posted on Apr, 12 2007 @ 01:11 PM
The scum who re-named Negroes as 'blacks', used a tried and successful technique: that of repeating something over and over until it is accepted as
This was the philosophy behind Bush's repeatedly informing us that 'terrorists' were responsible for 9/11 -- also that 'Saddam' (and by virtue of
association ALL Iraqis) were 'terrorists' and 'evil doers' who were party to 'The Axis of Evil'.
In those first days after 9/11, when people were so emotional and affected, we heard repeatedly about 'Axis of Evil', 'evil doers',
Now, those who devised this 'repeat it often enough and the sheep will accept is as true' technique ALSO knew that messages slip past the
mental censors when individuals are emotional and under stress.
In short --- brain washing.
And there are swathes of folk out there right now who are under the influence of the brain-washing techniques to which they were subjected in the
hours and days after 9/11. They believe that Iraqis are 'evil' and are 'terrorists' who threaten the populations of the United States.
Some people are more susceptible to brain-washing techniques than others.
Others are able to regain their equilibrium and take control of their thoughts: are able to once again 'think for themselves'.
The *SAME* brain-washing techniques have been used regarding Negroes.
Negroes did *NOT* always fill US jails.
Negroes did *NOT* always use rap as a weapon both against themselves and non-Negro populations.
Negroes were *NOT* always so angry both towards themselves and non-Negro members of the community.
Negroes were *NOT* always heavily involved in drugs, crime, violence, self-hatred, hatred and resentment generally.
And not *ALL* Negroes today are typical of those portrayed on tv and in movies and the media generally.
The lying, fork-tongued scum (including whore media and paid 'politicians' etc.) who PRETEND to 'defend' Negroes are the very ones who are
portraying Negroes generally as 'useless' 'welfare' burdens on society.
The scum plotters CLAIM to support the 'black' cause, but what they are REALLY intent on doing is creating divisions and then widening
The scum want racial tension and racial disharmony and irreparable divisions between Negro and non-Negro populations.
But as always, the scum LIE about their agenda.
When they bestowed the label of 'black' (meaning 'negative') upon Negroes, they knew that a picture tells a thousand words.
They KNEW that each time people hear the word 'black', they associate it with negativity. 'Black' is *not* regarded as a 'good' thing or as a
'positive'. Villains are always shown dressed in black. Think Jack Palance in 'Shane'. Think Dracula. Think monsters. Think death. Think
'bad'. Think 'evil'.
In short, when Negroes allowed themselves to be described as 'black', they doomed themselves to the role of 'negative influences', of 'bad
people', of 'evil people', etc.
Instead of 'black' --- seeing the scum were so keen to inflict 'colour roles' on differing sectors of societies -- why didn't they instead use
the more practical colour 'brown' ?
'Brown' is NOT associated with 'evil' and 'bad' and 'death'.
No. 'Brown' is associated in people's minds with 'warmth', with 'comfort', with 'security', with 'class and style', with 'chocolate',
with 'coffee' ---- in other words, 'brown' is associated with NICE things. 'Brown' is a POSITIVE colour.
And Negroes are FAR more 'brown' than 'black'.
*IF* populations had been instructed to call Negroes 'brown' --- then the world would be a far happier more harmonious place today.
I can't understand WHY Negro leaders have not known this and REFUSED the label of 'black'.
And I STILL can't understand why everyone has obeyed the nonsensical, divisive demand to call Negroes ANY 'colour' at all !
WHERE were the wise heads when all this was going down?
WHY didn't people of ALL shades stand up and scream that they would *NOT* call Negroes ANY colour and would CONTINUE -- if they felt they had to
mention the fact at all -- to describe Negroes as simply that .... Negroes ?