This topic is in the Secret Societies discussion forum.  (rss)


Helen Mirren's Tattoo


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 5-5-2007 @ 07:15 PM by Delta Alter


Hit the nail on the head. I make no effort.

There's no point. As you *so rightly* pointed out by calling me ignorant and oh, a cactus -I'm not armed with the intellectual backing and reams upon reams of knowledge about masonry that you people always require in order for us to validate our argument.

I have no energy for it.

I posted this thread cause I thought some people might be interested in Helen Miren's tattoo -NOT to engage in an overly discussed topic that I have already made my mind up on.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-5-2007 @ 07:38 PM by Rockpuck




There's no point. As you *so rightly* pointed out by calling me ignorant and oh, a cactus -I'm not armed with the intellectual backing and reams upon reams of knowledge about masonry that you people always require in order for us to validate our argument.



Then I fail to see your point, entirely, with anything that involves this thread, and if this is your attitude, then no doubt any of your other threads.

On ATS you should be prepared to back what ever it is you claim with some form of evidence. A conspiracy site it may be, there is a certain standard.



I have no energy for it.



Right.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-5-2007 @ 07:38 PM by wu kung


Okay, I couldn't resist.

If you want sensationalism, go somewhere else.
That kind of behavior is not welcome here.

Go to the National Enquirer or, even better suited to your level, the Weekly World News.

Oh, and you say that you're a thirty year old woman?
Well, perhaps it's high time to start conducting yourself like a lady.

You have successfully proven how little you know of the world and I applaud you for it.
By the way, you did resort to childishness in your posts, and you continue to do so.
It's sad, but you are right about something.
This site is losing it's "edge", as you put it, but only because of people like you.
To claim that you are open minded is an insult to actual open minded people who prefer to learn about their world rather than to make egotistical assumptions about it.
You know what they say about people who assume?
They run the risk of jumping to the wrong conclusions.

Oh, and don't bother calling me "kid", I'm the same age as you, at least chronologically.

You want sensationalism?
Go watch Oprah.
You want knowledge?
Come and engage in civil debate here on ATS.

End Statement.




reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-5-2007 @ 08:10 PM by mojo4sale



Originally posted by Delta Alter
It may be a rune, it may be an Indian symbol - but it just as likely may be a symbol of Freemasonry.




So what if it is a masonic symbol, or a rune, or anyother damn thing for that matter.
Its a tattoo, its obviously fairly old judging by the fading and thickening of the lines, something she had done when in her own words "i was young and foolish".
Did you have a point in pointing out this tattoo. What if it is a masonic symbol, what would that mean, that Helen Mirren has cloven hooves and a pointy tail.
If its a nordic rune would that mean that she believes in Thor and Odin.
If its native american would that make her a shamen.
I dont get what your trying to infer.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 01:52 AM by mojo4sale


How bizarre is that, just been down to the pub to watch the De la Hoya vs Mayweather fight and who's got front row seats - Helen Mirren.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 06:59 AM by Delta Alter


OK, the battle for the last word ensues...............

I posted this thread because I am interested in people in positions of power and celebrity that have Masonic connections. So shoot me.

I am suspicious of ANY secret society that holds members in positions of power, for obvious reasons - and Freemasonry fits the bill there.

I am also suspicious of any group of WEALTHY businessmen that claims that they purely exist for philanthropy - again, for obvious reasons.

I am not an intellectual, but I have an opinion and I am certainly not ignorant or arrogant.

I posted this thread because the photograph interested me and I thought maybe it would interest other people - I did not say at any time that this was IRREFUTABLE PROOF that Helen Mirren is a Mason. I just thought it was a 'bit weird.'

And as you are Masons, and BOUND to defend your 'craft' I have no interest in debating with you on the topic because I am not interested in what you have to say. I was hoping to attract more 'like-minded' people to this thread. I am entitled to that as a member of this forum, despite what you say.

Oh, and by the way. Have you considered the fact that maybe you don't understand the full picture about your 'Brethren.'

You go to Masonic meetings as a way of getting away from 'er indoors?'



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 07:51 AM by Voyager1


It looks like to me its a flattened out elongated square and compass. Or, two x's side by side. Aren't X's a symbol of the Illuminati?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 07:57 AM by Delta Alter



Originally posted by Voyager1
It looks like to me its a flattened out elongated square and compass. Or, two x's side by side. Aren't X's a symbol of the Illuminati?


No idea, Voyager - but I would be very interested to hear more if you know anything about it



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 09:01 AM by Trinityman


Whether you like it or not, you are going to get my opinion of your opinion...


Originally posted by Delta Alter
I am suspicious of ANY secret society that holds members in positions of power, for obvious reasons - and Freemasonry fits the bill there.

Incorrect perception #1. There are very few members of freemasonry that hold 'positions of power'. There are far far more non-masons holding the reins and any potential influence freemasons would be swamped.

Freemasonry does NOT fit the bill.


I am also suspicious of any group of WEALTHY businessmen that claims that they purely exist for philanthropy - again, for obvious reasons.

