How can people be so brainwashed, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 05:13 PM by Essedarius
Originally posted by dariousg
There you go bud, putting words in my mouth. Never said anything about feeble.


Sorry, not feeble... just "sheep", "zombies", "lazy", "scared", "slaves", "doormats", "autotron no-minds", etc.

Can you do me a favor and check to be sure I captured all the insulting references correctly? I don't want to put words into anyone's mouth:

Originally posted by AwakeAndAllSeeing
It's right to call people in that state of mind sheep, it's what they are.


Originally posted by LightWorker13
...you better thank god there are people like us truthseekers who are here speaking out against this, or the American people would be complete doormats for their government...


Originally posted by Truth4hire
Wake up kitten. Don´t make me take away that headset and scream into your naked ears...


Originally posted by piacenza
The truth is dead and buried it will never ever come out.
The fault its first of the people that are to lazy and scared to accept reality.


Originally posted by clearwater
How can people be so brainwashed?


Originally posted by kix
Do you have debt? Slave to the system.
You need medicare Slave to the system
You Have to have the lattest stuff and gadgets Slave my friend.


Originally posted by In nothing we trust
I just think that the autotron no-minds should be left alone to do nothing if they so choose. But they are screwing it up for the rest of us.


Originally posted by YIAWETA
The average American gobbles it up like a panda to bamboo. The realization of the facts about their own country is too much to swallow for the masses. They sustain the fantasy that is imposed upon them with denile.


Originally posted by Jotfish
I don't like how alot of people out there still aren't thinking outside the box. That they still think the government loves and worships the ground the citizens walk on.



The Truth Movement has two tactics at this point:

a) Prove to everyone that the government engineered 9/11.

or

b) Prove to themselves that everyone is blind and/or stupid.

They've failed to do the first and now have almost entirely fallen back onto the second.

It's actually the second step in the 5 stages of grief: ANGER.


This will not apply though to the people that debate this topic. There wouldn't be a debate if you or any other believer of the official story were feeble minded.


This is the third stage: BARGAINING.

As part of the bargaining process, I will agree with you regarding your position on testifying and classified material.



reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 11:03 PM by pavil
Originally posted by Griff
[As far as I am aware, in NAZI Germany, the citizens could buy anything they wanted and travel to any place they wanted. Would those citizens also be considered "free and living in a free country"? Didn't think so. Lie to yourself all you want, but we are far from being free.


Ummmm then you need to raise your awareness level of Nazi Germany IMO. After 1933 Germany was a one party state dictatorship. If you were a Jew, you werent a German citizen after 1935. Not all citizens in Germany under the Nazi's could buy anything they wanted and travel to any place they wanted. Don't claim that.
www.historylearningsite.co.uk...

Here is some highlights for you:
Hitler asked Hindenburg to grant him emergency powers in view of the 'communist takeover'. Using the constitution, Hindenburg agreed to pass the Law for the Protection of the People and the State.

This law gave Hitler what he wanted - a ban on the Communists and Socialists taking part in an election campaign. The leaders from both parties were arrested and their newspapers were shut down. To 'keep the peace' and maintain law and order, the SA (the Brown Shirts) roamed the streets beating up those who openly opposed Hitler.



On 7th April 1933, Nazi officials were put in charge of all local government in the provinces.

On May 2nd 1933, trades unions were abolished, their funds taken and their leaders put in prison. The workers were given a May Day holiday in return.

On July 14th 1933, a law was passed making it illegal to form a new political party. It also made the Nazi Party the only legal political party in Germany.

For all the power the Enabling Act gave Hitler, he still felt threatened by some in the Nazi Party. He was also worried that the regular army had not given an oath of allegiance. Hitler knew that the army hierarchy held him in disdain as he was 'only ' a corporal in their eyes. The Night of the Long Knives not only removed the SA leaders but also got Hitler the army's oath that he so needed.









Jews in Nazi Germany prior to WW2
After January 1933, the Jews became the "Untermenschen" - the sub-humans. Nazi thugs stopped Germans from shopping in Jewish shops. By 1934, all Jewish shops were marked with the yellow Star of David or had the word "Juden" written on the window. SA men stood outside the shops to deter anyone form entering. This was not necessarily a violent approach to the Jews - that was to come later - but it was an attempt to economically bankrupt them and destroy what they had spent years building up.

On buses, trains and park benches, Jews had to sit on seats marked for them. Children at schools were taught specifically anti-Semitic ideas. Jewish school children were openly ridiculed by teachers and the bullying of Jews in the playground by other pupils went unpunished. If the Jewish children responded by not wanting to go to school, then that served a purpose in itself and it also gave the Nazi propagandists a reason to peddle the lie that Jewish children were inherently lazy and could not be bothered to go to school.

