goverment controled weather, page
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 16-4-2007 @ 02:40 PM by Eden
@notgov
Can you tell us why you believe that only after 9/11 the government was controlling the weather?

The US government and it's weather experiments started long before 9/11. Yes, you see jet contrails. Yes, you see lingering trails in the sky that 'were not there' before. Yes, those trails can increase cirrus cloud cover. That does not mean anything nefarious is going down.
Chaff is very useful as radar countermeasure Chaff can also explain why so many people(mostly chemtrailers) see spider web like glittering fibers over trees/plants/etc.

the government can modify the weather, chaos theory does not allow them control it

example:
\\VIETNAM: Operations POPEYE to increase rainfall over the Ho Chi Minh trail to slow the transportation of supplies from the north conducted from Udorn, Thailand from 1967 to 1972 China Lake facility major involvement

\\cloud seeding to increase precipitation ie: muddying dirt roads decreasing traction, flood fields & rivers; increase cirrus cloud cover to deny visual satellite & high altitude recons


reply posted on 21-4-2007 @ 09:20 PM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Originally posted by Brother Stormhammer
Can someone provide some evidence that the government can 'control the weather'?



How about evidence that they intend to?


"Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025"
"US aerospace forces can "own the weather," as they "own the night" now."
"It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes."
"Though a high-risk effort, the investment to do so would pay high rewards."
"Weather modification offers both the commercial sector and the military greatly enhanced capabilities."
"Its application in the military arena is a natural development as well. Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally"
"The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, and the production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies to achieve global awareness, reach, and power."
web.archive.org...://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/


That's one source. There are others.

Because of this many people now declare that they can and already do it.

My research in the military's artificial intelligence programs brought me to this subject. Most specifically NASA's role in the broad multi-agency multi-program effort... the Intelligent Archives.

Now i don't know whether they can already manipulate weathers or at what scale, but I suspect that if they can it's only on a "small" scale as they're efforts in AI/IA seem to indicate that the system is a primary catalyst for their goals.

My latest video puts it altogether best, but it's a scaled down version of what it could be in regards to the quotes used in it which were all selected for their effectiveness in creating a streamlined narrative from scores of documents and programs.


Google Video Link


Vide o Resource Page

ATS Discussion Thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...


reply posted on 22-4-2007 @ 09:23 AM by Tom Bedlam
As far as 2025 goes, Ignorance, I will bet you don't have a clue where that came from, who wrote it, or why.

The sites you got your info from...did they tell you? Did they just excerpt the good bits and toss it out there with the implication that it was some sort of secret paper they'd dug up for you? That's what usually happens, because it's just not all that mysterious or conspiratorial if they don't.

Before you get all hot and bothered, you should take a look at who wrote the paper, for whom, and for what reason.

2025 was written at Maxwell AFB by students at Air University, including a lot of AFROTC cadets. It was a "set of projected futures". It wasn't some RAND analysis of current technology. It was a senior project.

But they never mention that, do they?

This and the appendix in Vol 4 Chapter 3 describing the "holographic projector" (btw, this idea came from a Hollywood producer they invited as a speaker, not Sandia or something) are often cited but are always taken out of context.

Anyways, here is a URL for the website archives. It looks like they've messed around with the site and broken some of the links but if you use this index page you can generally find anything. The links within the pages look like they're messed up, so you may have to return to the index to move from page to page instead of using the links inside the pages themselves. Some work, some don't. You should read the preface material stem to stern, there's a lot of it, to get a really good idea of the reasons that they wrote it. It doesn't describe on-going projects or "secret technology" - they were trying to blue-sky what it might be like 30 years in the future. And no, I don't think they "revealed the true secret military capability!!11!!" to the AFROTC cadets and new little LT's at tactics school.

csat.au.af.mil...

From the intro:



The Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Ronald R. Fogleman, tasked the Air University at Maxwell AFB, AL to look 30 years into the future to identify the concepts, capabilities and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the 21st century. The Air University commander led a team of students and faculty from the Air University’s Air War College and Air Command and Staff College; scientists and technologists from the Air Force Institute of Technology, located at Wright-Patterson AFB, OH; Air Force Academy and AFROTC cadets from around the country; and selected academic and business leaders in the civilian community across the nation in the 10-month effort to meet General Fogleman’s tasking.

