Ok, I guess that I will be part of this to the best of my ability which is somewhat time limited on various days.
A couple of things though:
1)Being an ex-airport worker, I am not going to post any of those credentials on this site. I would be happy to meet with a Mod at some public
location and let them review them, but it is really not worth the security risks involved to post them on the web. First off the type of
identification which a airline person can show, not only shows who they worked for but can also be photoshopped and used for less then honorable
reasons. I would hope that no one who has this kind of documentation would be so silly as to post copies of them on the web any sooner then they would
post a copy of their Social Security Card or Drivers License. Besides this, posting identification does not really go very far in showing that the
person behind the keyboard actually belongs to the documentation they posted. Most aviation folks can spot on another by lingo, and inside knowledge,
and that should be sufficient.
2) We have 5,000,000,000,000,000,000 different 911 threads going on all at one time on this site, and one that is like 5 million pages long now. All
the good information in that thread is so buried that someone does not have a snowballs chance in hell of digging it back up. This was one of the
reasons I quit posting on the 911 subject for a long time. I got really tired of spending an hour of my life explaining where the “wings and tail
went” to have someone come back three pages later with “yeah, but what happened to the wings and the tail”. If I ever went back and compiled all
my posts on what happened to the wings and the tail, I am sure it would fill a book. So with this in mind I suggest we approach this form a different
angle. I am not sure how well this will work and it might need some tweaking, but here goes.
I suggest that we compile a list of all the main points, topics, and questions. We make a single thread which acts like an index with a single
corresponding discussion thread attached to each individual topic. Then allow the Admin here to take the best valid points from those discussion
threads and put them into a sort of summery under that topic in the index thread. This index thread should be locked to all but the admin here, and it
might help keep the derail posts down to keep the discussion thread locked to only people that have registered for this discussion. It might also be
helpful to have a fair/balanced person in each discussion thread who sums up the finer points every so many pages and keeps the discussion on track.
So if we are discussing what happened to the “wings on the pentagon 757” we don’t end up talking about engines, tails, or what the hijackers had
for breakfast. Hopefully following this type of format we can finally get the key points down to where they can not be argued anymore and a conclusion
on each topic can be reached without someone taking us back to page one, or derailing the topic for several pages then taking us back to page one.
As an example (and this is only an example, lets not start arguing the content of what I write here):
What happened to the wings of AA Flight 77:
Wings of aircraft contain the fuel tanks which house 70% of the fuel used by the aircraft, it is also the fuel which is burned first leaving the tanks
which the highest amount of explosive vapor on an aircraft. When the leading edge of the aircraft wing came in contact with the building pilings
behind the fascia of the Pentagon structure the fuel tanks would have been pierced and fuel and fuel vapor exposed to the heat of friction from the
leading edge impact……blah,blah,blah…….Blahdy,blah……
Wings of Flight 77 Discussion
Wing damage to the Pentagon building from AA flight 77:
Blah, Blah, Blah…
Blah, Blah, Blah….
Wing Damage to Pentagon Discussion
Now not everyone here is going to be able, or have experience to discuss all the different aspects of each thread obviously, so we could limit each
discussion to specific people or not. I personally don’t know a lot about what brought down the Twin Towers, or anything about Demolition, for
example, so I would not really post in those topics, but maybe would make a good person to sum up what they posted in there.
Anyway that is my take on how this should be done so it actually gets somewhere.
Do with it as you will.
[edit on 5/2/2007 by defcon5]
A fact is established. And enforced. Repeated fallacies, issuing "facts" contrary to those so
established will result in post-banning from that forum. Frequent and binding votes by certain and balanced core members on who wins a specific debate
will be held, all opinions and reasons seen up front in the forum for all to reference. Appeals can be made via some mechanism to be ascertained.
Swift but fair judgment, all normal rules of propriety apply. 
