....Right Winger short comings! Damn boys ( Bob & Prank) these are cartoons intended for a Lampoon of a very real ......reality!
No one has based these arguments solely on a cartoon, though they are both 100% factual.
Please tell me that these attempted smears by Fox/CNN/MSNBC, et al have not
been hurled at Dean, as some sort of "reasoning" on his doomed
- Too Liberal
- Too Vermont ( Northeaster)
- Too many idealists in his camp
- Too Angry
Please tell me what the White House has offered
besides the 9/11 incident, as the root cause reason on their inertia of action & utter failure
to implement course corrections on the economy?
A two bit dictator, from a third world country, whose military got knocked back to fourth world status after GW 1, with weapons stores equivalent to
the next 50 of the worlds military nations, whose country has sustained un-ending bombing since 1991 [- 280,000 Sorties flown over Iraq
since the Gulf War by the US
- Since December 1998, the UK Ministry of Defence has admitted dropping 780 tonnes of bombs on a country with which Britain is not at war.
Bombing that was never sanctioned in the first place, BTW
Yeah, the US is sooooo much safer with Saddam out of the Spider Hole & in our web!
"I won't defend any politician"
Really? Seems much was written in defense of spurrious claims of equality on the Bush/Cheney side with Dean?
Bush had his records sealed and sent into private storage, an act not done by any past US gov.
. They are at his fathers library.
Cheney's commission drove the national energy policy of the lone World Superpower
, and was not attended
by anyone outside of industry
executives, though the policy impacts us all - particularly our environment.
Dean's supposed energy closed door meetings? Never heard of them, but I'll search....Newsmax, Free Republic, Rush.com? Were there
sanctions/lawsuit/congressional inquiries brought against his administration, as was against the Bush team? Did his administration have a bunch of
folks on it who came out of Enron too?
"strikes me as kooky"
Yes, I forgot that after 2000, we pick president's based on popularity and how they express their
"Christian values/Moral Clarity/straight shooterness",
though the reality is
"Christian in a Lucifer sort of way/Lack of Morals is crystal clear/10 minute scripted press confrences - can't get straighter than that, though
nothing was answered"
In nearly 4 years, it's sad to see people still making a monumental choice ( President of the US) on adjectives
( "kooky", "boring",
"mechanical", "stright shooter", "angry") ........after seeing, in those 4 years, what a fecal nugget they've allowed to fester & how his
vision has handicapped our nation.
I suggest anyone with a brain cell starts to explore how they can back initiatives for:
a) open format debates without foreknowledge of questions, with at least several to take place.
b) verified voting results
It's the only way to avoid another theft of the presidency. If he's the nominee, and we have open debates and we have verified ballots....Dean will
win, with the largest swing Demographic being "Republicans for Dean".