Originally posted by Mr Totality
Originally posted by Hyde70
I know why someone would send a package like this, but my first thought was...
DVD video's made in quicktime file's, .PDF file's and images. This package was made internet friendly, wasn't it? This way they could air it on
the news and the internet.
He looks sort of calm while he's reading what he wrote to the camera. He doesn't sound like someone who was truly hurt by society. You'd think
he'd be yelling and throwing a temper tantrum. The fact that he's so calm during all of this (the shootings, the recordings, etc) seems more like
he's just playing a part in something.
For a guy that has no military background and no hands-on training (that we know of), I've got to wonder why his shooting was so accurate.
dude if you truly believe that there is some conspiracy here, go seek help quickly
Well, not necessarily a conspiracy, but something just damn odd. Of all the mass killers up to now, did any opt for the full multimedia rant? And
of course, even if not a conspiracy, should we begin to ask the ever key question of "Qui bono?" If the answer is "no one", then definitely no
conspiracy.
Does anyone have concern about the volume of chatter around how this could of been pre-empted? For example, checking the feds database of everyone
who is on anti-depressants, cross referencing with prior complaints, noting that as his credit card purchased two guns, then hauling him in and
locking him up before he acted based on, what exactly? Certainly the dreaded total information awareness and sufficient analysis by law enforcement
may have been able to pre-empt this, but would that necessarily be an overall good thing when compared to the loss of privacy and freedom that would
be required?