Chinese Planners Took Credit for 9/11

page: 1
7

log in

join

posted on Nov, 24 2002 @ 03:24 AM
link   
This is from NewsMax.com

China's Military Planners Took Credit for 9/11

Soon after the horrific attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon,
two high-ranking Chinese military planners took credit for the 9/11
attacks and were even hailed as national heroes in China.

In fact, three years before 9/11, the Chinese colonels had proposed the
attacks and cited Osama bin Laden by name in their book "Unrestricted
Warfare."

The authors of "Unrestricted Warfare" are Senior Cols. Qiao Liang and
Wang Xiangsui, and in 1999 they wrote that an attack by bin Laden on the
World Trade Center would be just the type of "unrestricted warfare"
that could bring down America.

The book was published by China's People's Liberation Army and had the
endorsement of the Chinese government.

"Unrestricted Warfare" makes clear its purpose: offering China and
other "weak" countries a strategy to destroy the U.S. without a full-scale
invasion, using unusual or "asymmetrical" warfare.

NewsMax has recently obtained the CIA translation of this astounding
book and has made it available with an introduction by Al Santoli, editor
of the prestigious China Reform Monitor.

The importance of this book was highlighted soon after 9/11, when the
Chinese colonels were treated as national heroes.

In one interview with the Chinese government-owned Ta Kung Pao
newspaper in Hong Kong, the colonels offered little sympathy for the Americans
killed in 9/11.

They told the paper, "The series of attacks taking place in the United
States were very dreary and terrifying, but they must not be viewed
from a single perspective" that is, the U.S. as victims. The colonels
then added coldly that the Americans "were victims of U.S. foreign
policy."

The colonels were quick to take credit for the attacks on the World
Trade Center, telling the paper their strategy had worked and that
"September 11, 2001 very likely is the beginning of the decline of the United
States, as a superpower."

Qiao and Wang offer in "Unrestricted Warfare" several new methods for
destroying the U.S. from manipulating U.S. media, to homicide-suicide
bombing, to using immigrants as a fifth column, and even employing
cyber attacks to destroy America's critical infrastructure.

Both colonels agreed that the unconventional attacks of 9/11 were right
from the pages of their book, and they demonstrated their theory works.
"The attacks demonstrated the United States' fragility and weakness and
showed that essentially it is unable to stand attacks. ... The United
States, a giant tiger, has been dealing with mice; unexpectedly, this
time it was bitten by mice it has been wielding a large hammer but has
been unable to find the flea.

"From a short-term perspective, the attacks in the United States will
very likely have some effect on China's economy they might affect
China's economic growth. However, from a long-term viewpoint, they could be
favorable to China."

"Unrestricted Warfare" has set off alarm bells among several
high-ranking U.S. officers.

Adm. Thomas Moorer, former chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff, warns,
"'Unrestricted Warfare' reveals China's game plan in its coming war with
America." He adds ominously, "China thinks it can destroy America by
using these tactics."

Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub, former chief of staff of U.S. Forces Korea,
shares Adm. Moorer's view.

"The 9/11 attacks may just be the beginning. Many terrorist nations and
groups will try to imitate this operation," Gen. Singlaub said, noting
"China's war book 'Unrestricted Warfare' will be their text."




posted on Nov, 24 2002 @ 07:42 AM
link   
mad scientist, did you read the White Papers, written by Chinese generals to give their leaders an idea of which way they are headed? Apparently, their goal is to be positioned where they can strike Taiwan with S-S missiles hard enough so that she has no effective military or command and control, and at the same time strike U.S. military assets in South Korea, Japan and in the nearby waters, so that the U.S. would not be able to respond immediately and to have enough ICBM's pointed toward America to make good the threat of retaliation if the U.S. did try and intervene.

