Not only is music itself based almost exclusively on mathematic principals, but the instruments themselves are perfect examples of mathematic
perfection. For example, all stringed instruments are based and built on these principals...you pluck a note nearer the nut on one string the string
vibrations have a longer wavelength, making the note sound lower to human ears. Now, pluck another note closer to the bridge...the wavelength is
shortened and thus a higher note is observed. Also, stringed instruments have incredible pressure placed on them by the strings themselves (hundreds
of pounds of pressure in some cases) and this is what creates the resonance inside an acoustic instrument such as member of the viol family, violin
family, guitars, lutes, Oud's etc. Acoustic instruments such as these need incredible bracing inside the body of the instrument to prevent the tops
of them from caving in or cracking. There are essentially only a few notes in musical vocabulary such as:
A, A#/Bb, B, C, C#/Db, D, D#/Eb, E, F, F#/Gb, G, G#/Ab
All known instruments can only play these particular 12 notes and some blue notes, and they are recycled over and over again in order. However, what
makes the tone and pitch of an instrument sound higher/lower is the thickness of strings and where you place pressure on those strings on a stringed
instrument, or the pressure with which you blow into a woodwind or brass instrument as another example. Which of these notes one plays also
determines which one is likely to come next as there is a certain degree of being able to conclude this with great accuracy, and this gives rise to
the mathematical relationships in the Form of music (Rhythm Changes, Chord changes, AABA form, ABCA, etc...etc...). To save time explaining, just
look here:
Explanation
So, in relation to the topic at hand all of string wavelength, pressure, and resonance make you hear what you hear...all based on mathematical
principals.
Even other instruments such as the Trombone, flute, Saxophone, Clarinet, etc. are based on mathematical and physical principals that dictate the flow
of air through an instrument. Take the Trombone for instance, as you elongate air column the wavelength of air passing through the trombone changes
the pitch of the instrument and alters the frequency that the instrument is played at. The same principal works for most all wind instruments.
Now, as others have explained before, music itself is nothing more than a represenatation of mathematical principals that forecast and explain why a
certain note is played in a certain position. Lets just take a Waltz rhythm for example (a Waltz is a time signature in 3/4 meaning there are three
seperate 1/4 note beats), one starts out playing a simple waltz rhythm with three beats to the measure. Another person starts to solo over that
particular rhythm, and the notes he plays must fit in and equal the value of the entire measure. Thus if he decides to play a melody with only 1/8th
notes over the Waltz, there would be two 1/8th notes per 1/4 note...and it can be subdivided further than that as well. The whole principle of music
is built on fractions, geometry, ratios, intervals, etc. and even such extreme forms of music like the Free Jazz or Free Improvisation (no set meter,
form, BPM, and many other things) of Coltrane or Coleman is built on these principals or an arbitration of these principals in accordance with the
rules of music. I could go on and on for days talking about this, but I think to eliminate the need for me to created multiple posts please refer to
the following:
Wavelength
Math and Music on the Brain
Piano's and Fractions
Physics of Music
Now, someone can actually convert music into a form of mathematics, but the underlying conversion is and always will start with mathematics that
originally were laid down. Math remains the univeral language because of this...even simple things to understand like playing a sport rely solely on
mathematics...Fractional Geometry in many cases. You can break mathematical principals down to describe how everything works and why it works they
way it does, but as far as I am aware of there is nothing that can describe these mathematical fundamentals except for math itself...its sort of an
absolute!
Music is one of the forms of our senses: Hearing, tasting, feeling, seeing, etc. and to imply that all species that exist in the universe have these
same characteristics is norrowminded. Mathematics has been described as the "univeral language" because even without these human characteristics
another species would be able to understand it in one form or another.
Now, on a side note, I am a musician and in particular a Jazz musician at that. The music I play is for the most part based entirely upon
improvisation (playing with minimal forethought), but I think a lot of people get confused as to what exactly this means. Some people even go so far
as to suggest that there are some forms of music that are purely emotional and not based on mathematics...this is simply untrue. When someone
improvises what they are doing is listening to everyone else playing in a certain key and tempo, and then basing their playing on the chord changes
represented around a certain theme. The music, and in particular the melody you are hearing, are all based around certain principals and knowledge of
fractions. Even music that sounds as if it is "otherworldly" such as Free Jazz, and certain Improvisations has its fundamental roots in
mathematics. Even in these forms of music each musician is listening to the others in order to follow certain rules that have been preconceived.
All of this is exactly why music in particular will never precede mathematics as a universal language of sorts.
Great topic by the way!
[edit on 28-5-2007 by Jazzerman]