Incorrect perception #2. Freemasony is not a club of wealthy businessmen. There is a mix of people in my lodge in England, from professional people right down to a retired dustman. In lodges I have visited in Alabama the profile is even more 'working class'. I have met thousands of freemasons in my 14 years of membership and only half a dozen or so could be described as 'independently wealthy', no more or less than I might expect to meet in the general population.

Incorrect perception #3. Freemasonry does not claim to be a philanthropic organization. Its primary purpose is to act as a personal development program, and it achieves this through three major tenets - brotherly love, relief and truth. The giving to charity is as often done in private as it is publicized; and it is more accurate to describe the philanthropy as a by-broduct of its aims rather than the aim itself.


I am not an intellectual, but I have an opinion and I am certainly not ignorant or arrogant.

That would depend how you define ignorant, as you have demonstrated a stellar lack of knowledge of the real function and purpose of freemasonry, as opposed to the popular perception of the organization.


I posted this thread because the photograph interested me and I thought maybe it would interest other people - I did not say at any time that this was IRREFUTABLE PROOF that Helen Mirren is a Mason. I just thought it was a 'bit weird.'

And if you reread the thread you will find my attempts to answer this question, and even assist you in keeping the thread on track.


And as you are Masons, and BOUND to defend your 'craft'

Incorrect perception #4. Freemasons make no obligation to defend the fraternity as a whole, and for the most part over the last 200 years or so have maintained a dignified silence when baseless accusations have been bandied around. But more and more freemasons are becoming sick and tired of the misinformation which is being perpetuated on the internet, promulgated for the most part by innocent pawns who regurgitate theory and allegation without any basis in fact, and believe what they are told without further investigation.


I have no interest in debating with you on the topic because I am not interested in what you have to say. I was hoping to attract more 'like-minded' people to this thread. I am entitled to that as a member of this forum, despite what you say.

If you want to discuss kooky masonic conspiracy theories with people who will only agree with you, then you are in the wrong place my friend. Here all kinds of veiwpoints and preconceived notions are challenged and discussed.


Oh, and by the way. Have you considered the fact that maybe you don't understand the full picture about your 'Brethren.'

Alternatively, have you considered the possibility that a freemason of 14 years standing who has been actively delving into masonic conspiracy theory for over 5 years might know more about these things than a non-mason? If you have some value to add then please add it. Tell me specifics. Or, quite frankly, get off the pot.


You go to Masonic meetings as a way of getting away from 'er indoors?'

Incorrect perception #5.Most freemasons I know my age work far too long and spend far too little time with the family. The have been many month when my single evening at lodge has been the only social activity I have undertaken all month. Your simplistic attempt to portray freemasons as part of a 'war of the sexes' doesn't begin to cover the reasons why more and more 21st century men are finding such pleasure in freemasonry, and why they are generally supported in this by their wives.

I urge you to do some serious research into what freemasonry is really all about, and don't just take for granted what sensationalists and agenda-driven individuals have to say on the matter.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 09:05 AM by Cynic


I don't care what the tattoo represents. She's still hot for an old lady.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 09:28 AM by mojo4sale



Originally posted by Delta Alter

And as you are Masons, and BOUND to defend your 'craft' I have no interest in debating with you on the topic because I am not interested in what you have to say. I was hoping to attract more 'like-minded' people to this thread. I am entitled to that as a member of this forum, despite what you say.




1st, i'm not a mason, never have been and probably never will and know very little about it. I responded because you seemed to be inferring that because Helen Mirren has a Tattoo that you think is a masonic symbol that there is something strange going on. I dont get that at all.
2nd, if you post something on this site then you better get ready to defend your view point, because other members of this forum that dont agree with your position are also entitled to reply to your thread. Believe me i learnt that early on.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-5-2007 @ 09:21 PM by Eyeofhorus


I haven't posted on these discusssion boards in quite a while. I laugh out loud; as it seems that nothing has changed in the year or two I have been idle. I remember the days of thinking that all masons were in cohorts against mankind, and that they secretly controlled the goings-on of many governments worldwide. I even decided to read morals and dogma, by Albert pike, looking for satanic references and whatnot. Then I pulled my head out of my stink-hole and realized that I was an idiot.

Masonry is a Way of life, to make one into a better person. To gain connections with lifelong friends. To attain knowledge of history, science, and divine alchemy. Not to spend hours stagnating on online discussion boards discussing some senior citizen's tattoo. The real conspiracy: I got a tattoo on my behind, a "B" on each cheek, now when I moon people they all yell "hi, BOB." haha.

But seriously folks. Why not research a real conspiracy against mankind, like the klan, or aryan nation, or anarchists. Something that actually conspires against mankind, not a society that tries to better people. I really think that all these mason bashers carry a serious personal resentment against masons, because you truly want what they have. But you are simply too lazy to seek it. Who are you going to rip on next? Alcoholics Anonomous? College fraternities? What a waste of time and effort to spend so much of your time resenting the other members on these boards. The internet is a powerful resource, it can give you the power to sound right, because Dr. Bob anonomous posted something about masonic conspiracy on his webpage. But where is his credability, or anyone's for that matter. If you want a real conspiracy against man, talk about the vast internet "scum pond" of "information."
Thank you for your time.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, , ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.179 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread