Originally posted by Michael12
As for the questions regarding the alleged Plejaren planet, I don't have any more information than what was culled from the book and I'm not
qualified to comment on the possible accuracy of the information.
As much as I like the plejaren ..
See this table ( www.billymeier.com...
) next to a sum of other things (yes for example this gun also) crazy hard
screems Billy hoax! to me. These 4 * 2 values in the table contradicts itself because they are not independent of each other.
Think about it: You have and object with a given densitiy and given volume (over shape and radius). Can you calculate the mass of it?
-> Yes of course. Simple multiplication.
If you have 2 such objects given, same shape(*), can you calculate the 'surface gravitation factor' between the two? With the help of the gravity
constant and the law of gravity yes.
Is it 1.0003 like in the table? Nope, it's less than 1, sorry!
Should be traceable if you want to try it yourself.
This means if both of this planets would be in our universe/reality it simple doesn't work. I'd say someone failed to produce values that fits to
WAIT a minute, isn't Erra in an other universe/reality with different physical laws and nature constants(*)? A very preferred and practical standard
excusion when something is simple wrong. Funny thought to present then a table with for our physical realm 'useless' Erra data's. :/
Well the table itself.. funny first eye catcher..The missing planet mass.
Second: What!? A planet that EQUAL in the values like earth? Very suspect to name it but well fitting to someone that doesnt can risk so much simple
because he doesnt have the necessary knowledge to make it correct.
Then this surface gravity factor.. of 1.0003 .. does this make any sense?
Every normal being would simplify and say it is 1 or equal to the earth like as it has been done with the approx distance to the sun and the Orbital
time. My take..he calculated/judged that value with his limitted knowledge.
Make your thoughts.
*)There is more you can (try) do/check with this little 4*2 table values. If interested I can do/finish the work and create a thread and present my
little considerations/calculations and result.
But I guess that above is for the most already enough or too much and they don't want to read more about this 'table' and 'calculation' stuff in
a discussion forum and I on the other hand also not feel an urge to do that.