

I was not aware that the raptor was operational -once again i bow to your superior knowledge.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 10:14 PM by WestPoint23



Incidenatally, the operational status of the Raptor and the RAF Typhoon are about the same, with a single front line squadron plus training/conversion units. Unless I am mistaken about the Raptor.


Your right of course, the 27th FS is the currently the only fully converted front line squadron using the Raptor and the 94th FS is converting to the F-22 although its not quite there yet. However there are several bases using the Raptor for various reasons.



In addition to the active air force, pilots with the 192nd Virginia Air National Guard in Richmond are also flying F-22 Raptors. The F-22 Raptor is currently flying at three other bases across the United States: • Testing is conducted at Edwards AFB, Calif. • Tactics development is ongoing at Nellis AFB, Nev. • A full squadron of Raptors is based at Tyndall AFB, Fla., for pilot and maintainer training.

Link



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 04:05 AM by waynos


Thanks Westy Thatds what I thought but couldn't be sure.

By comparison, although the RAF has re-equipped Nos 3,17 and 29 Sqn, only 3 Sqn is a front line operational unit, 17 and 29 are training/conversion units. The next squadron due to convert is the former Tornado F.3 operating 11 Sqn, who were one of the last two Lightning squadrons in the RAF back in 1988. After them 6 Sqn 'the flying can openers', now disposing of their Jaguar GR.3's, will be the next.

The only reason that the training units carry Squadron numberplates is because of the UK's massive defence cuts and the traditionalists in the RAF are trying to keep these historic identities alive. Otherwise they would be called something like '229OCU' or similar.

[edit on 22-4-2006 by waynos]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 05:53 AM by Jezza



Originally posted by Subatomic
Well thank you for the support waynos. -From ATS's newest muppet (who just learnt a valuable lesson). A few questions though -If I keep replying to this thread will it ever go away & will i ever live it down or will it be "oh no not that muppet again"

I was not aware that the raptor was operational -once again i bow to your superior knowledge.



Welcome to the funny farm Subatomic


WE ALL MAKE MISTAKES Subatomic



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 06:19 AM by echoblade


Yep subatomic, don't worry, no harm done nor intended, anyway since you're brit you're excused, I mean, it's not really your fault... errr... just joking, really
cheers



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:






ATS MIX Podcasts:


Recently Added Videos







Newest Topics:





















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , , , , , , , ,


















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.097 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread