14 5+ major earthquakes in 1 month!

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:18 PM
link   
I just went to www.usgs.gov to find the exact location of the earthquake in Iran and discovered something disturbing:



Magnitude 7.3 Southeast of the Loyalty Islands December 27, 2003
Magnitude 6.6 SOUTHEASTERN IRAN December 26, 2003
Magnitude 6.5 San Simeon, CA December 22, 2003
Magnitude 6.8 TAIWAN December 10, 2003
Magnitude 4.5 VIRGINIA December 09, 2003


The earth seems to be afraid of something and is shaking a bit...Any thoughts about why or what's happening/about to happen?

[Edited on 12-29-2003 by junglejake]

[Edited on 12-29-2003 by junglejake]




posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:22 PM
link   
There were over 500 aftershocks that happened after the recent california earthquake....these things happen everyday hundreds of times a day....Its just there have been a few larger ones closer together that make is seem unusual...

I dont think it hints at anything more unusual...its normal earth movement...



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:47 PM
link   
Just found another:

Magnitude 6.5 - PANAMA-COSTA RICA BORDER REGION
2003 December 25 07:11:11 UTC



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:48 PM
link   
Not surprised in the least and I expect this to increase. It seems the trend so far is clusters of earth quakes of increasing magnitude.

The dark star approaches and the gravitational effects will be great.



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:50 PM
link   
Dark Star neo? Like planet x?



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:53 PM
link   
Ok, gonna wait a little bit to post this one, but there are more:

Magnitude 6.1 - HOKKAIDO, JAPAN REGION
2003 December 29 01:30:54 UTC

Magnitude 5.8 - CENTRAL MID-ATLANTIC RIDGE
2003 December 23 05:58:37 UTC

Magnitude 5.2 - SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS REGION
2003 December 29 00:03:07 UTC

Magnitude 5.0 - OFF THE COAST OF OREGON
2003 December 27 15:23:15 UTC

Magnitude 6.0 - SOUTH OF THE KERMADEC ISLANDS
2003 December 25 14:21:11 UTC

Magnitude 5.5 - SOUTHERN SUMATRA, INDONESIA
2003 December 24 11:33:08 UTC

Magnitude 5.6 - NORTHEAST OF TAIWAN
2003 December 23 23:15:27 UTC

Magnitude 5.6 - AZORES ISLANDS REGION
2003 December 23 14:02:03 UTC

Wow...I didn't expect that many...This is just 5+ quakes, there's tons of little guys. And this also doesn't include aftershocks and preshocks, just the largest quake to hit that region in the past week...Dang...



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 04:54 PM
link   
What's this dark star you're talking about?



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:08 PM
link   
Planet X is actual planets outside the orbits of Pluto.

Seeming on extreme elliptical orbits according to those talking about them these days. I see no reason to believe that their orbits are so extremely elliptical unless this is used to explain orbital exceptions in the rest of the solar system which are better explained by the dark star. The outer Planet X's are in fact plural.

The dark star is the dead second star in our solar system that on elliptic orbit re-enters our solar system periodically.

Remember that most known solar system are in fact binary or higher degree.

Note that a dark star would not be observable until very close to a planetary body.



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by THENEO
Planet X is actual planets outside the orbits of Pluto.

Seeming on extreme elliptical orbits according to those talking about them these days. I see no reason to believe that their orbits are so extremely elliptical unless this is used to explain orbital exceptions in the rest of the solar system which are better explained by the dark star. The outer Planet X's are in fact plural.

The dark star is the dead second star in our solar system that on elliptic orbit re-enters our solar system periodically.

Remember that most known solar system are in fact binary or higher degree.

Note that a dark star would not be observable until very close to a planetary body.


Where did you come by this information? I've never heard about it and I follow astronomy constantly...



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:19 PM
link   
Astronomy is not a perfect science.

If you follow it then you will know about the analomies in pluto's orbit and current scientific conjecture regarding high probability of extra solar bodies past it.

If you are aware of astronomy then you know about binary stars and issues of star life spans. You will also beaware of varying solar intensity cycles too.

But you will not be aware of our dual sun because they do not want you to be.

If you are so knowledgeable about astronomy then why ask what are questions that an unknowledgeable person would ask?



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:25 PM
link   
At the time of Winter Solstice (once a year), the Sun is at the low point in the northern hemisphere, whereas the Moon is at its highest point in the sky. This generates higher than normal tides which result in lots of tectonic movement(earthquakes).



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by THENEO
But you will not be aware of our dual sun because they do not want you to be.


Ok, I can't let that one go.

First: Who is they that don't want you to know about the dark star?

Second: Why do they not want us to know about this dark star?

Third: How did you become privy to this information, if they don't want you to?

Fourth: How can we unknowlegable ignorant people become so wise?



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:37 PM
link   
For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.

Mat 24:8 All these [are] the beginning of sorrows


Im not religious but maybe I should be



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by xxKristinexx
Im not religious but maybe I should be


Yep.



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:41 PM
link   
i dont know if you have read it already, but i have a good link for that. there have been a LOT of earth quakes in the past several months or so.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by junglejake

Originally posted by THENEO
But you will not be aware of our dual sun because they do not want you to be.


Ok, I can't let that one go.

First: Who is they that don't want you to know about the dark star?

Second: Why do they not want us to know about this dark star?

Third: How did you become privy to this information, if they don't want you to?

Fourth: How can we unknowlegable ignorant people become so wise?


Your eagerness to prove people wrong indicates your own insecurity.

answer to question one, you are at a conspiracy website are you not?

answer to question two, you are at a conspiracy website are you not? Besides you know so much about astronomy so YOU tell us what the effects would be?

answer to question three, do a search on the web first. Then tell us what you find. I will tell you what is valid.

answer to question four, ignorance comes from a closed mind.



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:55 PM
link   
Neo do a thread with the info. It sounds like it would be a good one. I did a search on google didn't find crap except about the black hole in the center of the galaxy etc.





edited due to beer impairment.

[Edited on 29-12-2003 by DiRtYDeViL]



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 05:56 PM
link   
Just because I voice the arguements I have in my head against the information presented doesn't mean I'm trying to prove them wrong, I'm trying to give them the opportunity to show me where I'm erring.

As for the effects, it would depend on the distance it would be at from us. Generally, binary star systems first don't have eliptical orbits, and the minimum distance they are at is about 5 AUs. So there would be a large distance from us. If it's a dark star, it would probably be a brown dwarf, or else a black hole (no), which radiates very little heat, and is only about 40-60 times the size of Jupiter. It would have some orbital effects, but we would be well aware of the changing seasons becoming longer and more dramatic well after we could see it.

Yeah, I'm at a conspiracy website. And the largest problem I've found with it is that very few back up what they present as fact with any evidence. Example:



Then tell us what you find. I will tell you what is valid


How is it that you are the one who knows all on this, and knows it as fact? And how are you the truth who doesn't need to back up his statements with any evidence or facts, or links? I'm sorry, but you haven't convinced me yet, but I will look into these dark star websites, I'm curious how the theory could transpire...

On another note, you say most stars are binary, but what you left out is most stars containing planets we've found to date are single stars...Just like ours.



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 06:01 PM
link   
i think theneo means the rements of the blackhole that fourmed our solarsystem

it is almost died, but it is feeding a little and this is how they found it..




but THENEO all the time iv been here iv seen you post lots of BS plane BS retiale aliens, planet X, and SH*T

its just my opionen that at least 50% of the stuff you post has 0 proof.



posted on Dec, 29 2003 @ 06:07 PM
link   
I'll let you make a thread because it was your idea.

Do not avoid searching for the following:

binary star systems
brown and dwarf stars
life of stars
oort cloud
analomies in solar system orbits
dark matter
nexus seven
variably periodic orbits

I can provide more info later on.






top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join