It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Heronumber0
I am referring to the chaos that was apparently present on the Earth billions of years ago to give life to rective elements which apparently gave rise to a cell which apparently gave rise to humans.
Originally posted by shrunkensimonTo sum up, evolution as science knows it is far from a complete theory. However, the time of Darwinian-Einsteinian logic is almost over
Originally posted by DarkSide
Originally posted by shrunkensimonTo sum up, evolution as science knows it is far from a complete theory. However, the time of Darwinian-Einsteinian logic is almost over
Yeah, it's time to follow shrunkensimon into the dark ages
Originally posted by Heronumber0
I have to throw the cat amongst the pigeons here. I don't believe in evolution any more.
Give me proof that 10 billion years of chaos makes a human being capable of consciousness, language and recursive thought.
I have read Dawkins and material from other equally brilliant and erudite neo Darwinists and they still show a plan or a scheme for evolution dependent upon survival as the key.
I have also read material from Molecular Biologists pointing out exactly the opposite, i.e. a plan or scheme dependent on God as the designer.
From what I have read, the greatest challenge for evolutionists is at the molecular level and at the level of the evolution of a single cell. NO one can explain it to me with any sense....
Originally posted by Heronumber0
We cannot come up with a theory that says blind chaos gives rise to a conscious being with the most sophisticated design possible. If you believe in chaos then you would conceive of a scenario where a tornado or infinite tornadoes in a scrap yard would eventualy pick up all the spare parts to make a perfect Lamborghini Diablo- with the engine running and the keys inside! Because that is what evolution theory suggests and there are scientists in 2007 who are prepared to be quite militant about this theory - to the extent of marginalising scientists who do not believe it. A dangerous development.
Originally posted by shrunkensimon
Originally posted by DarkSide
Originally posted by shrunkensimonTo sum up, evolution as science knows it is far from a complete theory. However, the time of Darwinian-Einsteinian logic is almost over
Yeah, it's time to follow shrunkensimon into the dark ages
Wow, that was hilarious As per usual, whenever i lay it down, i get someone coming back with a joke against what i've said. Lose the ego and actually debate against me ffs.
Originally posted by Johnmike
Evolution is a theory. It is possible. Maybe even likely. But it is no fact, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.
Originally posted by masterp
As for Christianity, I wonder why it is considered the religion that is correct. Why shouldn't Buddhism be the one true religion, for example?
Originally posted by Heronumber0
I believe neformore that Silicon is capable of forming more compounds than carbon. So why carbon? Moreover, just believing that Time alone is capable of creating self replicating molecules is as fanciful as Time worship.
Originally posted by frenzy_boy
good point about species that haven't are staying the same for a long time
Originally posted by thehumbleone
I know, how about evolutionists go to heck and stop forcing their beliefs on me.
Evolution never was, is, or will be a fact.
Have a horrible day.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
sorry, i can't return the sentiment on this one. SNIP.