Cmon guys there's nothing there.
It's been widely debunked for years.
www.badastronomy.com...
And "Greys" originated from HGWells scifi and allegid occult spiritual experiences.
en.wikipedia.org...-1950
Note: Pencil sketch on paper =
gray
www.boudillion.com...
Hoagland is further destroying his credibility in his other work by continuing on with this outlandish theory. Talk about bias.
www.msnbc.msn.com...
He's taking everyone he can for a ride.
As far as NASA goes, few could possibly distrust them more than I (I cant stress this enough, see my videos), but if there was a conspiracy here why
would they have even showed us the old image in the first place? The old image was interesting at first, but even it was never
that impressive
to begin with. The only time it actually looked like something was when it had the shadow angle. It ends there:
And then when you take all of Hoaglands -and the other advanced charts with overlays from the great pyramids- and apply them to the new crisp images I
dont even think they work how these propagators have claimed.
Ity usually goes that there were/are other pyramids right there, but the problem with this entire ordeal is the fact that the Egyptians and others
built pyramid shaped buildings
because they're the most survivable shape you can build with. Because of this, the face would have degenerated
long before the other pyramids... meaning we'd all be wondering over how the pyramids got there instead of this allegid face... if there actaully was
something there that was built by intelligent beings. Especially in the asserted case that these same beings built our great pyramids.
[edit on 16-4-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]
