 |
|
Topic started on 25-11-2002 @ 06:57 AM by UniQue Werkx
|
www.newscientist.com...
"Investigators are studying data transmitted from a prototype Eurofighter Typhoon jet shortly before it crashed during a test flight on Thursday. The
plane's two-person crew ejected seconds before the plane crashed into a mountainous region of Toledo in central Spain at 1215 GMT."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-11-2002 @ 08:06 PM by f16falcon
|
so much for being the best fighter in the world
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 01:18 PM by Subatomic
|
?
[edit on 21-4-2006 by Subatomic]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 01:49 PM by echoblade
|
Not wanting to start a "my fighter is best" contest, but I fail to see how the Typhoon is more "operational" than the Raptor.
edit didn't see the first post date, why did you unearth this old one ?
[edit on 21//4//06 by echoblade]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 02:15 PM by waynos
|
I didn't notice either echoblade, I was thinking "bloody hell, another one?"
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 04:43 PM by Subatomic
|
oops
Ill stop replying to old threads & read the posting dates from now on.
I like to read old threads as well as the new ones & thought this one deserved an explanation. I understand some Typhoons have now entered squadron
service & therefore can be deployed immediately (I maybe wrong).
I am quite new to posting here & not so good at thread etiquette yet.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 05:28 PM by waynos
|
I done the same thing in the past, read an extremely old thread without realising and thinking the poster was a muppet, when in fact the muppet was me
Incidenatally, the operational status of the Raptor and the RAF Typhoon are about the same, with a single front line squadron plus training/conversion
units. Unless I am mistaken about the Raptor.
[edit on 21-4-2006 by waynos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 06:07 PM by Subatomic
|
Well thank you for the support waynos. -From ATS's newest muppet (who just learnt a valuable lesson). A few questions though -If I keep replying to
this thread will it ever go away & will i ever live it down or will it be "oh no not that muppet again"
I was not aware that the raptor was operational -once again i bow to your superior knowledge.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-4-2006 @ 10:14 PM by WestPoint23
|
 Incidenatally, the operational status of the Raptor and the RAF Typhoon are about the same, with a single front line squadron plus
training/conversion units. Unless I am mistaken about the Raptor. 
Your right of course, the 27th FS is the currently the only fully converted front line squadron using the Raptor and the 94th FS is converting to the
F-22 although its not quite there yet. However there are several bases using the Raptor for various reasons.
In addition to the active air force, pilots with the 192nd Virginia Air National Guard in Richmond are also flying F-22 Raptors. The F-22 Raptor is
currently flying at three other bases across the United States: • Testing is conducted at Edwards AFB, Calif. • Tactics development is ongoing at
Nellis AFB, Nev. • A full squadron of Raptors is based at Tyndall AFB, Fla., for pilot and maintainer training.
Link
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 04:05 AM by waynos
|
Thanks Westy  Thatds what I thought but couldn't be sure.
By comparison, although the RAF has re-equipped Nos 3,17 and 29 Sqn, only 3 Sqn is a front line operational unit, 17 and 29 are training/conversion
units. The next squadron due to convert is the former Tornado F.3 operating 11 Sqn, who were one of the last two Lightning squadrons in the RAF back
in 1988. After them 6 Sqn 'the flying can openers', now disposing of their Jaguar GR.3's, will be the next.
The only reason that the training units carry Squadron numberplates is because of the UK's massive defence cuts and the traditionalists in the RAF
are trying to keep these historic identities alive. Otherwise they would be called something like '229OCU' or similar.
[edit on 22-4-2006 by waynos]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 05:53 AM by Jezza
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 22-4-2006 @ 06:19 AM by echoblade
|
Yep subatomic, don't worry, no harm done nor intended, anyway since you're brit you're excused, I mean, it's not really your fault... errr... just
joking, really
cheers
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |