Another thought or direction.....spent reactor fuel storage. Yucca mtn is to be a containment storage facility.
But many sites exist that store spent rods temporarily.
In the aftermath of September 11, a great deal of attention has been paid to nuclear power plants themselves, which are vulnerable to a World Trade
Center type of attack. Like the Twin Towers, reactor containment buildings were designed to withstand hurricanes, floods, or accidental aircraft
collisions of a certain scope. They were not designed with homicidal 767 operators in mind. "If you postulate the risk of a jumbo jet full of fuel,
it is clear that their design was not conceived to withstand such an impact," International Atomic Energy Agency spokesman David Kyd told reporters
in Vienna, Austria. Such a strike could disrupt a plant's cooling systems, triggering a steam explosion and releasing a radioactive cloud.
But spent fuel facilities are far softer targets. They are generally located outside the containment structure, and are thus more vulnerable to
attack. A recent report by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission says that the consequences of a serious spent fuel pool accident "could be comparable to
those for a severe reactor accident." The NRC analysis, published in February, also assumed that in the event of an accidental direct hit by an
aircraft, there was a 45 percent chance it would breach a five-foot thick containment structure. Dry-cask storage facilities -- like the one under
development at Wiscasset -- are probably even more vulnerable. There are 16 such facilities already in operation and many more planned or under
construction. They are usually unenclosed and, in the case of decommissioned plants, are not subject to the same level of security. Each has guards,
fences, and motion detectors to repel an infantry-style assault or an attempt to steal waste; but the two-story tall casks stand in even rows under
the open sky. Steve Kerekes, a spokesman for the industry-funded Nuclear Energy Institute, said dry cask facilities are "fairly robust sites" but
that questions about their vulnerability to terrorist attack were "a bit ahead of the curve."
"These facilities are designed to survive more serious events than the average building, but they haven't been designed to survive a direct hit
from a large commercial airplane," says Kelley Smith, spokesperson for two other decommissioned power plants -- Connecticut Yankee and Yankee Row --
which are also building dry cask sites. All the more reason, she says, for the government to take the waste to Yucca Mountain.
how about all the spent rods stored in water at nuclear power plants. dont tell me they are secure. ive driven a boat within 100 ft of some in the
past 8 months with no problem. just think if someone launched an RPG or worse into the spent rods. even if the radiation didnt cover a large area,
there would be mass histeria and distraction from a possible major event. just a thought
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.