In 1935, the Nuremberg Laws were passed. The Jews lost their right to be German citizens and marriage between Jews and non-Jews was forbidden. It was after this law that the violence against the Jew really openly started. Those that could pay a fine were allowed to leave the country. Many could not and many shops refused to sell food to those who remained. Medicines were also difficult to get hold of as chemists would not sell to Jews.

On the 10th November (1938), the campaign started. 10,000 shops owned by Jews were destroyed and their contents stolen. Homes and synagogues were set on fire and left to burn. The fire brigades showed their loyalty to Hitler by assuming that the buildings would burn down anyway, so why try to prevent it? A huge amount of damage was done to Jewish property but the Jewish community was ordered to pay a one billion mark fine to pay for the eventual clear-up. Jews were forced to scrub the streets clean.





Sorry for the long quotes, there was a major case of someone claiming something that needed to be disproven.

You may think we are now far from free, however we are even farther from being a Nazi one state dictatorship. The comparison is not even close.



reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 11:52 PM by pavil
Originally posted by LightWorker13
I challenge anyone to prove the official story of 911. We have done our job bringing you the proof to support our side, you bring proof to support yours.


No offence but most of your "proof" is based on conjecture that can't seem to find physical proof for.



So again, I challenge anyone to provide reasonable proof, and dont quote some government source that says "this is what happened" show some real tangible proof that 19 hijackers flew the planes into the buildings.


Granted this is from an unsucessful highjack crash attempt, but it still is evidence. Probably faked in your eyes right? Even though the people on the ground in the recordings are still alive.
www.thememoryhole.org...
Ok do you think this is fabricated as well? If you think everything is fabricated than how can we use it to convince you. Your mind is already closed and made up is it not. Denial of evidence and automatically throwing it out is hardly a way to prove your theory.




You cant because the proof was fabricated to begin with. Fake hijacker passport, fake confession tapes, fake cell phone calls, I mean it was a lie from the start.


Slow down there. First prove that all the things you say are fake are? You are the one contending that, you must prove it. Just cause you say it is faked does not make it so. See where this is a pointless discussion? How can someone debate someone who is always right with no need to prove their side?

You contend that the WTC's fell not due to the airliners hitting but what exactly? Give me your personal belief as to the exact mechanisms that took place to cause the WTC's and the Pentagon attacks on 9/11.



Tryint to fix nested quotes


[edit on 12-4-2007 by pavil]

[edit on 12-4-2007 by pavil]


reply posted on 13-4-2007 @ 12:38 AM by LightWorker13
Again, you guys give no proof of your own....

Well, since you seem to be unaware of it, lets talk about the sham called the hijackers passports. You dont wanna give me proof, so Ill give me your proof. Just to examine it logically, and dive into the details of the official story. Please read this till the end.

Did you know that not 1 but 2 passports were claimed to be found by the State Department? One at ground zero, one at the Pentagon, how convenient (not to mention the passports found at the london train bombings, all 4 of them).

So let me get this straight. We have a paper passport in the pants of a hijacker on a plane about to fly into the WTC. Everyone who was on that plane has one. Plane crashes, huge explosion, massive fireball, crashed metal, mangled bodies, wreckage, heat that supposedly melted structural steel, masses of bodies never to be found.

And miraculously, out of the ether....Poof! Out of all the passports to survive, a hijackers passport is found a flew blocks from ground zero; next to the body of former FBI John Oneil who quit because he knew the government got warnings and were doing nothing about it, and september 10 was hired to work in the WTC.

Mustve been an act of God.

Yet another act of God. In 2005, years later, the Pentagon puts out a report saying they had found another passport at the Pentagon with Flight 93. Let us examine this closely. Barely any wreckage of the plane was found. The only wreckage that survived could be picked up by hand. No bodies of any of the people on that were on that plane were found, not even the hijackers. But, again, a paper passport can survive, practically unscathed, that just insults the intelligence!

Now from these passports, within hours, they were able to get the names, pictures, affiliations and history, of 19 hijackers, when they had no idea it was gonna happen they said. Please, insult my intelligence some more.

And, as its comes out, did you know that out of the 19 supposed hi-jackers, at least 7 have reported themselves to be alive and well, and working for legitimate business's. In fact one guy, who goes by the name Abdullaziz Al-Amori, is actually a Flight Attendant for Saudi Airlines, and the day after 911, called the US embassy in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and asked "why am I being named a hijacker?"

Well, gee, I guess if passports can survive, they can parachute!!

It is utter nonsense. Its funny because when the State Department came out and said "look what we found, we found the passports of the hijackers, we got the proof!" people were like " oh they were right then, it was them damn arabs!"