The resulting study is called Air Force 2025 or 2025 for short.


edit: formatting error



[edit on 22-4-2007 by Tom Bedlam]


reply posted on 22-4-2007 @ 02:13 PM by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
What makes you think I'm going to get hot and bothered?


Lady, I never walk into a place I don't know how to walk out of.
-Robet DeNiro, in RONIN



Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
And no, I don't think they "revealed the true secret military capability!!11!!"


Nice. I love how you're implying that's what I asserted. I asserted intentions, not capabilities. But it's not like the DOD hasn't been trying to modify the weather for decades:

www.allthingspass.com...

Or like they couldn’t have bought or matched the Soviets capabilities:


Could this devastation have been avoided? Could Katrina itself have been avoided as a death-dealing hurricane?
The answers to both questions are probably “Yes.” The ability of Russia and the United States to create storms of this magnitude definitely exists.
On Oct. 2, 1992, The Wall Street Journal reported that a Russian company, Elate Intelligent Technologies, Inc., has weather control equipment for sale and uses the advertising slogan of “weather made to order.”
www.americanfreepress.net...



Originally posted by Brother Stormhammer
isn't a 'source'


Why wasn’t there a disclaimer like you normally find in front of academic papers from ‘normal’ cadets?


Benign Weather Modification
Disclaimer
Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author(s), and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited.
www.au.af.mil...


Originally posted by IgnoranceIsntBlisss
which were all selected for their effectiveness in creating a streamlined narrative from scores of documents and programs.
...
There are others.


That study:

Here’s a direct .mil link to the PDF:
stinet.dtic.mil...
(Also, Here’s other declassified .mil documents: Link)


A declassified version of a 2-year study prepared by the Air War College and obtained by PM reveals that this is no dreamland scenario. The Pentagon's top meteorologists believe the United States will be ready to fight--and win--a weather war early in the next century.
www.popularmechanics.com...



The study was called Air Force 2025. What follows are the unclassified final results of that study. They offer a rich glimpse into the future- suggesting the clear imperatives and the important risks and opportunities the United States Air Force might face at the start of the new century.
web.archive.org...://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/


Originally posted by Tom Bedlam
2025 was written at Maxwell AFB by students at Air University, including a lot of AFROTC cadets.


The Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, General Ronald R. Fogleman, tasked the Air University at Maxwell AFB, AL to look 30 years into the future to identify the concepts, capabilities and technologies the United States will require to remain the dominant air and space force in the 21st century.
The Air University commander led a team of students and faculty from the Air University's Air War College and Air Command and Staff College; scientists and technologists from the Air Force Institute of Technology, located at Wright-Patterson AFB, OH; Air Force Academy and AFROTC cadets from around the country; and selected academic and business leaders in the civilian community across the nation in the 10-month effort to meet General Foglemans tasking.
web.archive.org...://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/


by Col Tamzy J. House, Lt Col James B. Near, Jr., LTC William B. Shields (USA), Maj Ronald J. Celentano, Maj David M. Husband, Maj Ann E. Mercer, Maj James E. Pugh
web.archive.org...

I’d hardly call them cadets, but whatever cadets were used in the overall study I’d bet that they were the best and brightest as they weren’t simply whatever ones were bored at the academy, they were “cadets from around the country”. Call it a hunch, but most of those same cadets probably remain in the Air Force etc living out their ‘dreams’ here, but those are still the cadets that [I]helped[/I] in this overall project.

It seems that the Maxwell AFB AIR WAR COLL already had some background in this area:

Link

It being a “college” doesn’t really change much either, as if you’re knowledgeable about developments in areas such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience and so on you know that many of the greatest advances come from the efforts of university campuses and virtually all national technology agencies recruit them for such purposes. Here we’re talking about a military “University”.

Evidence they 'began' funding it:


Detailed Fields of Science and Engineering; atmospheric sciences
aeronomy; extraterrestrial atmospheres; meteorology; solar; weather modification

SOURCE: RAND, based on National Science Foundation/Division of Science Resources Studies, Federal Funds for
Research and Development: Fiscal Years 1999, 2000, and 2001
www.rand.org...





[edit on 22-4-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



F-22 Pilots Told Not to Talk
  Posted 18 days ago with 23 member flags
Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
Reports of Rumbling in the Sky: Pulsejet Technology?
  Posted 13 days ago with 3 member flags