I get no such bar using the latest google earth browser on a Mac. Most likely a software glitch on your machine? Do you get the same anomaly using a dedicated google browser/web browser?

Hrmm, well perhaps it was simply due to the site i was using...no idea.
Thank you for the responses.

Edit:
I downloaded google earth and used that instead of flashearth. no white bar now, however you still cannot zoom in very much. I still say they are purposely blocking any real view of it. Why is it that in so many other places you can zoom in alot, but not there?

odd.


[edit on 9-4-2007 by WhiteWash]

Well there sure is a lot of evidence of traffic that seems to just appear from that white sand, going east but there are no other tracks in or out of the sand.
So maybe theyre driving into somewhere that can only be seen from the ground.

I agree Kronos...seems a little odd for all that traffic with nothing visible.

examine this close-up carefully:



I definitely see what looks like to Me, anyway man made structures. You can see with this same photo but with my outlines the straight lines that appear to be doors, or "hangars".
Compare for yourself. Natural rock formations do not exhibit such obvious straight lined structures:



Of course, this is just my opinion, and what I see.

Originally posted by WhiteWash

Edit:
I downloaded google earth and used that instead of flashearth. no white bar now, however you still cannot zoom in very much. I still say they are purposely blocking any real view of it. Why is it that in so many other places you can zoom in alot, but not there?

odd.


[edit on 9-4-2007 by WhiteWash]

There are a lot of places on the planet which is still displayed in very low resolution. Probably means nothing. That said, low resolution imagery would be a very convenient way of covering things up. IF there currently is such a thing as "S4" on that very location i seriously doubt it would show up on google earth or any other satelite imagery.

IMHO it would also not make very much sense to have such a location located at the same place for years and years. Eventually a place like this will pick up some interest and while it´s suitable to keep the interest up by showing off some weird lights every now and then i would surely move the really good stuff elsewhere away from prying eyes.

Remember the ballistic missile railroad network...that´s the way to go. Keeping things on a constant move make things harder to locate although it will also be easier to be spotted but that´s ok since you will be long gone a couple of days down the road.

Whitewash,

I have to respectfully disagree with you in the issue of Potential hanger sites. I just ran my own search on Google Earth, and examined the Area where you marked as a possible site for camoflaged hangers. What you are seeing is a natural rock formation. I believe that what appeared to you as a straite line, may infact have been an optical illusion. Occasionly, when the sun falls in just the right angle, and the sattelite is in the right spot, you get a shadow effect. The rock that makes up the mountains has a darker color, so if a shadow falls just right, it appears to be a part of the rock, when in fact it is not! The overlying shadow gave the illusion that there was a straight line there, when (in fact) no straight line ever existed.

I truely believe this is what you were looking at!

Respectfully,

Tim

Ghost01:
Thank you for your post.
The study of satellite imagery is one of my more extensive hobbies.
While you are obviously entitled to your opinion, you can Clearly see "lined" structures. These in my opinion are not shadows. I am quite schooled in what a shadow looks like upon the ground in sat images. The white lines i drew indicate where you should look. They clearly show the rock mass, shaped into man-made items. While I respect your right to your opinion, and thank you for it, I must disagree.

Okay, here is a perfect example. I downloaded google earth yesterday. Type in the coordinates: 62 23.5' N, 145 8.8' W - this is the HAARP project's 2nd location. Look at the blatant difference in resolution between the south and north side of the installation. Could be a coincidence, but it seems like their hiding something on the north side of the base.

collielikethedog:
I definitely see what you mean. Those coordinates are very odd..of course I know of h.a.a.r.p., and it certainly seems "smeared" to block the view. Of course some folks would have you believe it is just because some areas are in high def and some still in low def. However, as in the case of Darfur we know this is a falsehood. We are being blocked from accessing many places.

Gfad:
Yes, I agree about the most southerly line. It most certainly seems to be more than first meets the eye. Thank you for the link as well, I will take a look.



[edit on 12-4-2007 by WhiteWash]