Then it comes out it was a lie, the people were still alive, this was in the mainstream media for a short time. But when the SD was questioned about the fake passports, they just said "yea that was a mistake, were sorry" and the story just disappeared! Never mentioned again!!

Its ridiculous, and you cant tell me you didnt know or that Im making all this up, when a quick google search will show you all you need to know, nevermind doing your own investigating like I have. Its ridiculous, the official story makes no sense, if you want, I can dissect it even more for you.

But again, my challenge is still on. Provide me with some proof to discount my proof, or provide me with some proof to prove your case. Id like to hear it.


[edit on 13-4-2007 by LightWorker13]


reply posted on 13-4-2007 @ 01:14 AM by pavil
Originally posted by LightWorker13
Again, you guys give no proof of your own....


I gave you some proof yet you don't even mention it. Tell me why that is not evidence/proof in your mind? Was the whole conversation faked in realtime as the event was occurring? How? How about the video of the planes themselves crashing into the WTC's? Are those pieces of proof for you. You do admit that those planes struck the WTC's at least right?

If 19 Arab highjackers did not take over those planes, what in your mind happend on those flights? I am very curious and await your answer.

Lightworker, I wasn't there and I don't claim to have personal inside proof. I honestly don't know what you are asking for. If you will not consider any of the current eveidence as it is "tainted" by the government, I don't know what would work for you. Would only 9/11 truth movement evidence be the only acceptable proof?

As to a passport surviving the crash, why is that totally impossible or even improbable? Objects far larger than that had survived the impact, or do you even doubt that? Not everything in the crashes were totally vaporized as you seem to imply. Do you deny this?

If your claim of faked passports is true and highjackers still alive after attacks, why haven't they been reported more and revealed? Surely these would be important facts. These are logical questions in response to your theory? Since yours is the theory in doubt, first try proving your side, before you do other things. As someone else said, show me a peer reviewed paper on ANY aspect of ANY 9/11 conspirarcy theory? Go ahead, look for them and post them.



reply posted on 13-4-2007 @ 03:35 AM by GwionX
Originally posted by LightWorker13 And, as its comes out, did you know that out of the 19 supposed hi-jackers, at least 7 have reported themselves to be alive and well, and working for legitimate business's. In fact one guy, who goes by the name Abdullaziz Al-Amori, is actually a Flight Attendant for Saudi Airlines, and the day after 911, called the US embassy in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and asked "why am I being named a hijacker?"


No , no no! you have it ALL wrong, dude. There was no hijacker by the name of Abdullaziz Al-Amori.. You must be talking about Abdul Aziz Alomari (AKA Abu Abbas Al Janoobi).

Who you ARE referring to though is Waleed *A Alshehri, He is a pilot for Saudi Airlines.

This is Waleed A Alshehri:



He wasn't a hijacker at all, although there was an incorrect preliminary report that he was Wail Alshehri ...Here:



In this CNN photo not only has Waleed *A Alshehri identified as Wail Alshehri (pictured below) but has Abdulaziz Alomari incorrectly identified as well...First, here is Wail Alshehri the brother of Waleed *M (as in Mohammed) Alshehri:

Wail Alshehri the terrorist:



Wail looks nothing like the Saudi Pilot Waleed A Alshehri-- But he does look like his brother, and fellow terrorist Waleed M Alshehri:

Waleed M Alshehri the terrorist:



Now that you know Who exactly works for Saudi Airlines (waleed A Alshehri), and who were terrorists (Waleed M Alshehri and Wail Alshehri), and why that CNN report was incorrect; we can now look at just WHO this Alomari character is.

The Alomari pictured in the CNN report was NOT the terrorist Abdul Aziz Alomari(AKAAbu Abbas Al-Janoobi). Here is a picture of the terrorist Abdul Aziz Alomari:



Here is a picture of the terrorist Abdul Aziz Alomari with Mohammed AttaIn the United States on September 10th 2001 at an ATM machine:



Here is a video of the terrorist Abdul Aziz Alomari speaking at an Al Queda meeting in the presence of other known 9/11 terrorists, and the Al Queda leadership:


Here is a video of the terrorist Abdul Aziz Alomari's martyrdom video, and A security camera photo of Alomari and Atta beyond the airport security check area in Portland, Maine on 9/11 2001-- if you take the time to read his words his intentions are clear:


If you are interested in the first two segments of these videos the links are below:

Part 1:
www.youtube.com...

Part2:
www.youtube.com...


Huge credit to Mike W for the organization of this information
and MarkyX for making the videos avalible in many types of forums.




















[edit on 13-4-2007 by GwionX]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 16 days ago with 14 member flags
Newest 9/11 Documentary - Proof 9/11 was an inside Job
  Posted 0 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags