It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Photo of Triangle UFO !! very interesting !!

page: 2
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 6 2007 @ 08:18 PM
link   
The boomerang shaped image looked kind of strange when I viewed it using the "negative" feature of my image program.
It gives the impression that the left side of the image is all shadow or reflection. Kind of hard to explain, just take a look.
Had to resize and re-upload lol, it was wayyyy to big
www.gameznetwork.com...

[edit on 6-4-2007 by Kr0n0s]


Mod Edit: Image Size – Please Review This Link.

Mod Edit: Image Hotlinking – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 8/4/2007 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Apr, 6 2007 @ 08:26 PM
link   
When i first viewed it, i thought the entire image was the object, meaning the lights were the "front" of the ufo and the shadowy part was the rear of the object but now it looks like the left side of the object looks more like a shadow or something.



posted on Apr, 6 2007 @ 08:58 PM
link   
Maybe it was moving to the right...
And have you seen how perfectly horizontal those squares in the spheres are?
They don`t like to tumble...


[edit on 6/4/2007 by Johhn]



posted on Apr, 6 2007 @ 11:15 PM
link   
From the blur coming off the house etc that glowing dot could just of been repeated due to a unsteady hand.

[edit on 22/08/06 by Canada_EH]



posted on Apr, 7 2007 @ 12:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Johhn
At first i thought it (Missouri boomerang UFO) was a fake,but after filtering...no more doubts in my mind...
It`s a real UFO...and quite a beauty too...
...
Look at the squares inside that ship...and that magnetic field...you can`t see THAT with the naked eye.

[edit on 6/4/2007 by Johhn]


Here John, look at my UFO. I bet you cant find the little alien in it...



img440.imageshack.us...

As far as Im concerned, it's a photoshop. The shadow/blur are part of the artists way of covering up any artifacts, and as you can see from the smaller image, it has not done a very good job of it. An obvious pixelatted square exists around the image.





edit - sorry about the size, not sure how to resize images... 8[



[edit on 7/4/2007 by badw0lf]


Mod Edit: Image Size – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 8/4/2007 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Apr, 7 2007 @ 05:02 AM
link   
I dont think its real. plus I've never seen a shadow like that on a cloud.



posted on Apr, 7 2007 @ 06:19 AM
link   
hey badwolf,i was talking about this picture...

i141.photobucket.com...

The camera moved a little...could explain that so called shadow...


Mod Edit: Image Size – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 8/4/2007 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Apr, 7 2007 @ 06:51 AM
link   
In the sphere (cube) on the rightside i found this...



And in the bottom sphere i found this...



So my conclusion would be...3 spheres that look like 1 UFO.



posted on Apr, 7 2007 @ 08:00 AM
link   
Geez. You can't just resize the image in your favourite photo editing software with a standard bilinear anti alias applied to it, it will generate fuzzy pixels all over the place and with a bit of imagination I bet you'll find alien faces, jesus grandma or your own sibling staring down at you.

Those images show squat I'm afraid and the one with the boomerang has a shadow on it when it seems to be zero clouds which means it could be a number of things but highly unlikely - an object in the sky. More likely explanations are (a) photo editing software or (b) something on the ccd or actual lens or maybe even (c) if it's a scan, crap in the scanner.



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 05:03 AM
link   
...i hope you change your mind some day...

Look at this.


I found him in a Mexican UFO a year ago.

[edit on 8/4/2007 by Johhn]



posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 05:16 AM
link   
The above cut came from this one...top left...



This is the UFO where the filtered cuts came from...




posted on Apr, 8 2007 @ 10:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by danx

Originally posted by roadgravel
Isn't the B2 base in Missouri?


Yes, at Whiteman Air Force Base.

The lights aren't consistent with the B2 light patterns though, but the photo looks fishy to me anyway.

I bet they were testing something, or had a little rendevous with the zetans.



posted on Apr, 9 2007 @ 01:17 PM
link   
So far the majority seems for favor "fake" as do I.......but I am not an image expert so what the hell do I know.......you would think after all this time someone would get a good triangle UFO pic.......



Time will tell though......



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1   >>

log in

join