It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Edit: Oh wait, I see the significance of metallurgy. It's used for making swords, and fighting, and making war, and dominance. At least it was for it's early stages. The Catholic church had swords, which they used to forcibly kill and destroy people briinging in new knowledge for centuries.
Moor
"North African, Berber," 1390, from O.Fr. More, from M.L. Morus, from L. Maurus "inhabitant of Mauritania" (northwest Africa, a region now corresponding to northern Algeria and Morocco), from Gk. Mauros, perhaps a native name, or else cognate with mauros "black" (but this adj. only appears in late Gk. and may as well be from the people's name as the reverse). Being a dark people in relation to Europeans, their name in the Middle Ages was a synonym for "Negro;" later (16c.-17c.) used indiscriminately of Muslims (Persians, Arabs, etc.) but especially those in India.
FYI, that middle eastern knowledge progressed through Northern Africa. And through the Moors. That's how Europe got it.
Originally posted by Marduk
careful now you're starting to sound like you have an agenda.
if that were really the case then the islamic world would now be the ones with all the Nukes and first world countries.
posted by Cinlung
Forget the Moor, now we have Mujaheedeen and Al Qaeda.
Originally posted by Marduk
posted by Cinlung
Forget the Moor, now we have Mujaheedeen and Al Qaeda.
and you support those two groups do you Cinlung ?
Originally posted by jimboman
Oh for goodness sake. The OP just asked for info about the Moors. He didn't want to start another session of the western world vs Islamic countries guff!
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
For centuries European educators, influenced and biased by Nazi tales of White superiority, have tried to hide and thus deny that The Moors were Black African Muslims. Euro historians and educators who often corrupt and repaint history of the world in a brite white color in order to make people of the world believe that only White People have ever accomplished anything worthy of mention almost destroyed all evidence of the Moors Blackness. D
1. Africans in the Birth and Expansion of Islam. Golden Age of the MOORS. Edited by Ivan Van Sertima. New Bronswick Transaction Press, 1992: 151-181
3. The Moors in Africa and Europe: Origins and Definitions. Golden Age of the Moor. Edited by Ivan Van Sertima. New Brunswick: Transaction Press, 1992: 9-26.
Van Sertima has been criticized by academics for making ill-founded Afrocentric claims. They ruled as "fallacious" his claims for the diffusion of pyramid building and mummification. In addition, they accused Van Sertima's cultural outlook of being disparaging to Native American achievements. Van Sertima has sparred with some of his critics, but he did not respond to the 1997 Journal of Current Anthropology criticism.
British scholar Glyn Daniel called Van Sertima's work "ignorant rubbish”, concluding that the writings of Van Sertima “give us badly argued theories based on fantasies.”. Dean R. Snow, a professor of anthropology, in 1981 wrote that Van Sertima "uses the now familiar technique of stringing together bits of carefully selected evidence, each surgically removed from the context that would give it a rational explanation." He goes on, "The findings of professional archaeologists and physical anthropologists are misrepresented so that they seem to support the [Van Sertima] hypothesis."