Will they be able to be in position by 2004, as they were hoping to be? I dunno, but between that and the reported fact that their military trains as though we are their enemy should make it very clear to us that we are their enemy, and we should not forget that whenever our nation deals with them, oe even when we go to the local store to buy a pair of shoes.



posted on Nov, 24 2002 @ 10:22 AM
link   
Ahhhhh
Falcon's forecast seem to be working fine.



posted on Nov, 24 2002 @ 07:50 PM
link   
what have i been tellin all of you btw tyler thx for remembering my theory



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 03:44 AM
link   
interesting thread - interesting theory -

i believe china is positioning itself within the u.s. - there has even been talk about the china connection with the world trade center -




The transaction represents the second major corporate tenant to lease office space in One World Trade Center. China Center New York LLC, a division of Vantone Industrial Co., Ltd., signed a 190,810 square-foot lease in March, 2009. Vantone will occupy a portion of the 64th floor and the entire 65th through 69th floors.
www.cushwake.com...

seems like they are positioning themselves across the u.s. - www.abovetopsecret.com...

endoftheamericandream.com...



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 04:03 AM
link   
why would they want to do that. the US is such good buttkissers for china, why would china want to do that?

if we try to NOT do what they want, sure, maybe... but what part of their butt has the US not kissed?

How is there a problem between us and China? Everytime someone says that i think that is what someone wants people to think to confuse people.

Are we bowing to this warfare talk as if it were bullying?

I don't understand why we would do that either. We could put up a damn good fight.

Oh #.... that equals lots of dead people. that's what some elites like... lot's of dead bodies that they will make others bury. Makes impressive cemeteries. The living stay busy with war and the dead stay dead and we look at them and feel proud. Or is it guilty that we are still alive if we are not serving. I get it mixed up sometimes.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 06:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by BlackSatinDancer
why would they want to do that. the US is such good buttkissers for china, why would china want to do that?

if we try to NOT do what they want, sure, maybe... but what part of their butt has the US not kissed?

How is there a problem between us and China? Everytime someone says that i think that is what someone wants people to think to confuse people.

Are we bowing to this warfare talk as if it were bullying?

I don't understand why we would do that either. We could put up a damn good fight.

Oh #.... that equals lots of dead people. that's what some elites like... lot's of dead bodies that they will make others bury. Makes impressive cemeteries. The living stay busy with war and the dead stay dead and we look at them and feel proud. Or is it guilty that we are still alive if we are not serving. I get it mixed up sometimes.


good questions - the only suggestion i have for you is to research - i've had many questions and received many answers from diverse peoples - i had to search for myself to first "trust" but then i felt compelled to verify - when i was first introduced to the internet way back younder - i had lots of questions - you would not believe the pros and the cons - by reading, i gained a little understanding......i do know that knowledge is the beginning of understanding and as a result......wisdom, which is the right application -

welcome - you can either take the blue pill or the red pill but i must tell you that rabbit hole goes waaaay deep -

EDITED: to add this: and at this stage of the game (and it is a game) i am totally dazed and confused - so i keep reading -
edit on 26-12-2011 by musselwhite because: referenced above



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 07:33 AM
link   
How ridiculas. This had nothing to do with china. Dont people get fed up with the mind games.

You want to know who did 9/11!

Look no further than:
Rothchilds, rockerfellers, banksters. Period.

It was done by the ruling criminal, they wanted to kill a few of what they believe are their subjects to further their agenda.

If anyone tells you any diffrent they are a damn liar and should be hung for treason.



posted on Dec, 26 2011 @ 08:33 AM
link   
reply to post by mad scientist
 


Well the Asians have a higher IQ than us Caucasians.. Its best to avoid playing chess with them...



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 07:17 PM
link   
How much American debt does china hold? Yeah I bet they cant wait till America falls.



posted on Dec, 29 2011 @ 07:33 PM
link   
How did this thread get lost for so long. I've never heard any of this before. Very interesting. I suppose I should look back through all the 9/11 threads. Another star and flag.



new topics
 
7

log in

join